RESUMO

Objective The approachability of the cervicothoracic region anteriorly based on age and gender, and the possibility of anatomic variances in different geographic populations have not been previously investigated. The aim of the present work was to perform a radiographic analysis of Brazilian patients to assess anterior approachability of the cervicothoracic junction based on age and gender. Methods Retrospective radiographic analysis of 300 computed tomography scans. Patients were separated based on age and gender. The radiographic parameters studied were: horizontal level above the sternum (HLS), vertebral body angle (VBA), intervertebral disc line (IDL), and intervertebral disc line angulation (IDLA). Results The most frequent HLS and IDL were T2 (34.3%) and C7-T1 (46%) respectively. Vertebral body angleand IDLA had average values of 18 ± 8.94 and 19 ± 7.9 degrees, respectively. Males had higher values in both IDLA ( p = 0.003) and VBA ( p = 0.02). Older groups had higher values in both IDLA ( p = 0.01) and VBA ( p = 0.001). No differences were observed in HLS between gender ( p = 0.3) or age groups ( p = 0.79). No differences were seen in IDL between gender groups ( p = 0.3); however, the older group had a more caudal level than the younger groups ( p = 0.12). Conclusions Compared to other populations, our sample had a more cephalad IDL and HLS. Vertebral body angle and IDLA were higher in males and higher angles for VBA and IDLA were shown for older groups. Intervertebral disc line was more caudal with aging.

RESUMO

Abstract Objective The approachability of the cervicothoracic region anteriorly based on age and gender, and the possibility of anatomic variances in different geographic populations have not been previously investigated. The aim of the present work was to perform a radiographic analysis of Brazilian patients to assess anterior approachability of the cervicothoracic junction based on age and gender. Methods Retrospective radiographic analysis of 300 computed tomography scans. Patients were separated based on age and gender. The radiographic parameters studied were: horizontal level above the sternum (HLS), vertebral body angle (VBA), intervertebral disc line (IDL), and intervertebral disc line angulation (IDLA). Results The most frequent HLS and IDL were T2 (34.3%) and C7-T1 (46%) respectively. Vertebral body angleand IDLA had average values of 18 ± 8.94 and 19 ± 7.9 degrees, respectively. Males had higher values in both IDLA (p= 0.003) and VBA (p= 0.02). Older groups had higher values in both IDLA (p= 0.01) and VBA (p= 0.001). No differences were observed in HLS between gender (p= 0.3) or age groups (p= 0.79). No differences were seen in IDL between gender groups (p= 0.3); however, the older group had a more caudal level than the younger groups (p= 0.12). ConclusionsCompared to other populations, our sample had a more cephalad IDL and HLS. Vertebral body angle and IDLA were higher in males and higher angles for VBA and IDLA were shown for older groups. Intervertebral disc line was more caudal with aging.

