RESUMO
Background: The effectiveness of dietary therapy to induce remission of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been evaluated over the last decades and summarized in meta-analyses. Choosing the dietary modality, identifying the most suitable patients, and implementing specific prerequisites are essential to ensure long-term success. Summary: Impractical exclusive elemental diets provided the highest remission rates in EoE; however, they are not recommended due to their numerous disadvantages and detrimental effects on patient quality of life. Allergy testing-guided diets for EoE are limited; their insufficient effectiveness and low reproducibility are due to poor accuracy of skin or serum test results in identifying EoE food triggers. Initial experiences with a six-food elimination diet have provided evidence of high and predictive effectiveness rates and paved the way for less restrictive and more efficient step-up approaches, including four-food, two-food, and most recently, milk elimination diets. Dietary treatment for EoE is challenging for patients and families and requires certain skills to ensure success in the short and long term. Key Messages: The selection of appropriate patients is essential to ensure the success of and long-term adherence to dietary treatment of EoE. As normal triggers for EoE are commonly found in the staple diet, it is important to ensure adequate nutritional substitutes to avoid nutrient deficiency risks when long-lasting feeding difficulties or extensive restrictions are present. Specialized facilities in dietary therapy should adopt patient-centered and personalized approaches in order to provide timely monitoring and support for complex cases.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Rising trends in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have been repeatedly linked to declining Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, mostly in retrospective studies. We aimed to prospectively evaluate this inverse association. METHODS: Prospective case-control study conducted in 23 centers. Children and adults naïve to eradication therapy for H. pylori were included. Cases were EoE patients, whereas controls were defined by esophageal symptoms and <5 eos/HPF on esophageal biopsies. H. pylori status was diagnosed by non-invasive (excluding serology) or invasive testing off proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy for 2 weeks. Atopy was defined by the presence of IgE-mediated conditions diagnosed by an allergist. RESULTS: 808 individuals, including 404 cases and 404 controls (170 children) were enrolled. Overall H. pylori prevalence was 38% (45% children vs. 37% adults, p 0.009) and was not different between cases and controls (37% vs. 40%, p 0.3; odds ratio (OR) 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.30), neither in children (42% vs. 46%, p 0.1) nor in adults (36% vs. 38%, p 0.4). Atopy (OR 0.85; 95%CI 0.75-0.98) and allergic rhinitis (OR 0.81; 95%CI 0.68-0.98) showed a borderline inverse association with H. pylori infection in EoE patients. This trend was not confirmed for asthma or food allergy. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori infection was not inversely associated with EoE, neither in children nor in adults. A borderline inverse association was confirmed for atopy and allergic rhinitis, but not asthma of food allergy. Our findings question a true protective role of H. pylori infection against allergic disorders, including EoE.