Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Braz. dent. sci ; 27(2): 1-7, 2024. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: biblio-1570168

RESUMO

Objective: This study aimed to investigate of bioactive materials with specific properties, particularly highly plastic bioceramic cements. These materials are being studied extensively due to their potential to maintain pulp vitality and promote tissue regeneration. Material and Methods: Tooth discoloration induced by an experimental tricalcium silicate-based cement (EC) was evaluated and compared with that of Biodentine (BD) and white MTA-Angelus (MTA). Cavities were prepared on the lingual surfaces of thirty-two blocks of healthy bovine incisors. The blocks were chemically cleaned and then subjected to an initial color evaluation (CIELab values) using a spectrophotometer and randomly divided into three experimental groups (n=10); two additional blocks served as controls. After manipulation, the cements were placed in the cavities, which were subsequently restored with composite restorations. After another color measurement (baseline), they were immersed in bottles of distilled water; they were stored at 37 °C and 100% humidity for the entire test period. The color change (ΔE) was measured after 14, 30, 120 and 150 days. ANOVA and Tukey tests showed significant differences after 14 days (EC vs. MTA), 30 days (EC vs. BD) and 120/150 days (EC vs. BD/MTA) (p < 0.05). Results: All tested materials induced ΔE changes, with the EC group showing the least change at the end of the experiment (ΔE=4.08). Conclusion: EC induced less color change over a 5-month period and thus showed color stability over the entire period, whereas BD and MTA showed progressive discoloration. (AU)


Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar materiais bioativos com propriedades específicas, particularmente cimentos biocerâmicos altamente plásticos. Esses materiais estão sendo amplamente estudados devido ao seu potencial para manter a vitalidade da polpa e promover a regeneração dos tecidos. Material e Métodos: A descoloração dentária induzida por um cimento experimental à base de silicato tricálcico (CE) foi avaliada e comparada com a do Biodentine (BD) e do MTA-Angelus branco (MTA). Foram preparadas cavidades nas superfícies linguais de trinta e dois blocos de incisivos bovinos saudáveis. Os blocos foram quimicamente limpos e, em seguida, submetidos a uma avaliação inicial de cor (valores CIELab) usando um espectrofotômetro e divididos aleatoriamente em três grupos experimentais (n=10); dois blocos adicionais serviram como controles. Após a manipulação, os cimentos foram colocados nas cavidades, que foram posteriormente restauradas com compósito. Após outra medição de cor (valor de referência), eles foram imersos em frascos de água destilada; oram armazenados a 37 °C e 100% de umidade durante todo o período de teste. A alteração de cor (ΔE) foi medida após 14, 30, 120 e 150 dias. Os testes ANOVA e Tukey mostraram diferenças significativas após 14 dias (CE vs. MTA), 30 dias (CE vs. BD) e 120/150 dias (CE vs. BD/MTA) (p < 0,05). Resultados: Todos os materiais testados induziram alterações de ΔE, sendo que o grupo EC apresentou a menor alteração no final do experimento (ΔE=4,08). Conclusão: O EC induziu menos alterações de cor em um período de 5 meses e, portanto, apresentou estabilidade de cor durante todo o período, enquanto o BD e o MTA apresentaram descoloração progressiva.(AU)


Assuntos
Cimento de Silicato , Descoloração de Dente , Materiais Biomédicos e Odontológicos , Cimentos Dentários , Endodontia
2.
Dent. press endod ; 7(3): 22-26, set.-dec. 2017. ilus
Artigo em Português | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: biblio-877428

RESUMO

Introdução: o conhecimento das possíveis variações da cavidade pulpar torna-se necessário para aumentar o êxito nos tratamentos endodônticos, tornando relevante o reconhecimento do canal cavo inter-radicular (CCIR). Objetivo: relatar o caso de um primeiro molar inferior com ampla perda óssea na região de furca associada à presença de canal cavo inter-radicular. Relato de caso: paciente relatou o surgimento de "bolhas ao redor do dente". Ao exame clínico, constatou-se a presença de fístula associada à necrose pulpar do dente #36; não existiam sinais de doença periodontal. Radiograficamente, identificou- se extensa rarefação na região de furca e periapical. Após cuidadoso acesso, foi realizada radiografia na qual constatou-se a presença do FC comunicando a câmara pulpar à furca. Após a localização dos canais radiculares e seu preparo químico-mecânico, procederam-se trocas de hidróxido de cálcio após 240 dias, constatando-se franco reparo. Após 270 dias, obturaram-se os canais radiculares e procedeu-se ao selamento da embocadura desses e do CCIR com MTA. No controle de 360 dias, observou-se a ausência de sinais clínicos indesejáveis e neoformação óssea na região de furca. Conclusão: é de fundamental importância o conhecimento da existência do CCIR e sua relação com lesões de furca em dentes sem sinais clínicos de doença periodontal; nesses casos, a correta sanificação do sistema de canais é capaz de solucionar problemas endoperiodontais, mesmo de grandes proporções, restabelecendo a saúde do paciente e, assim, evitando tratamentos desnecessários.