Resumo Objetivo A capacidade de acesso anterior à região cervicotorácica com base na idade e gênero do paciente e a possibilidade de variações anatômicas em diferentes populações geográficas ainda não foram investigadas. O objetivo deste trabalho foi realizar uma análise radiográfica de pacientes brasileiros para avaliar a acessibilidade anterior da junção cervicotorácica conforme idade e gênero. Métodos Análise radiográfica retrospectiva de 300 tomografias computadorizadas. Os pacientes foram separados por idade e gênero. Os parâmetros radiográficos estudados foram: nível horizontal acima do esterno (HLS, na sigla em inglês), angulação do corpo vertebral (VBA, na sigla em inglês), linha do disco intervertebral (IDL, na sigla em inglês) e angulação da linha do disco intervertebral (IDLA, na sigla em inglês). Resultados Os HLS e IDL mais frequentes foram T2 (34,3%) e C7-T1 (46%), respectivamente. Os valores médios de VBA e IDLA foram de 18 ± 8,94 e 19 ± 7,9 graus, respectivamente. Os homens apresentaram valores maiores de IDLA (p= 0,003) e VBA (p= 0,02). Os grupos de maior idade apresentaram valores maiores de IDLA (p= 0,01) e VBA (p= 0,001). Não houve diferenças de HLS entre os gêneros masculino e feminino (p= 0,3) ou faixas etárias (p= 0,79). Não foram observadas diferenças na IDL entre os gêneros masculino e feminino (p= 0,3); entretanto, o grupo mais velho apresentou nível mais caudal do que os grupos mais jovens (p= 0,12). ConclusõesEm comparação a outras populações, nossa amostra apresentou IDL e HLS mais cefálicos. AVBA e a IDLA foram maiores no gênero masculino, enquanto VBA e IDLA foram maiores em grupos mais velhos. A IDL era mais caudal em pacientes idosos.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective To compare the sagittal alignment (SA) parameters in individuals with LCS and surgical indication with a control group and to study the correlations between SA parameters and ODI, VAS and EQ-5D in individuals with LCS and surgical indication. Methods In this multicenter cross-sectional case-control study, the individuals were allocated as follows. A stenosis group (SG) composed by patients with LCS confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging with surgical indication, treated between July 2010 and August 2016 and a control group (CG), without LCS. All subjects underwent anamnesis, completed the Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and total spine radiographs were taken. Clinical data, HRQoL and radiographic parameters were correlated. Results Sixty-four individuals formed the SG and 14 the CG. The SG had higher values of mean age, coronal imbalance, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), sacrofemoral distance (SFD), overhang (OH), PI-LL mismatch, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and smaller thoracic kyphosis (TK), total (TLPL) and regional lumbopelvic lordosis (RLPL) in all vertebrae, sagittal offset (SO) in all evaluated vertebrae and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) with p <0.05. In the SG, the only significant correlations (p <0.05) were between TK and ODI and EQ-5D; all the other sagittal parameters did not correlated with VAS, ODI or EQ-5D. Conclusion SG had SA parameters altered in relation to CG. There was a direct correlation between decrease in TK and worsening of ODI and EQ-5D in SG. Level of evidence: III; Case Control Study.

RESUMO Objetivo Comparar parâmetros do AS em indivíduos portadores de EDL com indicação cirúrgica aos de uma população controle; estudar a correlação entre os questionários ODI, VAS e EQ-5D a parâmetros do AS nos portadores de EDL com indicação cirúrgica. Métodos Estudo transversal multicêntrico tipo caso-controle. Grupo estenose (GE) composto por portadores de EDL, confirmada por Ressonância Nuclear Magnética, com indicação cirúrgica, atendidos entre Julho de 2010 a agosto de 2016. Grupo controle (GC) sem EDL. Todos os indivíduos realizaram anamnese, responderam questionários de qualidade de vida e realizaram radiografias de coluna total. Dados clínicos, questionários e parâmetros radiográficos foram correlacionados. Resultados 64 indivíduos formaram o GE e 14 o GC. GE apresentou valores maiores de idade média, desequilíbrio coronal, sagital vertical index (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), sacrofemoral distance (SFD), overhang (OH), missmatch PI - LL, Owestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) e valores menores de cifose torácica, lordose lombopélvica total e regional em todas as vértebras, offset sagital em todas as vértebras avaliadas e EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), com p < 0,05. No GE, houve correlações significativas (p < 0,05) apenas entre TK e ODI e EQ-5D, sendo que todos os outros parâmetros sagitais não apresentaram correlação significativa com os questionários de qualidade de vida. Conclusão GE apresentou perda dos parâmetros de AS em relação ao GC. Houve correlação direta entre diminuição da TK e piora do ODI e EQ-5D no GE. Nível de Evidência III; Estudo de Caso Controle.

