RESUMO
Delayed radiation myelopathy is a rare but severe complication that causes progressive and irreversible patient deterioration. Although it is an exclusion diagnosis, there are factors associated with radiation doses and administration areas that may reduce the risk of its incidence. To date, there is no known first-line and effective treatment available to alleviate the symptoms.
RESUMO
Abstract Introduction Burns are a common trauma that cause acute severe pain in up to 80% of patients. The objective of this narrative review is to evaluate the efficacy of opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol, gabapentinoids, ketamine, and lidocaine in the treatment of acute pain in burn victims. Methodology The databases explored were PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials, and OpenGrey. The included randomized, controlled clinical trials assessed the analgesic efficacy of these drugs on hospitalized patients, had no age limit, patients were in the acute phase of the burn injury and were compared to placebo or other analgesic drugs. Studies describing deep sedation, chronic opioid use, chronic pain, and patients taken to reconstructive surgeries were excluded. The Jadad scale was used to evaluate quality. Results Six randomized controlled clinical trials (397 patients) that evaluated the analgesic efficacy of fentanyl (n = 2), nalbuphine (n = 1), ketamine (n = 1), gabapentin (n = 1), and lidocaine (n = 1) to treat post-procedural pain were included. Fentanyl, nalbuphine, and ketamine were effective, while lidocaine was associated with a slight increase in reported pain and gabapentin showed no significant differences. Two studies were of high quality, one was of medium high quality, and three were of low quality. No studies on the efficacy of NSAIDs or paracetamol were found. Conclusion Evidence of efficacy is very limited. Fentanyl, nalbuphine, and ketamine seem to be effective for controlling acute pain in burn patients, whereas gabapentin and lidocaine did not show any efficacy.
Assuntos
Humanos , Queimaduras/complicações , Analgésicos não Narcóticos , Dor Aguda/etiologia , Dor Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Processual , Ketamina/uso terapêutico , Nalbufina/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Fentanila , Gabapentina , Analgésicos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Lidocaína , AcetaminofenRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Analgesia by specialists with formal training in pain management could be more effective, to find out, the results of a team of an acute pain service will be determined. METHODS: Retrospective study (n = 108) of post-operative (POP) analgesia; two evaluations were taken: before starting analgesics in the immediate POP period and the second at 24 h. A multivariate analysis was performed to establish independent risk factors associated with the effectiveness of the treatment. RESULTS: The effectiveness was 81.48% at 24 h. The risk factors associated with poor management effectiveness were: a comorbidity, prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.22; fibromyalgia (PR = 8.47), and cancer (PR = 2.47). The duration of surgery was associated with poor control PR = 1.10 for each hour elapsed. Protective factors for poor pain control: administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during the POP period (PR = 0.11) and use of analgesia controlled by the patient (PR = 0.29). CONCLUSION: POP pain relief is multifactorial; the participation of specialists was very effective. Identification of risk factors led to closer follow-up.
OBJETIVO: La analgesia por especialistas con entrenamiento formal en manejo del dolor podría ser más efectiva, para averiguarlo se determinarán los resultados de un servicio de dolor agudo. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo (n = 108) de analgesia postoperatoria; se tomaron dos evaluaciones: antes de iniciar analgésicos en el postoperatorio inmediato y la segunda a las 24 horas. Se realizó un análisis multivariado para establecer los factores de riesgo independientes asociados con la efectividad del tratamiento. RESULTADOS: La disminución promedio fue 51,75% en el primer día postoperatorio. La efectividad fue del 81,48% a las 24 horas. Los factores de riesgo asociados con la mala efectividad del manejo fueron: una comorbilidad, razón de prevalencia (RP) = 1,22; fibromialgia (RP = 8,47) y cáncer (RP = 2,47). La duración de la cirugía se asoció con un mal control PR = 1,10 por cada hora transcurrida. Factores protectores para el mal control del dolor: administración de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos durante el postoperatorio (RP = 0,11) y uso de analgesia controlada por el paciente (RP = 0,29). CONCLUSIÓN: el alivio del dolor posoperatorio es multifactorial, la participación de especialistas fue muy eficaz. La identificación de los factores de riesgo condujo a un seguimiento más estrecho.
