RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Communication between patients and mental health professionals by means of messaging platforms in the interval between synchronous encounters became a kind of asynchronous teleconsultation (AT) whose usefulness and effect on providers' workload have not been explored. Method: Mental health providers working in Argentina were invited to answer a survey exploring the intensity and usefulness of AT, and the resulting overload. RESULTS: A total of 527 responses from professionals working throughout the country were received. As much as 69% of respondents exchanged messages with a mean of 1-10 patients/day and 31% with more than 10 patients/day; 75% answered messages over mobile phones on weekends. While 68% rated these interactions as positive for clinical follow-up, 47% considered them as a source of work overload. CONCLUSIONS: The generalized adoption of AT may require additional self-regulation by clinicians and regular monitoring of overload levels (particularly, among psychiatrists) to make their daily clinical practice efficient and sustainable.
OBJETIVOS: La comunicación entre pacientes y profesionales de la salud mental mediante plataformas de mensa- jería en el intervalo entre encuentros presenciales o virtuales se convirtió en una modalidad de teleconsulta asincrónica (TA) cuya utilidad y efecto en la carga de trabajo de los profesionales de salud mental no se han explorado. Método: Profesionales del campo de la salud mental que trabajan en Argentina fueron invitados a responder a una encuesta que exploraba la intensidad y utilidad de la TA, y la sobrecarga resultante. RESULTADOS: Se recibieron un total de 527 respuestas de profesionales que trabajan en todo el país. El 69 % de los encuestados mensajes con un promedio de 1-10 pacientes/día y el 31 % con más de 10 pacientes/día; el 75 % respondió mensajes por teléfono móvil los fines de semana. Mientras que el 68 % calificó estas interacciones como positivas para el seguimiento clínico, el 47 % las consideró una fuente de sobrecarga laboral. CONCLUSIONES: La adopción generalizada de la TA puede requerir una autorregulación adicional por parte de los profesionales y un seguimiento regular de los niveles de sobrecarga (especialmente, entre los psiquiatras) para que su práctica clínica diaria sea eficiente y sostenible.
Assuntos
Psiquiatria , Psicologia , Argentina , Humanos , Aplicativos Móveis , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , PsiquiatrasRESUMO
INTRODUCCIÓN: El empleo es uno de los componentes centrales de la recuperación en personas con trastornos mentales severos y un aspecto clave en la validación social. El objetivo del estudio fue conocer la experiencia laboral, el interés por trabajar, las conductas específicas de búsqueda laboral, el estatus ocupacional y las actitudes frente al trabajo en esta población. MÉTODOS: Un total de 103 personas en tratamiento en una institución de salud mental de la ciudad de Buenos Aires completaron un cuestionario censal en 2018 con preguntas abiertas y cerradas. El análisis fue mixto, con cálculo y comparación de frecuencias según grupos y análisis temático. RESULTADOS: La mayoría de los participantes tenía experiencia laboral, aunque solo el 29% estaba trabajando. El 93% de quienes no trabajaban dijo tener interés en hacerlo. Solo un 33% de quienes no tenían trabajo realizaban actividades para conseguirlo. Un 85% consideró que podría tener problemas en caso de trabajar y el 15% señaló que podría hacerle mal. No se observaron diferencias significativas según diagnóstico o género. DISCUSIÓN: El elevado interés por trabajar de las personas con trastornos mentales severos contrasta con un porcentaje considerable que, pese a ello, no busca trabajo y anticipa dificultades laborales. El estigma podría ser uno de los mayores obstáculos para la búsqueda y la inclusión laboral. Los programas de apoyo al empleo deben considerar algunos de los problemas hallados en este estudio.
Assuntos
Desemprego , Emprego , Recuperação da Saúde Mental , Transtornos MentaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Affective polarization and stigma toward individuals with schizophrenia and toward immigrants in Argentina are not new despite its importance and dissemination. However, no research has been conducted taking into consideration political partisanship and attitudes toward these groups. AIMS: Political polarization and attitudes toward socialization across party lines are studied in conjunction with attitudes toward immigrants and toward individuals with schizophrenia. METHOD: Individuals from Buenos Aires (n = 712) were surveyed for their political partisanship and their attitudes toward Peruvian and Bolivian immigrants, people with schizophrenia and partisans from the opposing political party. A modified version of the Bogardus scale was used. RESULTS: Social distance was from highest to lowest toward people with schizophrenia, political opponents, and immigrants. Individuals with schizophrenia were strongly discriminated against by most participants: 86% would definitely or probably not want them to take care of their children, 83% would not want them to be their healthcare provider, and 81% would not want to marry them. Immigrants were comparatively not discriminated against: 10% would not want them to take care of their children, 8% would not want to receive health care from them, and 28% would not want to marry them. Cristina Fernández de Kirchner partisans showed the lowest level of discrimination toward these two groups, compared to Mauricio Macri partisans and to independent voters. However, the former group had greater discriminatory attitudes toward Mauricio Macri partisans than the latter. CONCLUSIONS: As compared to other discriminatory attitudes, discrimination toward persons with schizophrenia is widespread and pervasive. Lower levels of discrimination toward people with schizophrenia and toward immigrants would not predict attitudes toward the opposing political partisans.