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Cavidade Pulpar/anatomia & histologia , Endodontia , Defeitos da Furca/terapia , Preparo de Canal Radicular
3.
Braz Dent J ; 25(1): 12-6, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24789285

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to compare in vivo the accuracy of two electronic foramen locators (EFLs) based on different operation systems - Root ZX and Propex II. Ten healthy adult patients needing premolar extractions due to orthodontic reasons participated in the study, providing a sample of 17 noncarious, non-restored, vital teeth (n= 24 canals). After coronal access preparation and cervical preflaring and prior to tooth extraction, the root canal length was measured alternating the two EFLs. All measurements were performed with K-files well fitted to the canal diameter at the level that each EFL indicated the apical foramen in their display (APEX or 0.0). The last K-file were fixed in place with cyanoacrylate, the tooth was extracted, and the apical 4 mm of each root were resected to measure the distance between the file tip and the apical foramen. The mean errors based on the absolute values of discrepancies were 0.30 ± 0.29 mm (Root ZX) and 0.32 ± 0.27 mm (Propex II). Analysis by the Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed no statistically significant differences between the electronic canal measurements performed with the EFLs (p=0.587). The apical foramen was accurately located in 75% (Root ZX) and 66.7% (Propex II) of the cases, considering a ±0.5 mm error margin, with no statistically significant difference by the chi-square test. Despite having different measurement mechanisms, both EFLs were capable of locating the apical foramen with high accuracy in vivo. Under the tested clinical conditions, Root ZX and Propex II displayed similar results.


Assuntos
Eletrônica , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Tratamento do Canal Radicular , Extração Dentária , Adulto Jovem
4.
Braz. dent. j ; 25(1): 12-16, Jan-Feb/2014. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-709394

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to compare in vivo the accuracy of two electronic foramen locators (EFLs) based on different operation systems - Root ZX and Propex II. Ten healthy adult patients needing premolar extractions due to orthodontic reasons participated in the study, providing a sample of 17 noncarious, non-restored, vital teeth (n= 24 canals). After coronal access preparation and cervical preflaring and prior to tooth extraction, the root canal length was measured alternating the two EFLs. All measurements were performed with K-files well fitted to the canal diameter at the level that each EFL indicated the apical foramen in their display (APEX or 0.0). The last K-file were fixed in place with cyanoacrylate, the tooth was extracted, and the apical 4 mm of each root were resected to measure the distance between the file tip and the apical foramen. The mean errors based on the absolute values of discrepancies were 0.30 ± 0.29 mm (Root ZX) and 0.32 ± 0.27 mm (Propex II). Analysis by the Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed no statistically significant differences between the electronic canal measurements performed with the EFLs (p=0.587). The apical foramen was accurately located in 75% (Root ZX) and 66.7% (Propex II) of the cases, considering a ±0.5 mm error margin, with no statistically significant difference by the chi-square test. Despite having different measurement mechanisms, both EFLs were capable of locating the apical foramen with high accuracy in vivo. Under the tested clinical conditions, Root ZX and Propex II displayed similar results.


O presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar, in vivo, a precisão de dois localizadores eletrônicos foraminais (LEFs) baseados em diferentes mecanismos de funcionamento, Root ZX e Propex II, na determinação do forame apical, sendo utilizados nos mesmos dentes. Após o acesso coronário e o pré-alargamento, e anteriormente à exodontia, os comprimentos de 24 canais radiculares foram determinados eletronicamente alternando-se os dois LEFs. As odontometrias foram realizadas até que os dispositivos apontassem o FA (APEX), utilizando-se limas tipo-K ajustadas. O último instrumento utilizado foi fixado em posição, o dente extraído e os 4,0 mm apicais de cada canal desgastados de forma a possibilitar a determinação da distância entre a ponta dos instrumentos e o forame apical. Os erros médios em função dos valores absolutos das discrepâncias foram, respectivamente, 0,30 ± 0,29 mm (Root ZX) e 0,32 ± 0,27 mm (Propex II). A análise estatística realizada por meio do teste de Wilcoxon para amostras pareadas demonstrou a semelhança entre as determinações do forame apical realizadas pelos dois LEFs (p=0,587). O comprimento radicular até o forame apical foi corretamente determinado em 75% (Root ZX) e 66,7% (Propex II) dos casos, considerando margem de ± 0,5 mm, sem diferenças estatísticas quando analisados pelo teste qui-quadrado. Os LEFs avaliados e consequentemente seus mecanismos de funcionamento, foram capazes de determinar o comprimento dos canais radiculares com precisão em condições in vivo. Nas condições do presente estudo, Root ZX e Propex II apresentaram resultados semelhantes.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Eletrônica , Tratamento do Canal Radicular , Extração Dentária
5.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 21(2): 132-7, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23739852