RESUMEN Objetivo Comparar los parámetros del alineamiento sagital (AS) en individuos con ECL e indicación quirúrgica con un grupo control y estudiar las correlaciones entre los parámetros de SA y ODI, EVA y EQ-5D en pacientes con ECL e indicación quirúrgica. Métodos En este estudio multicéntrico de casos y controles, los individuos fueron asignados como sigue. Un grupo estenosis (GE) compuesto por pacientes con ECL confirmada por imágenes de resonancia magnética con indicación quirúrgica, tratados entre julio de 2010 y agosto de 2016 y un grupo control (GC) sin ECL. Todos los individuos se sometieron a una anamnesis, respondieron el cuestionario de Calidad de Vida Relacionada con la Salud (HRQoL) y se tomaran radiografías totales de la columna. Se relacionaron datos clínicos, HRQoL y parámetros radiográficos. Resultados Sesenta y cuatro individuos formaron el GE y 14 el GC. El GE tenía valores más altos de edad promedio, desequilibrio coronal, eje sagital vertical (ESV), inclinación pélvica (IP), distancia sacrofemoral (DSF), protuberancia (P), falta de emparejamiento IP -LL, Índice de Discapacidad de Oswestry (ODI), Escala Visual Analógica (VAS) para el dolor y menos cifosis torácica (CT), lordosis lumbopélvica total (LLPT) y regional (LLPR) en todas las vértebras, offset sagital (OS) en todas las vértebras evaluadas y EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), con p < 0,05. En el GE, las únicas correlaciones significativas (p < 0,05) fueron entre TC y ODI y EQ-5D; todos los demás parámetros sagitales no se correlacionaron con EVA, ODI o EQ-5D. Conclusión El GE tuvo parámetros de AS alterados en relación con el GC. Hubo correlación directa entre la disminución de TC y el agravamiento del ODI y EQ-5D en el GE. Nivel de evidencia III; Estudio de Caso Controle.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objective The present work evaluated the motor deficit resulting from the psoas muscle access through the extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) approach. Methods This was a prospective, non-randomized, controlled, single-center study with 60 patients, with a mean age of 61.8 years old. All of the subjects underwent a lateral transpsoas retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion with electroneuromyographic guidance and accessing 1 to 3 lumbar levels (mean level, 1.4; 63% cases in only 1 level; 68% cases included L4-L5). The isometric hip flexion strength in the sitting position was determined bilaterally with a handheld dynamometer (Lafayette Instrument, Lafayette, IN, USA). Themean value of three peak forcemeasurements (N) was calculated. Standardized isometric strength tests were performed before the procedure and at 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postsurgery. Results Ipsilateral hip flexion was diminished (p < 0.001) at the early postoperative period, but reached preoperative values at 6 weeks (p > 0.12). The mean hip flexion measures before the procedure and at 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery were the following, respectively: 13 N; 9.7 N; 13.7 N; 14.4 N; and 16 N (ipsilateral); 13.3 N; 13.4 N; 15.3 N; 15.9 N; and 16.1 N (contralateral). Neither the level nor the number of treated levels had a clear association with thigh symptoms, but hip flexion weakness was the most common symptom. Conclusions Patients in the early postoperative period of transpsoas access presented hip flexion weakness. However, this weakness was transient, and electroneuromyography use is still imperative in transpsoas access. In addition, patients must be thoroughly educated about hip flexion weakness to prevent falls in the immediate postoperative period.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objectives: Whether or not to include L5-S1 in multiple level lumbar fusions is not yet a consensus in the literature. The option to preserve L5-S1 maintains the mobile segment and the possibility of a natural fit to the sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine. However, a long fusion above L5-S1 may accelerate the degenerative process and an extension to the sacrum may be necessary in the future. In this study, we evaluated the survival of the L5-S1 level after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) of 3-4 levels up to L5 and attempted to identify risk factors that could guide the selection of cases. Methods: Retrospective study in a single center. Inclusion: Patients that submitted to interbody fusion (LLIF) from 3-4 levels to L5 due to degenerative spine disease with at least 5 years of follow-up. Exclusion: L5 sacralization or L5-S1 disc ankylosis. We evaluated the reoperation rate including L5-S1 disc. We reviewed the preoperative images regarding coronal Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence; distal fractional curve; radiographic classification of DDD (modified by Weiner and Pfirrmann), as well as demographics parameters. These parameters were compared between the case group (reoperated) and the control group. Results: Forty-seven patients were included achieving a success rate of inclusion of 81%; the mean age was 69.1 years, 83% were women, and the mean of operated levels was 3.2. The survival rate of L5-S1 level was 89.6% at 5-year follow-up. No differences were found between the groups regarding the parameter evaluated. Conclusions: The L5-S1 survival rate was 896% after LLIF of 3-4 levels up to L5 at 5-year follow-up. Statistically no risk factors were found to warrant preoperative inclusion of L5-S1. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective Study.

