RESUMO

ABSTRACT Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the waiting list for kidney transplantation in our hospital according to candidate's panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) and its outcomes. Methods: One thousand six hundred forty patients who were on the waiting list between 2015 and 2019 were included. For the analysis, hazard ratios (HR) for transplant were estimated by Fine and Gray's regression model according to panel reactivity and HR for graft loss and death after transplantation. Results: The mean age was 45.39 ± 18.22 years. Male gender was predominant (61.2%), but the proportion decreased linearly with the increase in cPRA (p < 0.001). The distribution of patients according to panels were: 0% (n = 390), 1% - 49% (n = 517), 50% - 84% (n = 269), and ≥ 85% (n = 226). Transplantation was achieved in 85.5% of the sample within a median time of 8 months (CI 95%: 6.9 - 9.1). The estimated HRs for transplantation during the follow-up were 2.84 (95% CI: 2.51 - 3.34), 2.41(95%CI: 2.07 - 2.80), and 2.45(95%CI: 2.08 - 2.90) in the cPRA range of 0%, 1%-49%, and 50%-84%, respectively, compared to cPRA ≥ 85 (p < 0.001). After transplantation, the HR for graft loss was similar in the different cPRA groups, but the HR for death (0.46 95% CI 0.24-0.89 p = 0.022) was lower in the 0% cPRA group when adjusted for age, gender, and presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA). Conclusion: Patients with cPRA below 85% are more than twice as likely to receive a kidney transplantation with a shorter waiting time. The risk of graft loss after transplantation was similar in the different cPRA groups, and the adjusted risk of death was lower in nonsensitized recipients.

RESUMO Introdução: O objetivo foi analisar a lista de espera para transplante renal em nosso hospital segundo o painel de reatividade de anticorpos (PRAc) do candidato e seus desfechos. Métodos: Incluímos 1.640 pacientes em lista de espera entre 2015 e 2019. Para a análise, estimou-se a razão de risco (HR) para transplante pelo modelo de regressão de Fine e Gray conforme o painel de reatividade e HR para perda do enxerto e óbito após o transplante. Resultados: A idade média foi 45,39 ± 18,22 anos. Sexo masculino foi predominante (61,2%), mas a proporção diminuiu linearmente com o aumento do PRAc (p < 0,001). A distribuição de pacientes conforme os painéis foi: 0% (n = 390), 1% - 49% (n = 517), 50% - 84% (n = 269), e ≥85% (n = 226). O transplante foi realizado em 85,5% da amostra em tempo mediano de 8 meses (IC 95%: 6,9 - 9,1). As HRs estimadas para transplante durante o acompanhamento foram 2,84 (IC 95%: 2,51 - 3,34), 2,41 (IC 95%: 2,07 - 2,80) e 2,45 (IC 95%: 2,08 - 2,90) no intervalo de PRAc de 0%, 1%-49% e 50%-84%, respectivamente, comparadas com PRAc ≥ 85 (p < 0,001). Após o transplante, a HR para perda do enxerto foi semelhante nos diferentes grupos de PRAc, mas HR para óbito (0,46 IC 95% 0,24-0,89 p = 0,022) foi menor no grupo PRAc 0% quando ajustada para idade, sexo e presença de anticorpos doador específico (DSA). Conclusão: Pacientes com PRAc abaixo de 85% têm mais que o dobro de probabilidade de receber transplante renal com tempo de espera menor. Risco de perda do enxerto após o transplante foi semelhante nos diferentes grupos PRAc, e risco ajustado de óbito foi menor em receptores não sensibilizados.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze the waiting list for kidney transplantation in our hospital according to candidate's panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) and its outcomes. METHODS: One thousand six hundred forty patients who were on the waiting list between 2015 and 2019 were included. For the analysis, hazard ratios (HR) for transplant were estimated by Fine and Gray's regression model according to panel reactivity and HR for graft loss and death after transplantation. RESULTS: The mean age was 45.39 ± 18.22 years. Male gender was predominant (61.2%), but the proportion decreased linearly with the increase in cPRA (p < 0.001). The distribution of patients according to panels were: 0% (n = 390), 1% - 49% (n = 517), 50% - 84% (n = 269), and ≥ 85% (n = 226). Transplantation was achieved in 85.5% of the sample within a median time of 8 months (CI 95%: 6.9 - 9.1). The estimated HRs for transplantation during the follow-up were 2.84 (95% CI: 2.51 - 3.34), 2.41(95%CI: 2.07 - 2.80), and 2.45(95%CI: 2.08 - 2.90) in the cPRA range of 0%, 1%-49%, and 50%-84%, respectively, compared to cPRA ≥ 85 (p < 0.001). After transplantation, the HR for graft loss was similar in the different cPRA groups, but the HR for death (0.46 95% CI 0.24-0.89 p = 0.022) was lower in the 0% cPRA group when adjusted for age, gender, and presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA). CONCLUSION: Patients with cPRA below 85% are more than twice as likely to receive a kidney transplantation with a shorter waiting time. The risk of graft loss after transplantation was similar in the different cPRA groups, and the adjusted risk of death was lower in nonsensitized recipients.