Assuntos
Analgesia , Clínicas de Dor , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Abstract Introduction: Access to essential medicines, including opioids, is a component of the right to health. Objective: To identify barriers to opioid availability and accessibility for pain and palliative care. Methods: Online survey with Colombian prescribers. Availability barriers were analyzed for each facility (distribution and/or dispensing). Accessibility barriers were analyzed by type. Descriptive analyses were conducted using relative frequencies. Significance within categories and regions was measured using Fisher's exact test. Results: Out of 1,208 prescribers invited, 806 (66.7%) completed the survey. Availability: 76.43% reported barriers. The most cited barrier was "Pharmacies authorized by health insurance companies", where opioids are frequently unavailable. Accessibility: 74.6% reported barriers. Most frequently cited was "Difficulty securing payment authorization for medication from health insurance companies". Significant differences were observed in terms of regions and "Cost" (p=0.02). Lack of coordination among procuring and distributing agencies affects availability. Limited awareness and bureaucratic procedures affect accessibility. Conclusions: There are barriers to opioid availability and access in Colombia, related to the existing structure for guaranteeing equitable supply. From the perspective of healthcare providers, problems related to pharmacy availability, prescription and cost of medicines hinder pain treatment.
Resumen Introducción: El acceso a medicamentos esenciales, incluidos los opioides, es un componente del derecho a la salud. Objetivo: Identificar las barreras de disponibilidad y acceso a los opioides para dolor y cuidados paliativos. Métodos: Encuesta virtual a prescriptores colombianos. Las barreras de disponibilidad se analizaron para cada centro (distribución y/o dispensación) y las barreras de acceso se analizaron por tipo. Los análisis descriptivos se realizaron utilizando frecuencias relativas. La significancia dentro de categorías y regiones se midió utilizando la prueba exacta de Fischer. Resultados: De los 1208 prescriptores invitados, 806 (66.7%) respondieron la encuesta. Disponibilidad: el 76,43% reportó barreras. La barrera más citada fue la relacionada con las "farmacias autorizadas por las aseguradoras de salud", donde los opioides con frecuencia no están disponibles. Acceso: el 74,6% reportó barreras. Se citó con mayor frecuencia la "Dificultad para obtener la autorización de pago de medicamentos por parte de las aseguradoras". Se observaron diferencias significativas entre regiones y "costos" (p=0,02). La falta de coordinación entre las entidades de adquisición y distribución afecta la disponibilidad. La limitada conciencia y los procedimientos burocráticos afectan la accesibilidad. Conclusiones: Existen barreras de disponibilidad y acceso a los opioides en Colombia, las cuales están relacionadas con la estructura disponible para garantizar un suministro equitativo. Desde el punto de vista de los prescriptores, los problemas relacionados con la disponibilidad de las farmacias, la prescripción y el costo de los medicamentos, obstaculizan el tratamiento adecuado del dolor.
Assuntos
Pâncreas DivisumRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Burns are a common trauma that cause acute severe pain in up to 80% of patients. The objective of this narrative review is to evaluate the efficacy of opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol, gabapentinoids, ketamine, and lidocaine in the treatment of acute pain in burn victims. METHODOLOGY: The databases explored were PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials, and OpenGrey. The included randomized, controlled clinical trials assessed the analgesic efficacy of these drugs on hospitalized patients, had no age limit, patients were in the acute phase of the burn injury and were compared to placebo or other analgesic drugs. Studies describing deep sedation, chronic opioid use, chronic pain, and patients taken to reconstructive surgeries were excluded. The Jadad scale was used to evaluate quality. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled clinical trials (397 patients) that evaluated the analgesic efficacy of fentanyl (n = 2), nalbuphine (n = 1), ketamine (n = 1), gabapentin (n = 1), and lidocaine (n = 1) to treat post-procedural pain were included. Fentanyl, nalbuphine, and ketamine were effective, while lidocaine was associated with a slight increase in reported pain and gabapentin showed no significant differences. Two studies were of high quality, one was of medium high quality, and three were of low quality. No studies on the efficacy of NSAIDs or paracetamol were found. CONCLUSION: Evidence of efficacy is very limited. Fentanyl, nalbuphine, and ketamine seem to be effective for controlling acute pain in burn patients, whereas gabapentin and lidocaine did not show any efficacy.