RESUMO Objetivos: Incluir ou não o nível L5-S1 nas artrodeses lombares de múltiplos níveis ainda não é consenso na literatura. A opção de preservar L5S1 mantem o segmento móvel e a possibilidade de um ajuste natural ao alinhamento sagital da coluna lombar artrodesada. Porém, uma fusão longa acima de L5S1 pode acelerar seu processo degerativo e uma extensão ao sacro pode ser necessária futuramente. Neste estudo avaliamos a sobrevida do nível L5S1 após fusão intersomática por via lateral (LLIF) de 3-4 níveis até L5 e tentamos identificar fatores de risco que possam guiar a seleção dos casos. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo, em um único centro. Inclusão: pacientes submetidos a artrodese intersomática por LLIF de 3-4 níveis até L5 por doença degenerativa da coluna com ao menos cinco anos de seguimento. Exclusão: L5 sacralizada ou disco L5S1 anquilosado. Avaliamos a taxa de reoperação incluindo o disco L5S1. Revisamos as imagens pré-operatórias quanto: ângulo de Cobb coronal; lordose lombar; incidência pélvica; curva fracionada; classificações radiográficas de DDD (Weiner modificada e Pfirrman), além dos parâmetros demográficos. Tais parâmetros foram comparados entre o grupo caso (reoperados) e grupo controle. Resultados: 47 pacientes incluídos com uma taxa de sucesso de inclusão de 81%, idade média 69,1 anos, 83% mulheres, média de 3,2 níveis operados. Taxa de sobrevida do nível L5S1 foi de 89,6% em cinco anos de seguimento. Não encontramos significância estatística entre os grupos nos parâmetros avaliados. Conclusão: A taxa de sobrevida de L5S1 foi de 89,6% após LLIF de 3-4 níveis até L5 em cinco anos de seguimento. Estaticamente não foram encontrados fatores de risco que justifiquem inclusão pré-operatória de L5S1. Nível de Evidência III; Estudo Retrospectivo.

RESUMEN Objetivos: Objetivos: La inclusión o no de L5-S1 en fusiones lumbares de múltiples niveles aún no es un consenso en la literatura. La opción de preservar L5-S1 mantiene el segmento móvil y la posibilidad de un ajuste natural a la alineación sagital de la columna lumbar. Sin embargo, una fusión larga por encima de L5-S1 puede acelerar el proceso degenerativo y puede ser necesaria una extensión al sacro en el futuro. En este estudio, evaluamos la supervivencia del nivel L5-S1 después de la fusión intersomática lumbar lateral (LLIF) de 3-4 niveles hasta L5 e intentamos identificar los factores de riesgo que podrían guiar la selección de casos. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo en un solo centro. Inclusión: Pacientes que se sometieron a fusión intersomática (LLIF) de 3-4 niveles a L5 debido a enfermedad degenerativa de la columna vertebral con al menos 5 años de seguimiento. Exclusión: Sacralización L5 o anquilosis del disco L5-S1. Se evaluó la tasa de reoperación incluyendo el disco L5-S1. Revisamos las imágenes preoperatorias con respecto al ángulo de Cobb coronal, lordosis lumbar, incidencia pélvica, curva fraccional distal, clasificación radiográfica DDD (modificada por Weiner y Pfirrmann), así como parámetros demográficos,. Estos parámetros se compararon entre el grupo de casos (nueva operación) y el grupo control. Resultados: Se incluyeron 41 pacientes que alcanzaron una tasa de éxito de inclusión del 81%; la edad promedio fue de 69,1 años, el 83% eran mujeres y el promedio de los niveles operados fue de 3,2. La tasa de supervivencia del nivel de L5-S1 fue del 89,6% a los 5 años de seguimiento. No encontramos diferencias entre los grupos con respecto al parámetro evaluado. Conclusiones: La tasa de supervivencia de L5-S1 fue del 89,6% después de LLIF de 3-4 niveles hasta L5 a los 5 años de seguimiento. Estadísticamente, no se observaron factores de riesgo que justificaran la inclusión preoperatoria de L5-S1. Nivel de Evidencia III; Estudio Retrospectivo.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: To develop a version of the Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI), translated into Portuguese and culturally adapted for the Brazilian population. Methods: The well-established process of translation into Portuguese and back translation into English was used together with cultural adaptation. Results: Five bilingual translators (English and Portuguese) performed the translation of the Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI) from English to Portuguese based on interactive discussions used to arrive at a consensus translation. The translated version of LSDI was then translated into English by a native English-speaking translator who did not know the concepts involved in LSDI. The original LSDI and back translation were compared by a committee formed by the translators responsible for translating the original into Portuguese and a North-American spine surgeon, and because they were considered equivalent, the final version of the LSDI translated into Portuguese and culturally adapted was defined. Conclusions: In order to facilitate global and cross-cultural comparisons of the influence of lumbar stiffness related to spinal arthrodesis in daily activities, this study presents a version of LSDI that has been translated into Portuguese and culturally adapted for the Brazilian population. Level of Evidence; Not Applicable. Prospective Study.