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate, ex vivo, the precision of five electronic root canal length measurement devices (ERCLMDs) with different operating systems: the Root ZX, Mini Apex Locator, Propex II, iPex, and RomiApex A-15, and the possible influence of the positioning of the instrument tips short of the apical foramen. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-two mandibular bicuspids had their real canal lengths (RL) previously determined. Electronic measurements were performed 1.0 mm short of the apical foramen (-1.0), followed by measurements at the apical foramen (0.0). The data resulting from the comparison of the ERCLMD measurements and the RL were evaluated by the Wilcoxon and Friedman tests at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Considering the measurements performed at 0.0 and -1.0, the precision rates for the ERCLMDs were: 73.5% and 47.1% (Root ZX), 73.5% and 55.9% (Mini Apex Locator), 67.6% and 41.1% (Propex II), 61.7% and 44.1% (iPex), and 79.4% and 44.1% (RomiApex A-15), respectively, considering ±0.5 mm of tolerance. Regarding the mean discrepancies, no differences were observed at 0.0; however, in the measurements at -1.0, the iPex, a multi-frequency ERCLMD, had significantly more discrepant readings short of the apical foramen than the other devices, except for the Propex II, which had intermediate results. When the ERCLMDs measurements at -1.0 were compared with those at 0.0, the Propex II, iPex and RomiApex A-15 presented significantly higher discrepancies in their readings. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of the present study, all the ERCLMDs provided acceptable measurements at the 0.0 position. However, at the -1.0 position, the ERCLMDs had a lower precision, with statistically significant differences for the Propex II, iPex, and RomiApex A-15.


Assuntos
Instrumentos Odontológicos , Cavidade Pulpar/anatomia & histologia , Odontometria/instrumentação , Preparo de Canal Radicular/instrumentação , Ápice Dentário/anatomia & histologia , Eletrônica Médica/instrumentação , Humanos , Tamanho do Órgão , Valores de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas
6.
J. appl. oral sci ; 21(2): 132-137, Mar-Apr/2013. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-674356

RESUMO

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate, ex vivo, the precision of five electronic root canal length measurement devices (ERCLMDs) with different operating systems: the Root ZX, Mini Apex Locator, Propex II, iPex, and RomiApex A-15, and the possible influence of the positioning of the instrument tips short of the apical foramen. Material and Methods: Forty-two mandibular bicuspids had their real canal lengths (RL) previously determined. Electronic measurements were performed 1.0 mm short of the apical foramen (-1.0), followed by measurements at the apical foramen (0.0). The data resulting from the comparison of the ERCLMD measurements and the RL were evaluated by the Wilcoxon and Friedman tests at a significance level of 5%. Results: Considering the measurements performed at 0.0 and -1.0, the precision rates for the ERCLMDs were: 73.5% and 47.1% (Root ZX), 73.5% and 55.9% (Mini Apex Locator), 67.6% and 41.1% (Propex II), 61.7% and 44.1% (iPex), and 79.4% and 44.1% (RomiApex A-15), respectively, considering ±0.5 mm of tolerance. Regarding the mean discrepancies, no differences were observed at 0.0; however, in the measurements at -1.0, the iPex, a multi-frequency ERCLMD, had significantly more discrepant readings short of the apical foramen than the other devices, except for the Propex II, which had intermediate results. When the ERCLMDs measurements at -1.0 were compared with those at 0.0, the Propex II, iPex and RomiApex A-15 presented significantly higher discrepancies in their readings. Conclusions: Under the conditions of the present study, all the ERCLMDs provided acceptable measurements at the 0.0 position. However, at the -1.0 position, the ERCLMDs had a lower precision, with statistically significant differences for the Propex II, iPex, and RomiApex A-15.


