RESUMO
Prompt and precise identification of carbapenemase-producing organisms is crucial for guiding clinical antibiotic treatments and limiting transmission. Here, we propose modifying the Blue Carba test (BCT) and Carba NP-direct (CNPd) to identify molecular carbapenemase classes, including dual carbapenemase strains, by adding specific Class A and Class B inhibitors. We tested 171 carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli strains-21 in Class A (KPC, NMC, SME), 58 in Class B (IMP, VIM, NDM, SPM), and 92 with dual carbapenemase production (KPC+NDM, KPC+IMP, KPC+VIM), all previously positive with BCT or CNPd. We also included 13 carbapenemase non-producers. ß-lactamases were previously characterized by PCR. The improved BCT/CNPd methods detect imipenem hydrolysis from an imipenem-cilastatin solution, using pH indicators and Class A (avibactam) and/or Class B (EDTA) inhibitors. Results were interpreted visually based on color changes. CNPd achieved 99.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity in categorizing carbapenemases, while BCT had 91.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Performance varied by carbapenemase classes: both tests classified all Class A-producing strains. For Class B, the CNP test identified 57/58 strains (98.3%), whereas the BCT test, 45/58 strains (77.6%), with non-fermenters posing the greatest detection challenge. For Classes A plus B dual producers, both tests performed exceptionally well, with only one indeterminate strain for the BCT. The statistical comparison showed both methods had similar times to a positive result, with differences based on the carbapenemase class or bacterial group involved. This improved assay rapidly distinguishes major Class A or Class B carbapenemase producers among Gram-negative bacilli, including dual-class combinations, in less than 2 hours. IMPORTANCE: Rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemase-producing organisms is of vital importance in guiding appropriate clinical antibiotic treatments and curbing their transmission. The emergence of negative bacilli carrying multiple carbapenemase combinations during and after the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has posed a challenge to the conventional biochemical tests typically used to determine the specific carbapenemase type in the isolated strains. Several initiatives have aimed to enhance colorimetric methods, enabling them to independently identify the presence of Class A or Class B carbapenemases. Notably, no previous efforts have been made to distinguish both classes simultaneously. Additionally, these modifications have struggled to differentiate between carriers of multiple carbapenemases, a common occurrence in many Latin American countries. In this study, we introduced specific Class A and Class B carbapenemase inhibitors into the Blue Carba test (BCT) and Carba NP-direct (CNP) colorimetric assays to identify the type of carbapenemase, even in cases of multiple carbapenemase producers within these classes. These updated assays demonstrated exceptional sensitivity and specificity (≥ 90%) all within a rapid turnaround time of under 2 hours, typically completed in just 45 minutes. These in-house enhancements to the BCT and CNP assays present a rapid, straightforward, and cost-effective approach to determining the primary carbapenemase classes. They could serve as a viable alternative to molecular biology or immuno-chromatography techniques, acting as an initial diagnostic step in the process.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Proteínas de Bactérias , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , beta-Lactamases , beta-Lactamases/análise , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , Proteínas de Bactérias/metabolismo , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/enzimologia , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/classificação , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/diagnóstico , Imipenem/farmacologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize the first 14 optrA-carrying linezolid resistant E. faecalis clinical isolates recovered in seven Argentinian hospitals between 2016 and 2021. The epidemiology of optrA-carrying isolates and the optrA genetic context were determined. METHODS: The isolates were phenotypically and genotypically characterized. Susceptibility to 13 antimicrobial agents was performed; clonal relationship was assessed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Data provided by the whole-genome sequencing were used for identification of sequence types, antimicrobial resistance genes, optrA variants, phylogenetic tree, and mobile genetic elements responsible to the dissemination of these strains. RESULTS: All the optrA-carrying E. faecalis isolates were multidrug-resistant and harboured several antimicrobial resistance genes. They carried three optrA variants and belonged to different lineages; however, three of them belonged to the hyperepidemic CC16. Mobile genetic elements were detected in all the isolates. The analysis of the optrA flanking region suggests the plasmidic localization in most of the isolates. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of optrA-mediated linezolid resistance in Argentina. The emergence and dissemination of the optrA genes in clinical E. faecalis isolates are of concern and highlights the importance of initiating the antimicrobial surveillance of Enterococcus spp. under a One Health strategy.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Enterococcus faecalis , Linezolida/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Tipagem de Sequências Multilocus , Argentina , Filogenia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The global spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales has become an epidemiological risk for healthcare systems by limiting available antimicrobial treatments. The COVID-19 pandemic worsened this scenario, prompting the emergence of extremely resistant microorganisms. METHODS: Between March 2020 and September 2021, the NRL confirmed 82 clinical Enterobacterales isolates harboring a combination of blaKPC and MBL genes. Molecular typing was analyzed by PFGE and MLST. Modified double-disk synergy (MDDS) tests were used for phenotypic studies. RESULTS: Isolates were submitted from 28 hospitals located in seven provinces and Buenos Aires City, including 77 K. pneumoniae, 2 K. oxytoca, 2 C. freundii, and 1 E. coli. Almost half of K. pneumoniae isolates (n = 38; 49.4%), detected in 15 hospitals, belong to the CC307 clone. CC11 was the second clone, including 29 (37.7%) isolates (22, ST11 and 7, ST258) from five cities and 12 hospitals. Three isolates belonging to CC45 were also detected. The carbapenemase combinations observed were as follows: 55% blaKPC-2 plus blaNDM-5; 32.5% blaKPC-2 plus blaNDM-1; 5% blaKPC-3 plus blaNDM-1; 5% blaKPC-2 plus blaIMP-8; and 2.5% strain with blaKPC-2 plus blaNDM-5 plus blaOXA-163. Aztreonam/avibactam and aztreonam/relebactam were the most active combinations (100% and 91% susceptible, respectively), followed by fosfomycin (89%) and tigecycline (84%). CONCLUSIONS: The MDDS tests using ceftazidime-avibactam/EDTA and aztreonam/boronic acid disks improved phenotypic classification as dual producers. The successful high-risk clones of K. pneumoniae, such as hyper-epidemic CC307 and CC11 clones, drove the dissemination of double carbapenemase-producing isolates during the COVID-19 pandemic.
RESUMO
CLSI and EUCAST recommend that only broth microdilution (BMD) should be used for routine colistin susceptibility testing; however, this technique can be difficult to perform in resource-poor settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a colistin agar spot test (COL-AS) and a colistin drop test (COL-DT) compared to BMD. COL-AS and COL-DT were assessed with a collection of 271 Gram-negative bacilli clinical isolates: 195 Enterobacterales (including 63 mcr-1 positive strains), 37 Acinetobacter spp., and 39 Pseudomonas aeruginosa For COL-AS, 3.0 µg/ml (final concentration) of colistin was added to a Mueller-Hinton agar plate and subsequently swabbed with a 0.5 McFarland standard suspension of the tested strain within a 1 cm2 spot. For COL-DT, 10 µl of a 16 µg/ml colistin solution was dripped on the surface of a Mueller-Hinton agar plate, previously inoculated with a lawn of the tested strain (0.5 McFarland standard). Colistin solution was made either by dissolving powder or by disk elution in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CA-MHB). Overall, 141/271 (52%) isolates were categorized as colistin resistant by reference BMD. COL-AS yielded a categorical agreement (CA) of 95.5% compared to BMD, with 0.7% very major errors and 3.8% major errors. COL-DT yielded a CA of 96.2% compared to BMD, with 0.7% and 0% very major errors and 3.1% and 3.8% major errors, for colistin powder and disk elution solutions, respectively. Most major errors occurred for mcr-1 strains with MICs that fluctuated from 2 to 4 µg/ml according to the method used. In conclusion, we developed and validated methods suited to the systematic screening of resistance to colistin in Gram-negative bacilli.