RESUMO
Hemorrhagic cholecystitis is a rare entity with few cases reported in the literature. We report a case of a 42-year-old man with cirrhosis who presented to the hospital with abdominal pain in the right upper quadrant radiating to the back. Computed tomography scan showed findings consistent with acute cholecystitis. Owing to decompensated cirrhosis, he was not a good candidate for cholecystectomy. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholecystoenterostomy was performed that immediately yielded a large amount of old blood with clots along with some bile consistent with acute hemorrhagic cholecystitis. After the drainage, he had an uneventful hospitalization.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: A recent expert panel issued recommendations about the technical aspects of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) for pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). However, significant technical heterogeneity still exists among endoscopists. AIM: To report the outcomes of our DEN technique and how it differs from a recent expert consensus statement and previous studies. METHODS: Medical records of patients with WON who underwent DEN from September 2016 - May 2019 were queried for the following information: Age, gender, ethnicity, etiology of acute pancreatitis, WON location and size, DEN technical information, adverse events (AEs) and outcomes. Adverse events were graded according to the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Lexicon grading system. Technical success was defined as adequate lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) deployment plus removal of ≥ 90% of necrosum. Clinical success was defined as complete resolution of WON cavity by imaging and resolution of symptoms at ≤ 3 months (mo) after last DEN. Data analysis was performed using mean and standard deviation for continuous variables, frequency and proportion for categorical variables, and median and range for interval data. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients underwent DEN. Most of them were Hispanic and their mean age was 51 ± 17 years. The majority of the collections were located in the body of the pancreas and the mean size was 13 cm ± 5 cm. The most common indication was persistent vomiting. Antibiotics were administered only in cases of infected necrosis. All LAMS were placed without radiological guidance, dilated the same day of deployment and removed after a mean of 27 ± 11 d. Routine cross-sectional imaging immediately after drainage was not performed. The mean interval between DEN sessions was 7 ± 4 d and the mean number of DEN/patient was 3 ± 2. Technical and clinical success rates were both 95%. AEs were seen in 5 patients and included: Sepsis (2), stent migration (1), stent maldeployment (1), perforation (1). The sensitivity and positive predictive value of an occluded LAMS leading to sepsis was 50% and 0.11 respectively. No fatalities were observed. CONCLUSION: Our DEN technique differed significantly from the one recommended by a recent expert panel and the one published in previous studies. Despite these differences excellent clinical outcomes were obtained.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Information regarding Hispanics with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is scarce. In this study we aimed to describe a predominantly Hispanic population with IBD in a city located along the US-Mexico border and to identify clinical or demographic differences between Hispanics and non-Hispanics. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of patients with IBD between 2003 and 2013 at a tertiary care center. Information collected included age, sex, ethnicity, diagnosis, diagnosis status (new vs old), endoscopic extent of disease (EOD), extraintestinal manifestations, medical treatment, and surgeries performed. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using a two-sided unpaired t test/Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Fisher exact test, respectively. Results with P ≤ 5% were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Hispanics accounted for 71% of the population sample. A total of 141 patients (68%) were diagnosed as having ulcerative colitis (UC) and 67 (32%) as having Crohn disease (CD). The only statistically significant differences between Hispanics and non-Hispanics were older age at diagnosis and a higher proportion of new diagnoses in Hispanics with CD (P = 0.008 and 0.009, respectively) The most common EOD in patients with UC was extensive colitis, whereas isolated colonic disease predominated in CD, regardless of ethnicity. Immunomodulators and biologics were used in 3% and 1% of cases, respectively. Treatment regimens were similar in both ethnic groups. Patients with CD were more likely than those with UC to have undergone surgery (27% vs 11%, P = 0.004). Surgery rates did not differ between Hispanics and non-Hispanics. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, UC was more common than CD, and the EOD of both conditions differed from the one previously described in other Hispanic populations in the United States. The use of immunomodulators and biologics is the lowest reported to date in the country. No clinically relevant differences were seen between Hispanics and non-Hispanics.