Assuntos
Esquizofrenia , Estigma Social , Argentina , Atitude , Criança , HumanosRESUMO
COVID-19 has accelerated the transformations of teleworking, generating conditions of great opportunities and terrible threats. The digital divide deepens inequities and exploitation, where the most unprotected countries and the most vulnerable populations are closer to the abyss Digital changes have formatted new modes of care, which are constantly changing and present new challenges to find their scope and limits.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Comunicação , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , TeletrabalhoRESUMO
Objective: To estimate the 12-month prevalence of mental health services utilization (overall and by type of service sector), the adequacy of treatment provided, and sociodemographic correlates in the Argentinean Study of Mental Health Epidemiology (ASMHE). Methods: The ASMHE is a multistage probability household sample representative of adults in urban areas of Argentina. The World Health Organization World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI) was used to evaluate psychiatric diagnosis and service utilization. Results: Among those with a disorder, 27.6% received any treatment in the prior 12 months. Of these, 78.3% received minimally adequate treatment using a broad definition and only 43.6% using a stringent definition. For individuals with a disorder, more services were provided by mental health professionals (17.7%) than by general medical professionals (11.5%) or non-healthcare sectors (2.6%). Younger individuals with low education and income were less likely to receive treatment; those never married and those with an anxiety or mood disorder were more likely to receive treatment. Among those in treatment, treatment was least adequate among younger individuals with low education and low income. Conclusions: Policies to increase access to services for mental health disorders in Argentina are needed, as is training for primary care practitioners in the early detection and treatment of psychiatric disorders.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Argentina/epidemiologia , Psiquiatria/educação , Fatores Socioeconômicos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Inquéritos e Questionários , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Clínicos Gerais/educação , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the 12-month prevalence of mental health services utilization (overall and by type of service sector), the adequacy of treatment provided, and sociodemographic correlates in the Argentinean Study of Mental Health Epidemiology (ASMHE). METHODS: The ASMHE is a multistage probability household sample representative of adults in urban areas of Argentina. The World Health Organization World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI) was used to evaluate psychiatric diagnosis and service utilization. RESULTS: Among those with a disorder, 27.6% received any treatment in the prior 12 months. Of these, 78.3% received minimally adequate treatment using a broad definition and only 43.6% using a stringent definition. For individuals with a disorder, more services were provided by mental health professionals (17.7%) than by general medical professionals (11.5%) or non-healthcare sectors (2.6%). Younger individuals with low education and income were less likely to receive treatment; those never married and those with an anxiety or mood disorder were more likely to receive treatment. Among those in treatment, treatment was least adequate among younger individuals with low education and low income. CONCLUSIONS: Policies to increase access to services for mental health disorders in Argentina are needed, as is training for primary care practitioners in the early detection and treatment of psychiatric disorders.
Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Argentina/epidemiologia , Feminino , Clínicos Gerais/educação , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Prevalência , Psiquiatria/educação , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
In this paper we report the findings of the first "Epidemiological study of mental health in the general population of Argentina" in the framework of the World Mental Health Survey Initiative WHO / Harvard, in collaboration with the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Buenos Aires and the Asociación de Psiquiatras Argentinos (APSA) with funding from the Ministry of Health. Methodology: A multistage probabilistic household survey was conducted using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). The survey was conducted on 3,927 people aged 18 and over (no age limit), with fixed residence in one of the eight largest urban areas in the country (Buenos Aires, Córdoba, Corrientes-Resistencia, Mendoza, Neuquén, Rosario, Salta and Tucumán), representing approximately 50.1% of the adults living in the country. The response rate was 77%. Results: The lifetime prevalence of any mental disorder in the general population of Argentina over 18 years of age was 29.1% and the projected life risk up to 75 years of age was 37.1%. The disorders with the highest life prevalence were Major Depressive Disorder (8.7%), Alcohol Abuse Disorder (8.1%) and Specific Phobia (6.8%). Anxiety Disorders were the most prevalent group (16.4%), followed by Mood Disorders (12.3%), Substance Disorders (10.4%), and Impulse Control Disorders (2.5%). The prevalence in the last 12 months of any mental disorder was 14.8%, a quarter of wich were classified as severe. 11.6% received treatment in the previous 12 months and only 30.2% of those who suffered a severe disorder received it. The results provide essential data for health planning and implementation and the training of the mental health workforce.