RESUMO Objetivos: Desenvolver uma versão do Lumbar Stiffness Disability (LSDI) Index, traduzido para o português e culturalmente adaptado para a população brasileira. Métodos: O processo bem estabelecido de tradução para o português e contra-tradução para o inglês foi empregado juntamente com a adaptação cultural. Resultados: Cinco tradutores bilíngües (inglês e português) realizaram a tradução do Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI) do inglês para o português baseada em discussões interativas usadas para chegar a uma tradução consensual. A versão traduzida do LSDI foi então traduzida para o inglês por um tradutor nativo de língua inglesa que não sabia os conceitos envolvidos com o LSDI. O LSDI original e a retrotradução foram comparadas por comitê contendo os tradutores responsáveis pela tradução do original para o português e com um cirurgião de coluna vertebral norte americano, e por serem consideradas equivalentes, a versão final do LSDI traduzida para o Português e adaptada culturalmente foi definida. Conclusão: Para facilitar comparações globais e transculturais da influência da rigidez lombar relacionada a artrodese de coluna vertebral nas atividades diárias, este estudo estudo apresenta uma versão do LSDI que foi traduzida para o português e adaptada culturalmente para a população brasileira. Nível de Evodencia; Não Aplicável. Trabalho Prospectivo.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Desarrollar una versión del Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI) traducido al portugués y culturalmente adaptada a la población brasileña. Métodos: El proceso bien establecido de la traducción al portugués y viceversa traducida al inglés se utilizó junto con la adaptación cultural. Resultados: Cinco traductores bilingües (inglés y portugués) llevaron a cabo la traducción del Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI) del inglés al portugués basada en debates interactivos utilizados para llegar a una traducción consensual. La versión traducida del LSDI fue entonces traducida al inglés por un traductor nativo de lengua inglesa que no conocía los conceptos involucrados con el LSDI. El texto original y la copia de la traducción se compararon por un comité formado por los traductores responsables de la traducción del original al portugués y un cirujano de la columna vertebral norteamericano, y cómo se consideran equivalentes, la versión final traducida al portugués y culturalmente adaptada del LSDI se ha definido. Conclusiones: Para facilitar comparaciones globales y transculturales de la influencia de la rigidez lumbar relacionada con la artrodesis de columna vertebral en las actividades diarias, este estudio presenta una versión del LSDI que ha sido traducida al portugués y culturalmente adaptada a la población brasileña. Nivel de Evidencia; No se aplica. Estudio Prospectivo.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The present study aims to describe the results of full-videoendoscopic surgery through the interlaminar route for central lumbar disc herniation in a series of 50 cases in Brazil. This is a retrospective single-center study. With the aim of describing safety, the present study reports the complication and revision rates. The clinical results were collected with the visual analogue scale (VAS) and with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (a questionnaire to evaluate functional disability) at the preoperative visit and at 6 months postsurgery. The average surgical time was 20 minutes (range: 9­40 minutes), and 100% of the procedures were performed in an outpatient setting. The mean VAS scores improved from 9.4 to 1.1 (p < 0.001), and the mean ODI scores decreased from 69 to 9 points in the last follow-up (p < 0.001). There was 1 case (2%) with hernia recurrence, 1 case with intraoperative root injury (2%), and 2 cases (4%) that required lumbar fusion due to a preexisting instability. No infections were observed. The full-videoendoscopic surgery is a modern option for treating lumbar disc herniation. In the present study, we have observed that the use of this technique for the removal of fragments affecting the vertebral canal presented satisfactory clinical results, low complication rates, and that it has demonstrated its feasibility in an outpatient setting without prolonged hospitalization.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Total lumbar disc replacement (TDR) devices have been designed to maintain motion, but both biomechanical and clinical data have indicated that a more controlled motion and additional load absorption in TDR would be beneficial. This work analyzed long-term results of an elastomeric disc (Physio-L) for degenerative lumbar conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective, noncomparative, single-center clinical and radiological study. A total of 15 patients with predominant low back pain due degenerative disc disease received anterior total disc replacement with a Physio-L disc. Clinical outcomes were assessed both with a visual analog scale for pain and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaires. Radiological outcomes included implant failure, range of motion (ROM), facet degeneration, and adjacent level disease. Complication and reoperation rates were also recorded. The cases were assessed with a minimum follow-up of 84 months. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients were enrolled (20 TDRs)-10 single-level cases (L5S1) and 5 two-level cases (L4L5/L5S1). After 84 months, clinical outcomes scores still demonstrated significant improvement compared with baseline (P < .001). Mean visual analog scale scores dropped from 7.1 to 2.9, and the Oswestry Disability Index improved from 50 to 16. No disc has experienced migration or breakage. The average range of motion value went from a baseline of 12.0° to 13.3° at 12 months, and at the final follow-up it decreased to 9.9°. Regarding the double-level cases, 3 of 5 (60%) had adverse events; just 1 single-level (10%) had adverse events. At final follow-up, radiological signs of facet degeneration were present in 7 of 15 patients (47%) but with only 1 of 15 (6.7%) symptomatic. Two patients (13%) required surgery at the adjacent level. At the 84-month follow-up, 16 of 18 prostheses (89%) were still active (2 revised to fusion and 2 were lost to follow-up). CONCLUSION: The long-term follow-up data shows satisfactory clinical results for the use of Physio-L elastomeric TDR in the treatment of degenerative disc disease. Studies with bigger cohorts are needed to replicate results and add new information regarding other details.