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The value of the crossmatch test in assessing pretransplant immunological risk is vital for clinical decisions, ranging from the indication of the transplant to the guidance of induction protocols and treatment with immunosuppressants. The crossmatch tests in transplantation can be physical or virtual, each with its advantages and limitations. Currently, the virtual crossmatch stands out for its sensitivity and specificity compared to the physical tests. Additionally, the virtual crossmatch can be performed in less time, allowing for a reduction in cold ischemia time. It shows a good correlation with the results of physical tests and does not negatively impact graft survival. Proper communication between clinicians and the transplant immunology laboratory will lead to a deeper understanding of each patient's immunological profile, better donor-recipient selection, and improved graft survival.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: The anti-human globulin-enhanced complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (AHG-CDCXM) assay has been used to assess the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in recipient's serum before kidney transplantation. The flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) assay was first introduced as an additional test. The aim of this study was to clinically validate the single use of the FCXM assay. Methods: This study compared the outcomes of a cohort of kidney transplant patients that underwent FCXM only (FCXM group) versus a cohort of kidney transplant patients that underwent AHG-CDCXM (control group). Results: Ninety-seven patients in the FCXM group and 98 controls were included. All crossmatches in the control group were negative. One patient in the FCXM group had a positive B cell crossmatch. One year after transplantation, there were no significant differences in patient survival (p = 0.591) and graft survival (p = 0.692) between the groups. Also, no significant difference was found in the incidence of Banff ≥ 1A acute cellular rejection episodes (p = 0.289). However, acute antibody-mediated rejections occurred in 3 controls (p = 0.028). Conclusion: The results showed that discontinuing the AHG-CDCXM assay does not modify the clinical outcomes in a 1-year follow-up.

Resumo Introdução: O ensaio de prova cruzada por citotoxicidade dependente do complemento antiglobulina humana (AHG-CDCXM - do inglês anti-human globulin-enhanced complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch) tem sido usado para avaliar a presença de anticorpos específicos contra o doador (DSA - do inglês donor-specific antibodies) no soro do receptor antes do transplante renal. O ensaio de prova cruzada por citometria de fluxo (CFXM) foi introduzido pela primeira vez como um teste adicional. O objetivo deste estudo foi validar clinicamente o uso único do ensaio CFXM. Métodos: Este estudo comparou os resultados de uma coorte de pacientes de transplante renal que foram submetidos apenas ao CFXM (grupo CFXM) contra uma coorte de pacientes de transplante renal submetidos ao AHG-CDCXM (grupo controle). Resultados: Foram incluídos noventa e sete pacientes no grupo CFXM e 98 controles. Todas as provas cruzadas no grupo controle foram negativas. Um paciente no grupo CFXM teve uma prova cruzada positiva para células B. Um ano após o transplante, não houve diferenças significativas na sobrevida do paciente (p = 0,591) e na sobrevida do enxerto (p = 0,692) entre os grupos. Também não foi encontrada diferença significativa na incidência de episódios de rejeição aguda celular (p = 0,289) segundo critério de Banff ≥ 1A. No entanto, rejeições agudas mediadas por anticorpos ocorreram em 3 controles (p = 0,028). Conclusão: Os resultados mostraram que a interrupção do ensaio AHG-CDCXM não modifica os desfechos clínicos em um acompanhamento de 1 ano.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The anti-human globulin-enhanced complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (AHG-CDCXM) assay has been used to assess the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in recipient's serum before kidney transplantation. The flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) assay was first introduced as an additional test. The aim of this study was to clinically validate the single use of the FCXM assay. METHODS: This study compared the outcomes of a cohort of kidney transplant patients that underwent FCXM only (FCXM group) versus a cohort of kidney transplant patients that underwent AHG-CDCXM (control group). RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients in the FCXM group and 98 controls were included. All crossmatches in the control group were negative. One patient in the FCXM group had a positive B cell crossmatch. One year after transplantation, there were no significant differences in patient survival (p = 0.591) and graft survival (p = 0.692) between the groups. Also, no significant difference was found in the incidence of Banff ≥ 1A acute cellular rejection episodes (p = 0.289). However, acute antibody-mediated rejections occurred in 3 controls (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: The results showed that discontinuing the AHG-CDCXM assay does not modify the clinical outcomes in a 1-year follow-up.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objective: To evaluate the difference between chromosomal abnormalities between the gender of couples affected by Recurrent miscarriage (RM) and if there is an association between previous obstetric history and chromosomal abnormalities of the parents.Methods: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study from seven different RM clinics between 2006 and 2016. We enrolled 707 couples (1014 participants) with a history of RM. We compared the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities between groups of couples with primary and secondary RM and separated between women and their partners. Furthermore, we compared the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities between groups based on the number of previous spontaneous abortions.Results: The overall prevalence of all cytogenetic abnormalities was 5.59% (n = 1414, women and their partners). Excluding cases of polymorphism and inversion of chromosome 9, which are considered variants of normality, the prevalence in all individuals was 2.26% (n = 32/1414). The comparative analysis of cases of chromosomal abnormalities among couples with primary and secondary RM based on the number of previous miscarriages (PM) revealed a similar frequency between groups. The statistical analysis of the total cases (primary PM + secondary PM) in these three groups were as follows: (a) couple, 2 pm versus 3 pm vs. ≥4 PM, p = .514; (b) women, 2 pm versus 3 pm vs. ≥4 PM, p = .347; and (3) partner, 2 pm versus 3 pm vs. ≥4 PM, p = .959. Chromosomal abnormalities were significantly more prevalent among women than among their partners (6.9 versus 4.2%; p = .027). Moreover, the distribution of leading chromosomal abnormalities among women was different compared with their partners. Among women, we observed these abnormalities in the following frequency order: mosaicism (38.8%), polymorphism (32.6%), translocation (16.3%), and inversion (12.3%). Among their partners, these abnormalities were polymorphism (73.3%), inversion (13.3%), mosaicism (6.7%), and translocation (6.7%).Conclusion: The number of PM and the history of full-term pregnancy does not correlate with an increase or decrease in the prevalence of cytogenetic abnormalities in couples with RM.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to elucidate which types of recurrent miscarriage (RM) patients experienced a livebirth after paternal lymphocyte immunotherapy (LIT) and to evaluate the perinatal outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a multicenter, observational study which enrolled 1096 couples with a history of two or more spontaneous miscarriages without any intercalated delivery. We conducted an intention-to-treat analysis of couples with RM treated with or without LIT regarding to gestational and perinatal outcomes. We compared groups by using the Student's t-test or Kruskal-Wallis test, Fisher's exact-test and χ 2 test when appropriate. RESULTS: The success of gestation was significantly higher in the LIT group (60.1% vs. 33.1%; p < 0.001). A sub-analysis of four different immune disorder groups revealed a significantly higher success in the LIT group in all immune categories, except in patients who had autoantibodies positive. We observed no significant differences in perinatal outcomes such as gestational age at birth, preterm and extreme preterm birth, and birth weight in successful pregnancy in both groups. The success rate was significantly higher when LIT was administrated before and during pregnancy and only during pregnancy compared to only before pregnancy (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Careful laboratory test phenotyping of RM patients may identify subgroups most likely to benefit and exclude those with little likelihood of benefit, and LIT during a pregnancy may significantly improve success rates.