Assuntos
Dor Aguda , Analgésicos não Narcóticos , Queimaduras , Ketamina , Nalbufina , Dor Processual , Acetaminofen , Dor Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Aguda/etiologia , Analgésicos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Queimaduras/complicações , Fentanila , Gabapentina , Humanos , Ketamina/uso terapêutico , Lidocaína , Nalbufina/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
Abstract Introduction Prostatectomy is the standard treatment for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Currently, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is widely used for its advantages, as it provides better visualization, precision, and reduced tissue manipulation. However, RARP requires a multidisciplinary approach in which anesthesia and analgesia management are especially important. Objective This study aims to describe our experience delivering anesthesia for the first cases of patients undergoing RARP in a teaching hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. Methodology An observational study was conducted. We included all patients undergoing RARP from September 2015 to December 2019 at Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá. All patients with incomplete data were excluded. Patient demographics were recorded, and significant perioperative events were reviewed. Results A total of 301 patients were included. At our institution, the mean age for patients undergoing RARP was 61.4 ± 6.7 years. The mean operative time was 205 ± 43 min and mean blood loss was 300 [200400] mL. Only 6 (2%) patients required transfusion. Age and BMI were not associated with clinical outcomes. Conclusions An adequate perioperative approach in RARP is important to minimize complications, which in this study and in this institution were infrequent.
Resumen Introducción La prostatectomía es el tratamiento estándar para pacientes con cáncer de próstata localizado. Actualmente, la prostatectomía radical asistida por robot es ampliamente utilizada por sus ventajas en visualización, precisión y manipulación de los tejidos. Sin embargo, este abordaje requiere un manejo multidisciplinario, pues el enfoque analgésico y anestésico es fundamental para optimizar los desenlaces. Objetivo Describir los primeros casos de prostatectomía radical asistida por robot realizadas en un hospital universitario de cuarto nivel en Bogotá, Colombia. Metodología Estudio observacional en el cual se incluyeron todos los pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía radical asistida por robot (PRAR) en el hospital Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá entre septiembre de 2015 y diciembre de 2019. Se excluyeron los pacientes con historia clínica incompleta. Se registraron los datos demográficos y se revisaron los eventos perioperatorios importantes. Resultados Se analizaron 301 pacientes. La edad media de pacientes sometidos a PRAR fue 61,4 ± 6,7 años. El tiempo quirúrgico promedio fue 205 ± 43 minutos y la pérdida sanguínea media fue 300 [200-400] mL. Solo 6 pacientes (2 %) requirieron transfusión. La edad y el IMC no mostraron una asociación relevante con los desenlaces clínicos. Conclusiones El adecuado abordaje perioperatorio en PRAR es importante para minimizar las complicaciones, las cuales en este estudio y en esta institución fueron infrecuentes.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prostatectomia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Anestesia Geral , Neoplasias da Próstata , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , AnalgesiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Assessment of acute postoperative pain is mandatory for effective treatments. Pain trajectories may help professionals improve treatments. It has been suggested that uncontrolled pain in the immediate postoperative period generates higher pain intensities on the following days of hospital stay. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between pain during the first postoperative hour and the first 24 postoperative hours. METHODS: Setting: a general university hospital. Study design: a prospective observational, analytical study of patients undergoing surgical procedures under general anesthesia and hospitalized for at least 24 hours. Five assessments of pain were carried out during the first hour in the recovery room followed by three assessments during the first 24 hours. The slopes of pain trajectories were calculated, and the relationship between them was analyzed. RESULTS: 234 patients were recruited, 31.3% had uncontrolled pain on arrival at the recovery room; at the end of the first 24 hours after surgery, 5.5% of the patients had uncontrolled pain. The first pain intensity score in the recovery room correlated negatively with the slope for the first hour (P1): rS = -0.657 (p = 0.000). Similarly, the first pain intensity score had a negative association with the pain trajectory slope during the hospital stay (P2): rS = -0.141 (p = 0.032). When comparing the two slopes, a nonsignificant negative correlation was found: rS = -0.126. CONCLUSIONS: the trajectory of pain during the first hour does not predict the behavior of the trajectory during the first day after surgery.
Assuntos
Dor Aguda/fisiopatologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: Assessment of acute postoperative pain is mandatory for effective treatments. Pain trajectories may help professionals improve treatments. It has been suggested that uncontrolled pain in the immediate postoperative period generates higher pain intensities on the following days of hospital stay. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between pain during the first postoperative hour and the first 24 postoperative hours. METHODS: Setting: a general university hospital. Study design: a prospective observational, analytical study of patients undergoing surgical procedures under general anesthesia and hospitalized for at least 24 hours. Five assessments of pain were carried out during the first hour in the recovery room followed by three assessments during the first 24 hours. The slopes of pain trajectories were calculated, and the relationship between them was analyzed. RESULTS: 234 patients were recruited, 31.3% had uncontrolled pain on arrival at the recovery room; at the end of the first 24 hours after surgery, 5.5% of the patients had uncontrolled pain. The first pain intensity score in the recovery room correlated negatively with the slope for the first hour (P1): rS = −0.657 (p = 0.000). Similarly, the first pain intensity score had a negative association with the pain trajectory slope during the hospital stay (P2): rS = −0.141 (p = 0.032). When comparing the two slopes, a nonsignificant negative correlation was found: rS = −0.126. CONCLUSIONS: the trajectory of pain during the first hour does not predict the behavior of the trajectory during the first day after surgery.
RESUMO INTRODUÇÃO: A avaliação da dor pós-operatória aguda é obrigatória para tratamentos eficientes. As trajetórias da dor podem ajudar os profissionais a melhorar os tratamentos. Tem sido sugerido que a falta de controle da dor no período pós-operatório imediato vai gerar maior intensidade dessa dor durante os dias seguintes de estadia no hospital. OBJETIVO: Determinar o relacionamento entre a dor durante a primeira hora pós-operatória e as 24 horas após a mesma. MÉTODOS: Lugar da pesquisa: Hospital universitário geral. Desenho do estudo: Foi feito um estudo analítico prospectivo operacional com pacientes submetidos a procedimentos cirúrgicos sob anestesia geral e que foram hospitalizados pelo menos 24 horas antes. Cinco avaliações de dor foram feitas na primeira hora na sala de recuperação, seguidas de três avaliações durante as primeiras 24 horas. Os declives das trajetórias da dor foram calculados e seu relacionamento entre elas foi analisado. RESULTADOS: Duzentos e trinta e quatro pacientes foram recrutados, 31,3% apresentaram dor não controlada no ingresso à sala de recuperação; no final das primeiras 24 horas após a cirurgia, 5,5% dos pacientes apresentaram dor não controlada. O score da primeira intensidade de dor na sala de recuperação teve uma correlação negativa com o declive da primeira hora (P1): rS = −0,657 (p=0,000). De maneira similar, o score na primeira intensidade de dor teve uma associação negativa com o declive da trajetória da dor durante a permanência no hospital (P2): rS = −0,141 (p=0,032). Quando comparados os dois declives, não foi encontrada uma correlação significativa: rS = −0,126. CONCLUSÃO: A trajetória da dor durante a primeira hora não prediz o comportamento da trajetória durante o primeiro dia após a cirurgia.