Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cir Cir ; 90(5): 678-683, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36327481

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To know the limitations that the students encountered during the undergraduate surgery course during COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: Through an online questionnaire, students were asked about the evaluation of the undergraduate surgery course, the limitations encountered during the course, both those perceived by themselves, and the limitations they perceived in teachers. Questions were asked about the total evaluation of the surgery course and the clinical part of the course. RESULTS: 63 students of the subject of surgery were included. The most mentioned limitations of the students were the availability of schedule and teaching material. The most mentioned limitation in relation to the teachers was the lack of technical knowledge. A relationship was found between the evaluation of the course and the interaction between the teacher and the student. CONCLUSIONS: The medical education have undergone great changes, especially the clinical part. There are several limitations in this process that can be improved by teachers and students and the perception of the quality of the course is related to the degree of interaction that teachers had with the students.


OBJETIVO: Conocer las limitaciones que los estudiantes encontraron durante el curso de pregrado de cirugía durante la pandemia de COVID-19. MÉTODO: Mediante un cuestionario en línea, se interrogó a los estudiantes acerca de la evaluación del curso de cirugía de pregrado y las limitaciones encontradas durante el curso, tanto las percibidas por ellos mismos como las que percibieron en sus maestros. Se preguntó acerca de la evaluación total del curso de cirugía y de la parte clínica del curso. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 63 estudiantes de la materia de cirugía. Las limitaciones de los estudiantes más mencionadas fueron la disponibilidad de horario y de material didáctico. La limitación más mencionada en relación a los maestros fue la falta de conocimientos técnicos. Se encontró relación entre la evaluación del curso y la interacción que se tuvo entre el maestro y el estudiante. CONCLUSIONES: La educación en medicina ha sufrido grandes cambios, sobre todo la parte clínica. Existen diversas limitaciones en este proceso que pueden mejorarse por parte de maestros y estudiantes, y la percepción de la calidad del curso está relacionada con el grado de interacción que los maestros tuvieron con los estudiantes.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
J Surg Res ; 279: 657-665, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35932720

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: To determine whether the local administration of insulin glargine compared with placebo in nondiabetic patients with venous ulcers (VUs) leads to increased wound healing. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial using a split-plot design was performed in 36 adults with leg VUs >25 cm2 and more than 3 mo of evolution. Each hemi-wound received either 10 UI insulin glargine or saline solution once a day for 7 d. Size of the wounds, thermal asymmetry, the number of blood vessels, and the percentage area of collagen content in wound biopsies were assessed at baseline and after 7 d of treatment. Blood capillary glucose was monitored once a day after the insulin injection. RESULTS: After 7 d of treatment, the hemi-wounds treated with insulin glargine were significantly smaller, had less thermal asymmetry, more blood vessels, and more collagen content than the saline-treated side. Correlation between thermal asymmetry and the number of blood vessels was also found (r2 = 66.2, P < 0.001). No patient presented capillary glucose levels ≤3.3 mmol/L nor any adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: In nondiabetic patients with chronic VUs, the topical administration of insulin glargine seems to be safe and promotes wound healing and tissue repair after 7 d of treatment.


Assuntos
Úlcera Varicosa , Adulto , Glicemia , Humanos , Insulina Glargina/farmacologia , Insulina Glargina/uso terapêutico , Solução Salina , Úlcera , Úlcera Varicosa/tratamento farmacológico , Cicatrização
3.
Surg Today ; 51(5): 703-712, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33040236

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To validate the Inguinal Pain Questionnaire (IPQ) in the Spanish Language and test its use in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of hernia repair using the Lichtenstein technique vs. the ONSTEP technique. We simplified the IPQ using a principal component analysis (PCA) approach as a secondary objective. METHODS: The IPQ was translated into Spanish and validated in a cohort of 21 patients. Thereafter, 40 patients were randomized to undergo hernia repair by the Lichtenstein technique or the ONSTEP technique. IPQ and pain visual analogue (VAS) score trends over time were compared using a repeated-measures mixed-effects model. RESULTS: The Spanish version of the IPQ showed an internal consistency similar to that of the original score. No significant differences were found in the IPQ responses, pain VAS, or the rate of self-reported pain between patients who underwent the Lichtenstein technique and those who underwent the ONSTEP technique. Following PCA analysis, the number of items on the IPQ was reduced from 18 to 10. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the IPQ measures postoperative inguinal pain adequately. Based on our findings, the ONSTEP technique was not superior to the Lichtenstein technique. The simplified version of the IPQ is not significantly different from the full version and it is easier to complete. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04138329, registered on October 24, 2019.


Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/epidemiologia , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Feminino , Humanos , Idioma , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Autorrelato
4.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 51(3): e13474, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33336385

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Despite being widely used as a screening tool, a rigorous scientific evaluation of infrared thermography for the diagnosis of minimally symptomatic patients suspected of having COVID-19 infection has not been performed. METHODS: A consecutive sample of 60 adult individuals with a history of close contact with COVID-19 infected individuals and mild respiratory symptoms for less than 7 days and 20 confirmed COVID-19 negative healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. Infrared thermograms of the face were obtained with a mobile camera, and RT-PCR was used as the reference standard test to diagnose COVID-19 infection. Temperature values and distribution of the face of healthy volunteers and patients with and without COVID-19 infection were then compared. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients had an RT-PCR confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and 26 had negative test results. The temperature asymmetry between the lacrimal caruncles and the forehead was significantly higher in COVID-19 positive individuals. Through a random forest analysis, a cut-off value of 0.55°C was found to discriminate with an 82% accuracy between patients with and without COVID-19 confirmed infection. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with a history of COVID-19 exposure and mild respiratory symptoms, a temperature asymmetry of ≥ 0.55°C between the lacrimal caruncle and the forehead is highly suggestive of COVID-19 infection. This finding questions the widespread use of the measurement of absolute temperature values of the forehead as a COVID-19 screening tool.


Assuntos
Temperatura Corporal , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Olho , Testa , Termografia/métodos , Adulto , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Raios Infravermelhos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
5.
Pain Res Manag ; 2016: 4372617, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27445611

RESUMO

Background and Objective. Pain evaluation in children can be a difficult task, since it possesses sensory and affective components that are often hard to discriminate. Infrared thermography has previously been used as a diagnostic tool for pain detection in animals; therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the presence of temperature changes during dental extractions and to evaluate its correlation with heart rate changes as markers of pain and discomfort. Methods. Thermographic changes in the lacrimal caruncle and heart rate measurements were recorded in healthy children scheduled for dental extraction before and during the procedure and compared. Afterwards, correlation between temperature and heart rate was assessed. Results. We found significant differences in temperature and heart rate before the procedure and during the dental extraction (mean difference 4.07°C, p < 0.001, and 18.11 beats per minute, p < 0.001) and no evidence of correlation between both measurements. Conclusion. Thermographic changes in the lacrimal caruncle can be detected in patients who undergo dental extractions. These changes appear to be stable throughout time and to possess very little intersubject variation, thus making them a candidate for a surrogate marker of pain and discomfort. Future studies should be performed to confirm this claim.


Assuntos
Medição da Dor/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Temperatura , Extração Dentária/efeitos adversos , Criança , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/fisiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Estatística como Assunto , Termografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA