RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and impact of gene-expression assays (GEAs) on treatment decisions in a real-world setting of early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients. METHODS: This is a regional, prospective study promoted by the Council Health Authorities in Madrid. Enrolment was offered to women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-negative or micrometastatic, stage I or II breast cancer from 21 hospitals in Madrid. Treatment recommendations were recorded before and after knowledge of tests results. An economic model compared the cost-effectiveness of treatment, guided by GEAs or by common prognostic factors. RESULTS: 907 tests (440 Oncotype DX® and 467 MammaPrint®) were performed between February 2012 and November 2014. Treatment recommendation changed in 42.6% of patients. The shift was predominantly from chemohormonal (CHT) to hormonal therapy (HT) alone, in 30.5% of patients. GEAs increased patients' confidence in treatment decision making. Tumor grade, progesterone receptor positivity and Ki67 expression were associated with the likelihood of change from CHT to HT (P < 0.001) and from HT to CHT (P < 0.001). Compared with current clinical practice genomic testing increased quality-adjusted life years by 0.00787 per patient and was cost-saving from a national health care system (by 13.867 per patient) and from a societal perspective (by 32.678 per patient). CONCLUSION: Using GEAs to guide adjuvant therapy in ESBC is cost-effective in Spain and has a significant impact on treatment decisions.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/economia , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Everolimus with exemestane has shown promising activity in patients with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer. It is necessary, therefore, to characterize the safety profile of this new combination in the real-world clinical setting and in the broadest possible population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post-menopausal women with HR-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer progressing after prior non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs) were included. The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate the safety profile of this combination in a subset of Spanish patients in the BALLET trial and to characterize grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs) in routine clinical practice in Spain. RESULTS: Between September 2012 and July 2013, 429 patients (20% of the overall study population) were included in the BALLET study in 52 hospitals in Spain, of whom 100 (23%) were ≥ 70 years. The median treatment duration was 3.14 and 3.03 months for exemestane and everolimus, respectively. The most common reasons for discontinuation of treatment were local reimbursement of everolimus (43%), followed by disease progression (31%) and the incidence of AEs (15%). The most frequent AEs causing permanent discontinuation were pneumonitis (4%), asthenia (2%) and stomatitis (2%). Overall, 87% of patients experienced at least one AE of any grade, 30% of patients at least one grade 3 AE and 2% of patients a grade 4 AE. CONCLUSION: The safety profile in Spanish patients of the BALLET trial is consistent with the results obtained in the overall population of the trial, as well as in previous clinical trials.