Assuntos
Humanos , Instrumentos Odontológicos , Cavidade Pulpar/anatomia & histologia , Odontometria/instrumentação , Preparo de Canal Radicular/instrumentação , Ápice Dentário/anatomia & histologia , Eletrônica Médica/instrumentação , Tamanho do Órgão , Valores de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas
7.
Int Dent J ; 58(2): 81-5, 2008 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18478888

RESUMO

This case demonstrates the ability of calcium hydroxide to cause connective tissue necrosis. A patient with a history of trauma exhibited a large area of external inflammatory root resorption affecting the cervical and middle thirds of tooth 12. After root canal cleaning, a calcium hydroxide root canal dressing was applied to control the resorption process. After three days when the patient attended for replacement of the dressing an irregular zone of necrosis was observed on the buccal aspect of the alveolar mucosa. Careful curettage and irrigation was then performed to remove the extruded calcium hydroxide and necrotic tissue. After curettage, the root canal was accessed and irrigated with saline solution for removal of remnants of the dressing. The dressing was than replaced taking care to avoid contact with soft tissue, which might induce further damage, minimising the overflow of material. Improvement in healing was observed at 15-day follow-up, with complete closure of the lesion by soft tissue. At the 120-day follow-up, no scar was detected. At 180-day follow-up, the root canal was filled only with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) with aid of K files #20 and #50. At two-year follow-up, there were no symptoms and the resorption process seemed to have ceased. It is important to emphasise the damage that may occur when calcium hydroxide is in close and extended contact with the soft tissues, which could happen when dressing material is extruded through a root resorption.


Assuntos
Hidróxido de Cálcio/efeitos adversos , Extravasamento de Materiais Terapêuticos e Diagnósticos/complicações , Mucosa Bucal/efeitos dos fármacos , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/efeitos adversos , Reabsorção da Raiz/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Necrose/induzido quimicamente
8.
J. appl. oral sci ; 15(5): 387-391, Sept.-Oct. 2007. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-465918

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cleaning efficacy of 2 percent chlorhexidine gluconate gel (CHX) compared to 2.5 percent sodium hypochlorite solution (NaOCl) associated or not with 17 percent EDTA used as irrigants during the biomechanical preparation. Fifty freshly extracted single-rooted human teeth with complete apex formation were randomly divided into five groups: G1 - sterile saline, G2 - 2.5 percent NaOCl, G3 - 2 percent CHX, G4 - 2.5 percent NaOCl + EDTA and G5 - 2 percent CHX + EDTA. The specimens of G1 were subdivided into two control groups. The teeth were decoronated and the coronal and middle root thirds were prepared with Gates-Glidden burs, and the apical third was reserved to manual instrumentation. All procedures were performed by a single operator. In all groups, 2 mL of irrigant was delivered between each file change. The teeth were sectioned and prepared for analyses under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). SEM micrographs were graded according to a score scale by two examiners. Data were analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests at 1 percent significance level. The best results were obtained in the groups in which the irrigant was used followed by the chelating agent. No statistically significant difference was observed among G4, G5 and the positive control group (p<0.01). The groups G2 and G3 were significantly different from the others, presenting the worst cleaning capacity. In conclusion, the use of the chelating agent is necessary to obtain clean canal walls, with open tubules and no heavy debris. The use of 2 percent chlorhexidine gluconate gel alone is not able to remove the smear layer.

9.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 15(5): 387-91, 2007 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19089166

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cleaning efficacy of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate gel (CHX) compared to 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution (NaOCl) associated or not with 17% EDTA used as irrigants during the biomechanical preparation. Fifty freshly extracted single-rooted human teeth with complete apex formation were randomly divided into five groups: G1 - sterile saline, G2 - 2.5% NaOCl, G3 - 2% CHX, G4 - 2.5% NaOCl + EDTA and G5 - 2% CHX + EDTA. The specimens of G1 were subdivided into two control groups. The teeth were decoronated and the coronal and middle root thirds were prepared with Gates-Glidden burs, and the apical third was reserved to manual instrumentation. All procedures were performed by a single operator. In all groups, 2 mL of irrigant was delivered between each file change. The teeth were sectioned and prepared for analyses under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). SEM micrographs were graded according to a score scale by two examiners. Data were analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests at 1% significance level. The best results were obtained in the groups in which the irrigant was used followed by the chelating agent. No statistically significant difference was observed among G4, G5 and the positive control group (p<0.01). The groups G2 and G3 were significantly different from the others, presenting the worst cleaning capacity. In conclusion, the use of the chelating agent is necessary to obtain clean canal walls, with open tubules and no heavy debris. The use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate gel alone is not able to remove the smear layer.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA