RESUMO

Background: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) can affect any soft tissue and skin of the body. Its progression is rapid and it is associated with a high mortality rate. Therefore, the search for easily accessible and low-cost biomarkers that could predict the prognosis of patients with NF is necessary. Objective: To evaluate the role of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictor of mortality in patients with NF. Material and methods: Observational, cross-sectional, retrospective and analytical study of patients admitted between April and October 2020 in a tertiary-care hospital. The statistical tests used for the comparison of variables between the study groups were chi-square, Fisher's exact, Student's t and Mann-Whitney U. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to determine the accuracy of NLR in predicting mortality in patients with NF. Results: A total of 25 patients were included and stratified into non-survivors and survivors. The non-survivor group had an elevated NLR value compared to survivors (15.57 [13.75] vs. 7.91 [4.13]; p = 0.065). The NLR had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.729 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.516-0.886; p = 0.044), sensitivity of 77.78% (40-97.2), and specificity of 75% (47.6-92.7). The optimal cut-off point obtained for NLR was > 9.21. Conclusions: An NLR value > 9.21 could be a predictor of mortality in patients with NF.

Introducción: la fascitis necrotizante (FN) puede afectar cualquier tejido blando y piel del cuerpo. Su progresión es rápida y está relacionada con un índice de mortalidad alto. Por lo tanto, la búsqueda de biomarcadores de fácil acceso y bajo costo que puedan predecir el pronóstico de los pacientes con FN es necesaria. Objetivo: evaluar el papel del índice neutrofilo-linfocito (INL) como un predictor de mortalidad en los pacientes con FN. Material y métodos: estudio observacional, transversal, retrospectivo y analítico de pacientes admitidos entre abril y octubre del 2020 en un hospital de tercer nivel. Las pruebas estadísticas utilizadas para la comparación de las variables entre los grupos de estudio fueron chi cuadrado, exacta de Fisher, t de Student y U de Mann-Whitney. Una curva característica operativa del receptor (ROC) fue realizada para determinar la precisión del INL en la predicción de mortalidad en pacientes con FN. Resultados: un total de 25 pacientes fueron incluidos y estratificados en no sobrevivientes y sobrevivientes. El grupo no sobreviviente tuvo un valor elevado del INL en comparación con los sobrevivientes (15.57 [13.75] frente a 7.91 [4.13]; p = 0.065). El INL tuvo un área bajo la curva (AUC) de 0.729 (intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%] 0.516-0.886; p = 0.044), sensibilidad de 77.78% (40-97.2) y especificidad de 75% (47.6-92.7). El punto de corte óptimo obtenido para el INL fue > 9.21. Conclusiones: un valor de INL > 9.21 podría ser un predictor de mortalidad en los pacientes con FN.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bile duct injury (BDI) repair surgery is usually associated with morbidity/mortality. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) easily assesses a patient's inflammatory status. The study aims to determine the possible relationship between preoperative NLR (pNLR) with postoperative outcomes in BDI repair surgery. METHODS: Approved Ethics/Research Committee retrospective study, in patients who had a Bismuth-Strasberg type E BDI repair (2008-2023). Data registered was: morbidity, mortality, and long-term outcomes (primary patency and loss of primary patency) (Kaplan-Meier). Group comparison (U Mann-Whitney), receiver operator characteristic (ROC): area under curve [AUC]; cut-off value, and Youden index [J], and logistic regression analysis were used for pNLR evaluation. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were studied. Mean age was 44.4 years. E2 was the commonest BDI (38.4%). Perioperative morbidity/mortality was 31.5% and 1.4%. Primary patency was 95.9%. 8.2% have lost primary patency (3-year actuarial patency: 85.3%). Median pNLR was higher in patients who had any complication (4.84 vs. 2.89 p = 0.015), biliary complications (5.29 vs. 2.86 p = 0.01), and patients with loss of primary patency (5.22 vs. 3.1 p = 0.08). AUC's, cut-off values and (J) were: any complication (0.678, pNLR = 4.3, J = 0.38, p = 0.007), serious complication (0.667, pNLR = 4.3, J = 0.34, p = 0.04), biliary complications (0.712, pNLR = 3.64, J = 0.46, p = 0.001), and loss of primary patency (0.716, pNLR = 3.24, J = 0.52, p = 0.008). Logistic regression was significant in any complication (Exp [B]: 0.1, p = 0.002), serious complications (Exp [B]: 0.2, p = 0.03), and biliary complications (Exp [B]: 8.1, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: pNLR is associated with complications in BDI repair with moderate to acceptable predictive capacity. pNLR could potentially predict patency of a BDI repair.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is defined by its surgical outcomes, including operative time, conversion to open surgery, bile duct and/or vascular injury. Difficult LC can be graded based on intraoperative findings. The main objective of this study is to apply and validate the reliability of their proposed risk score to predict the operative difficulty of an LC, based on their own validated intraoperative scale. Single-center prospective cohort study from 01/2020-12-2023. 367 patients > 18 years who underwent LC were included. The preoperative risk scale and intraoperative grading system were registered. Surgical outcomes were determined. Predictive accuracy was evaluated by the Receiver Operator Characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values, and Youden's Index (J). Patients' mean age was 44.1 ± 15.3 years. According to the risk score, 39.5% LC were "low" risk difficulty, 49.3% were "medium" risk, and 11.2% were "high" risk difficult LC. Based on the intraoperative grading system, 31.9% were difficult LC (Nassar grades 3-4) and 68.1% were easy LC (Nassar grades 1-2). There was a statistically significant correlation (0.428, p < 0.05) between the preoperative risk score and the intraoperative grading system. The AUC for the preoperative risk score scale and intraoperative difficult LC was 0.735 (95% CI 0.687-0.779) (J: 0.34). A preoperative risk score > 1.5 had an 83.7% sensitivity and a 50.8% specificity for intraoperative difficult LC. A predictive preoperative score for difficult LC and a routine collection of the intraoperative difficulty should be implemented to improve surgical outcomes and surgical planning.

RESUMO

COVID-19 has a mortality rate exceeding 5.4 million worldwide. The early identification of patients at a high risk of mortality is essential to save their lives. The AST-to-lymphocyte ratio index (ALRI) is a novel biomarker of survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, an organ susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection. For this study, the prognostic value of ALRI as a marker of COVID-19 mortality was evaluated. For this purpose, ALRI was compared with the main biomarkers for COVID-19 mortality (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], systemic immune-inflammation index [SII], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR], lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)/lymphocyte ratio [LDH/LR]). A retrospective cohort of 225 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and without chronic liver disease was evaluated. In the non-survival group, the ALRI, NLR, SII, and LDH/LR were significantly higher than in the survival group (pcorrected < 0.05). ALRI had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81, a sensitivity of 70.37%, and a specificity of 75%, with a best cut-off value >42.42. COVID-19 patients with high ALRI levels had a mean survival time of 7.8 days. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that ALRI > 42.42 (HR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.35-3.97; pcorrected = 0.01) was a prognostic factor of COVID-19 mortality. These findings prove that ALRI is an independent predictor of COVID-19 mortality and that it may help identify high-risk subjects with SARS-CoV-2 infection upon admission.

RESUMO

Background: Colon leakage score (CLS) was developed for risk prediction of anastomotic leak (AL) in the left-sided colorectal surgery. Although the risk factors for leakage are well known and accepted by the surgical community, an accurate forecast of AL is still a difficult task. Objective: The study aims to apply the CLS in patients undergoing left-sided colorectal surgery. Methods: Retrospective study in patients with the left-sided colorectal surgery and primary anastomosis without diverting stoma. CLS was calculated in patients, who were classified in AL and NO-AL groups. Predictive value of CLS was evaluated by receiver operator characteristic. Correlation between CLS and AL was determined. 208 patients (55% male, mean age 59 years) were included in the study. Results: Overall, AL was 7.2%. Mean CLS of all patients was 7.2 ± 3.2 (0-17). Patients with AL had a higher CLS (11.8 ± 2.3) than NO-AL patients (6.8 ± 3) (p = 0.0001). The area under the curve for the prediction of AL by CLS was 0.898 ([CI] 0.829-0.968, p = 0.0001). A CLS of 8.5 had 93% sensitivity and 72% specificity. There was a statistically significant odds ratio for CLS and AL (0.58: [CI] 0.46-0.73, p = 0.0001). Conclusion: CLS is a useful tool to predict AL in the left-sided colorectal surgery.

