RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes of combined pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and secondary scleral fixation of an intraocular lens (IOL) using Gore-Tex suture versus flanged intrascleral haptic fixation (FIHF) using double needles. DESIGN: Single-centre retrospective cohort series. PARTICIPANTS: Eyes undergoing PPV with simultaneous scleral fixation of an IOL. METHOD: Eyes that underwent fixation of a Bausch & Lomb Akreos AO60 or enVista MX60E IOL using Gore-Tex suture or a Tecnis ZA9003 or Zeiss CT LUCIA 602 IOL using FIHF were included. The primary outcome was change from baseline visual acuity to postoperative month 3. Secondary outcomes included deviation from refractive target aim and rates of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Seventy-nine eyes of 72 patients were included. Mean (±SD) follow-up was 16 ± 10.5 months (range, 4.5-45.2 months). Fifty-three eyes (67.1%) underwent Gore-Tex suture fixation, and 26 eyes (32.9%) underwent FIHF. Across all eyes, mean visual acuity improved from 1.30 ± 0.74 logMAR (20/399 Snellen equivalent) preoperatively to 0.36 ± 0.36 logMAR (20/45 Snellen equivalent) at 3 months (p < 0.001). No difference in visual acuity at month 3 was noted between the 2 techniques (p = 0.34). Mean deviation from refractive target aim was not significantly different between the Gore-Tex and FIHF groups (+0.14 ± 1.33 D vs -0.16 ± 0.88 D; p = 0.45). Reoperation rates were similar between groups (2 of 53 eyes in the Gore-Tex group vs 3 of 26 eyes in the FIHF group; p = 0.32). CONCLUSION: Combined PPV and scleral fixation of IOLs with Gore-Tex suture and FIHF resulted in similar improvements in visual acuity. No significant differences in refractive outcome and postoperative complication profiles were noted.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for surgical failure after scleral buckling (SB) for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. DESIGN: Single-centre retrospective consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who underwent SB for repair of primary RRD at Wills Eye Hospital between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, were included. METHODS: Single-surgery anatomic success (SSAS) rate and risk factors associated with surgical failure were evaluated. A multivariable logistic regression model was completed to assess the effect of demographic, clinical, and operative variables on SSAS rate. RESULTS: A total of 499 eyes of 499 patients were included. Overall SSAS rate was 86% (n = 430 of 499). Using multivariate analysis, surgical failure was more likely in males (adjusted odds ratio [adjusted OR] = 2.98; 95% CI, 1.58-5.62; p = 0.0007) with a macula-off status on preoperative examination (adjusted OR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.10-4.20; p = 0.03) and preoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy (adjusted OR = 4.26; 95% CI, 1.10-16.5; p = 0.04). Time interval between initial examination and surgery (p = 0.26), distribution of buckle or band material used (p = 0.88), and distribution of tamponade used (p = 0.74) were not significantly different between eyes with and without surgical failure. CONCLUSION: Male sex, macula-off status, and preoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy were factors with increased odds of surgical failure after SB for primary RRD repair. Operative characteristics, such as type of band or use of tamponade, were not associated with surgical failure.

Assuntos

Descolamento Retiniano , Vitreorretinopatia Proliferativa , Humanos , Masculino , Recurvamento da Esclera/efeitos adversos , Descolamento Retiniano/diagnóstico , Descolamento Retiniano/etiologia , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vitreorretinopatia Proliferativa/complicações , Vitreorretinopatia Proliferativa/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vitrectomia/efeitos adversos , Acuidade Visual , Fatores de Risco

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess head position following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using a novel low-energy, non-intrusive 3-D position sensor platform. METHODS: In this prospective non-randomized interventional case series, a low-energy Bluetooth smart sensor housed within a novel eye shield recorded 3-D positional data every five minutes. The device was placed on the patient immediately after PPV and data was retrieved at the postoperative day 1 visit. Readings were processed by vector analysis into 4 groups, stratified by the angle of deviation away from a completely prone head position. The primary outcome was the angle between vectors. RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled in this pilot study. The mean (SD) age was 57.5 (17.4). A total of 2318 readings with a mean (SD) of 231.8 (26.8) readings per patient were obtained. The mean (SD) number of readings were 132.9 (34.7) while awake and 98.9 (27.9) during sleep. Of total readings, only 11.7% fell into group 1 while a majority of readings fell in group 2 (52.4%), and group 3 (32.4%), and only 3.5% fell into group 4. Positional deviation increased during sleep hours, with about 46.8% of readings at a reclined angle (group 3) and 4.9% supine, which was 21.6% and 2.5% respectively during the wake time (p<0.001, p=0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, a non-intrusive wireless 3-D position sensor-shield platform was tolerated well and capable of capturing positional data. Adherence to face-down positioning was low and positional deviation increased significantly while sleeping.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the agreement and correlation of manual central foveal thickness (CFT) measurements using the Heidelberg Eye Explorer and ImageJ software. METHODS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were identified. CFT was measured using the Heidelberg Eye Explorer caliper tool. Two independent graders measured the CFT of the same images using ImageJ software. A Pearson correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman plots, and coefficient of repeatability were used to assess the agreement and correlation between the Heidelberg Eye Explorer and ImageJ measurements. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-two OCT images from 91 patients were analyzed. Mean CFT as measured using the Heidelberg caliper tool was 264.8 ± 113 µm. Using ImageJ software, graders 1 and 2 obtained mean CFT values of 267 ± 114.3 µm and 270 ± 114.8 µm, respectively. Pearson correlation revealed a strong correlation between the Heidelberg and Image J measurements (r = 0.999, p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman plots noted a less than 4 µm mean difference between Heidelberg and ImageJ CFT values (2.67 ± 3.46 and 3.72 ± 2.78 µm for graders 1 and 2, respectively). CONCLUSION: There was strong agreement between the Heidelberg Eye Explorer and ImageJ software for manual CFT measurements. ImageJ may be a reliable tool for thickness measurements when proprietary OCT software is unavailable.

Assuntos

Software , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodos