RESUMO
Dysphagia lusoria occurs due to compression of the esophagus as an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) crosses the mediastinum. Surgical management includes open, hybrid, and endovascular techniques, with no consensus gold standard. There are few reports of robotic-assisted ARSA resection. We describe the innovative technique and outcomes for two patients who successfully underwent robotic-assisted transthoracic resection of an ARSA after right carotid-subclavian bypass for dysphagia lusoria. Both patients experienced improvement or resolution of their dysphagia and no major complications. In select patients with a noncalcified origin of the ARSA without aneurysmal degeneration, the robotic-assisted approach represents a viable option.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer resection has largely focused on perioperative outcomes (eg, mortality) to benchmark performance. While variations in perioperative outcomes and in utilization of services (eg, ambulatory procedures, hospitalization) have been independently demonstrated, there has been limited evaluation of associations between these outcomes. We evaluated the association between perioperative outcomes and utilization of services to evaluate provider performance across a broader context of care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing lung cancer resection in 2017 to 2019. We utilized hierarchical logistic regression models to determine risk- and reliability-adjusted mortality and risk-adjusted utilization of services, at the hospital-level. We then evaluated utilization of services across quartiles of perioperative mortality. RESULTS: A total of 15,168 patients across 297 hospitals underwent lung cancer resection. Mean risk- and reliability-adjusted 90-day mortality varied between 1.58% (95% CI, 1.54%-1.62%) and 2.74% (95% CI, 2.59%-2.90%) across quartiles. Risk-adjusted utilization of all ambulatory procedures was highest in the best performing (lowest mortality) quartile at 37.7% (95% CI, 33.6%-41.8%). Additionally, risk-adjusted inpatient utilization prior to and after surgery was lowest in the best performing quartile at 15% (95% CI, 13.7%-16.3%) and 19.3% (95% CI, 17.5%-21.0%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals with the lowest perioperative mortality demonstrated trends towards using more outpatient resources prior to surgery, but fewer inpatient services surrounding lung cancer resection. This correlation highlights the importance of incorporating utilization of services in addition to other metrics to profile the efficiency and effectiveness of centers performing lung cancer resection across a broader spectrum of care.