Antecedentes: La puntuación de fugas de colon (CLS) se desarrolló para la predicción del riesgo de fuga anastomótica (AL) en la cirugía colorrectal del lado izquierdo, con la finalidad de obtener un pronóstico preciso. Objetivo: Este estudio tiene el objetivo de aplicar el CLS en pacientes con cirugía colorrectal de lado izquierdo. Método: Estudio retrospectivo en pacientes con cirugía colorrectal izquierda y anastomosis primaria sin estoma de derivación. Se calculó el CLS en los pacientes, los cuales fueron clasificados en los grupos con AL y sin AL. Resultados: La media del CLS de todos los pacientes fue de 7.2 ± 3.2 (0-17). Los pacientes con AL tenían un CLS más alto (11.8 ± 2.3) que los pacientes sin AL (6.8 ± 3) (p = 0.0001). El área bajo la curva para la predicción de la AL mediante el CLS fue de 0.898 (intervalo de confianza (CI) 0.829-0.968; p = 0.0001). Un CLS de 8.5 tuvo una sensibilidad del 93% y una especificidad del 72%. Además, se obtuvo un Odds Ratio con una diferencia estadísticamente significativa para el CLS y AL (0.58; CI 0.46-0.73; p = 0.0001). Conclusión: La CLS es una herramienta útil para predecir la AL en la cirugía colorrectal del lado izquierdo.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) operative time (CholeS score) and conversion to an open procedure (CLOC score) outside their validation dataset in Mexican population. METHODS: Patients >18 years who underwent elective LC were analyzed in a single-center retrospective chart review study. Association between scores (CholeS and CLOC) with operative time and conversion to open procedures was assessed with Spearman correlation. The predictive accuracy of the CholeS score and CLOC score was evaluated by receiver operator characteristic. RESULTS: 200 patients were included in the study (33 excluded for emergency case or missing data). Spearman coefficient correlations between CholeS or CLOC score and operative time were 0.456 (p < 0.0001) and 0.356 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Area under the curve (AUC) for operative prediction time (>90 min) by CholeS score was 0.786 with a 3.5-point cutoff (80% sensitivity and 63.2% specificity). AUC for open conversion (CLOC score) was 0.78 with a 5-point cutoff (60% sensitivity and 91% specificity). The CLOC score had a 0.740 AUC (64% sensitivity and 72.8% specificity) for operative time >90 min. CONCLUSIONS: The CholeS and the CLOC scores predicted LC long operative time and risk for conversion to an open procedure, respectively, outside their original validation set.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: Although the negative impact on fertility of men recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been suggested, there is insufficient evidence, and the data are limited and contradictory. The present prospective study aimed to evaluate the sex-related hormones, semen parameters, erectile dysfunction (ED), and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in a cohort of men who recovered from COVID-19 and age-matched control men. Methods: Semen samples were collected from twenty-two men recovered from COVID-19 with a median time of 91.5 days and thirty-six control males. The semen parameters were evaluated according to the World Health Organization (WHO) laboratory manual to examine and process human semen. The blood samples were collected to assess the male hormone profile. ED and LUTS were evaluated with the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), respectively. Results: The follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (3.819±1.515 IU/L), luteinizing hormone (LH) (4.023±1.792 IU/L), prolactin (PRL) [12.60 (10.72-15.20) ng/mL], and testosterone (T) [4.345 (3.565-5.525) ng/mL] levels were at normal range in all males enrolled in the study. Levels of semen volume (control: 2.5 mL vs. COVID-19: 1.9 mL; P<0.05) and sperm concentration (control: 59×106/mL vs. COVID-19: 41.5×106/mL; P<0.005) were significantly lower in males recovered from COVID-19, but still technically well within normal regardless of WHO edition. All variables were examined through logistic regression analysis, demonstrating that only sperm concentration was an independent variable associated with men recovered from COVID-19 [odds ratio (OR) =1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.999-1.098; P=0.016]. According to correlation analysis, there was no correlation between sperm concentration and other semen parameters and sex-related hormone profiles. Furthermore, an absence of ED and LUTS in men who recovered from COVID-19 was evidenced using the IIEF-5 and IPSS, respectively. Conclusions: Reproductive-age males recovered from COVID-19 have normal sperm concentration. Sperm concentration did not correlate with other semen parameters, sex-related hormones, IIEF-5, and IPSS. Further studies should be performed to evaluate whether the lower sperm concentration and semen volume that were still within the normal range are a transient or prolonged downregulation resulting from the COVID-19 attack.