RESUMO

A hérnia medular idiopática (HMI) é uma causa rara de mielopatia progressiva que afeta principalmente mulheres de meia idade com apresentação clínica típica com a Síndrome de Brown-Sequard. Possui etiologia incerta, sendo a teoria mais aceita a de ser um defeito congênito na dura-máter que leva a uma herniação lenta e progressiva da medula que ocasiona uma lesão evolutiva, podendo levar a um déficit irreversível quando subdiagnosticado e não tratado da forma ideal. A realização da ressonância magnética é fundamental para o diagnóstico, e a cirurgia é o tratamento de escolha para reverter e cessar os sintomas mielopáticos. O presente artigo mostra um caso de uma apresentação atípica da localização do defeito dural e da herniação, não descrita ainda na literatura, levando a uma apresentação neurológica e anatômica incomum para esta patologia, obrigando a realizar um planejamento cirúrgico específico para tal caso.

Idiopathic medullary hernia is a rare cause of progressive myelopathy, primarily affecting middle-aged women, typical clinical presentation with Brown-Sequárd Syndrome. Its etiology is uncertain, but the most accepted theory is that a congenital defect in the dura mater leads to a slow and progressive spinal cord herniation, causing an evolutionary spinal cord injury, which can lead to an irreversible deficit when underdiagnosed and not treated adequately. Magnetic resonance imaging is essential for the diagnosis, and surgery is the treatment of choice to reverse and stop myelopathy symptoms. The present article shows a case of an atypical presentation of the location of the dural defect and herniation, not yet described in the literature, leading to an unusual neurologic and anatomical presentation for this pathology, requiring a specific planning for this case.

Assuntos

RESUMO

With the proliferation of a variety of modern MIS spine surgery procedures, it is mandatory that the surgeon dominate all aspects involved in surgical indication. The information related to the decision making in patient selection for specific procedures is mandatory for surgical success. The objective of this study is to present decision-making criteria in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) selection for a variety of patients and pathologies. In this article, practicing surgeons who specialize in various MIS approaches for spinal fusion were engaged to provide expert opinion and literature review on decision making criteria for several MIS procedures. Pros, cons, relative limitations, and case examples are provided for patient selection in treatment with MIS posterolateral fusion (MIS-PLF), mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion (mini-ALIF), lateral interbody fusion (LLIF), MIS posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-PLIF) and MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). There is a variety of aspects to consider when deciding which modern MIS surgical approach is most appropriate to use based on patient and pathologic characteristics. The surgeon must adapt them to the characteristic of each type of patients, helping them to choose the most effective and efficient therapeutic option for each case.