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: There is increasing evidence that patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 develop neurological manifestations such as encephalitis. The purpose of this article was to present a case of viral encephalitis associated with SARS-CoV-2 in a 14-year-old child with Chiari malformation type I. CASE REPORT: The patient manifested frontal headache, nausea, vomiting, skin pallor, right side Babinski sign and was diagnosed with Chiari malformation type I. He was admitted with generalized seizures and suspected encephalitis. Brain inflammation and viral RNA in the cerebrospinal fluid suggested SARS-CoV-2 encephalitis. These findings indicate that the SARS-CoV-2 test in CSF of patients with neurological manifestations, confusion, and fever during the COVID-19 pandemic should be carried out even when there is no evidence of respiratory infection. To our knowledge, this presentation of encephalitis associated with COVID-19 has not yet been reported in a patient with a congenital syndrome such as Chiari malformation type I. CONCLUSION: Further clinical data are needed to determine the complications of encephalitis due to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with Chiari malformation type I to standardize diagnosis and treatment.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus of the optimal arterial and venous sizes on arteriovenous fistula (AVF) function and patency. The purpose of our study was to determine the influence of vein and artery sizes on maturation and patency in autologous first time AVF in a vascular access clinic of Mexican Social Security. METHODS: Approved IRB single-center retrospective study in patients referred for their first AVF from 01/2018/ to 04/2020. Perianastomotic inner vein diameter and single inner artery diameter was recorded by duplex ultrasound. Outcomes were: failure to mature (FTM) and cumulative primary patency survival. RESULTS: Eighty-six AVF's were created (mean age 45.5 ± 15.1 years; 62.8% male; mean BMI 25.9 ± 4.3 kg/m2). About 86% were brachiocephalic AVF. Eight (8.1%) AVF had FTM. Mean follow-up was 19.7 ± 8.5 months. Two-year patency survival was 81.4%. FTM vein and artery diameters (2.1 ± 0.3 and 2.8 ± 0.7 mm respectively) were smaller than successful AVF's (3.1 ± 0.9 and 3.5 ± 0.6 mm) (p < 0.05). ROC curve calculated a 2.15 mm vein diameter cutoff (AUC: 0.86) and a 2.95 mm artery diameter cutoff (AUC: 079) for FTM AVF's (83% sensitivity, 72% specificity both) (p < 0.05). AVF's created with a vein diameter <2.15 mm and <2.95 mm artery diameter had statistically significant lower patency survival than AVF's with larger vein and artery diameters (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Vein diameter <2.15 mm and artery diameter <2.95 mm influences AVF maturation and patency in a Mexican population.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Mexican Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AMHPB) conducted a survey, aiming to gather experience and opinions of HPB surgeons about HPB surgery in the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic year. METHODS: An online survey was conducted (33 items: demographics, patient referral, COVID-19 screening and limitations, hospital occupancy and surgical practice) to AMHPB members and attendees of the previous meetings of the Society through a self-administered questionnaire. Answers were excluded if respondents were not from Latin America. RESULTS: 88 participants answered (47.5 ± 10 years, 94% male and 65.9% Mexicans). About 8% worked in COVID-19 converted hospitals. About 1.1% did not perform pre-operative COVID-19 testing. Polymerase chain reaction (33%) was the most common COVID-19 pre-operative test. The number of patient referrals decreased 62.5%. About 29.5% had one patient who died from COVID-19 during preoperative surgical evaluation. About 64.7% answered that surgical case volume decreased. About 17% and 23% respondents considered that surgical morbidity and mortality increased, respectively. Hospital resources and COVID-19 infection were responsible for change in surgical outcomes. Lack of ICU beds (54%) was the most common cause of surgical cancellation. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 had a strong negative impact on HPB surgery in Mexico and Latin America in terms of patient reference, case volume and surgical outcomes.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La Asociación Mexicana Hepato-Pancreato-Biliar (AMHPB) realizó una encuesta con el objetivo de recopilar experiencias/opiniones de cirujanos HPB sobre cirugía HPB en el 2020 con pandemia COVID-19. MÉTODOS: Se realizó encuesta virtual (33 ítems: demografía, derivación de pacientes, tamizaje/limitaciones COVID-19, ocupación hospitalaria y práctica quirúrgica) a miembros de la AMHPB y asistentes a reuniones previas de la Sociedad a través de un cuestionario autoadministrado. Se excluyeron las respuestas que no fueran de América Latina. RESULTADOS: Respondieron 88 participantes (47.5 ± 10 años, 94% hombres y 65.9% mexicanos). 8% trabajaba en hospitales reconvertidos COVID-19. 1,1% no realizó prueba COVID-19 preoperatoria. La Polymerase chain reaction (33%) fue laprueba preoperatoria COVID-19 más común. Lareferencia de pacientes disminuyó 62,5%. El 29,5% tuvo paciente fallecido por COVID-19 durante la evaluación preoperatoria. 64,7% respondió que el volumen de casos quirúrgicos disminuyó. El 17% y23% consideraron que la morbilidad y mortalidad quirúrgicas aumentaron respectivamente. Los recursos hospitalarios e infección por COVID-19 influyeron en los resultados quirúrgicos. La falta de camas de UCI (54%) fue lo más común en cancelación quirúrgica. CONCLUSIÓN: COVID-19 tuvo un fuerte impacto negativo en la cirugía HPB en México y América Latina en referencia de pacientes, volumen de casos y resultados quirúrgicos.

Assuntos