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Introduction: Currently, there is no specific immunosuppressive protocol for hepatitis C (HCV)-positive renal transplants recipients. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the conversion effect to everolimus (EVR) on HCV in adult kidney recipients. Method: This is an exploratory single-center, prospective, randomized, open label controlled trial with renal allograft recipients with HCV-positive serology. Participants were randomized for conversion to EVR or maintenance of calcineurin inhibitors. Results: Thirty patients were randomized and 28 were followed-up for 12 months (conversion group, Group 1 =15 and control group, Group 2 =13). RT-PCR HCV levels reported in log values were comparable in both groups and among patients in the same group. The statistical analysis showed no interaction effect between time and group (p value G*M= 0.852), overtime intra-groups (p-value M=0.889) and between group (p-value G=0.286). Group 1 showed a higher incidence of dyslipidemia (p=0.03) and proteinuria events (p=0.01), while no difference was observed in the incidence of anemia (p=0.17), new onset of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (p=1.00) or urinary tract infection (p=0.60). The mean eGFR was similar in both groups. Conclusion: Our study did not show viral load decrease after conversion to EVR with maintenance of antiproliferative therapy.

RESUMO Introdução: Atualmente não há um protocolo imunossupressor específico para os receptores de transplantes renais portadores de hepatite C (HCV). Assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o efeito da conversão a Everolimo (EVR) na HCV em receptores adultos de transplantes renais. Método: Trata-se de um estudo unicêntrico, prospectivo, randomizado, exploratório, controlado, aberto em receptores de aloenxertos renais com sorologia positiva para HCV. Os participantes foram randomizados para conversão a EVR ou manutenção dos inibidores da calcineurina. Resultados: Trinta pacientes foram randomizados e 28 foram acompanhados por um período de 12 meses (grupo de conversão, Grupo 1 = 15 e grupo controle, Grupo 2 =13). Níveis de RT-PCR HCV descritos em valores logarítmicos foram comparáveis entre os grupos e entre pacientes em um mesmo grupo. A análise estatística não mostrou efeitos de interação entre tempo e grupo (valor p G*M= 0,852), ao longo do tempo em cada grupo (valor p M=0,889) e entre grupos (valor p G=0,286). O Grupo 1 apresentou uma maior incidência de eventos de dislipidemia (p=0,03) e proteinúria (p=0,01); não houve diferença na incidência de anemia (p=0,17), diabetes mellitus de início pós-transplante (p=1,00) ou infecção do trato urinário (p=0,60). A TFGe média foi semelhante nos dois grupos. Conclusão: Nosso estudo não mostrou redução da carga viral após conversão a EVR com manutenção do tratamento antiproliferativo.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Currently, there is no specific immunosuppressive protocol for hepatitis C (HCV)-positive renal transplants recipients. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the conversion effect to everolimus (EVR) on HCV in adult kidney recipients. METHOD: This is an exploratory single-center, prospective, randomized, open label controlled trial with renal allograft recipients with HCV-positive serology. Participants were randomized for conversion to EVR or maintenance of calcineurin inhibitors. RESULTS: Thirty patients were randomized and 28 were followed-up for 12 months (conversion group, Group 1 =15 and control group, Group 2 =13). RT-PCR HCV levels reported in log values were comparable in both groups and among patients in the same group. The statistical analysis showed no interaction effect between time and group (p value G*M= 0.852), overtime intra-groups (p-value M=0.889) and between group (p-value G=0.286). Group 1 showed a higher incidence of dyslipidemia (p=0.03) and proteinuria events (p=0.01), while no difference was observed in the incidence of anemia (p=0.17), new onset of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (p=1.00) or urinary tract infection (p=0.60). The mean eGFR was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Our study did not show viral load decrease after conversion to EVR with maintenance of antiproliferative therapy.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PROBLEM: To evaluate the predictors of successful pregnancies in women with a history of recurrent miscarriages (RMs) having undergone lymphocyte immunotherapy (LIT). METHOD OF STUDY: Retrospective, multicenter, observational study which involved 702 pregnant women with history of RM treated with LIT. Comparative analysis of women with a history of RM having undergone LIT and experienced treatment success vs those having experienced treatment failure along with the analysis of the association between the number of prior miscarriages and the efficacy of LIT. RESULTS: A total of 421 women were able to carry the pregnancy to term, with treatment success rate of 60%. The multivariate analysis showed that age, the association between autoantibodies and thrombophilia, and the number of previous miscarriages were factors associated with LIT failure. Secondary RMs alone were not found to be a factor predictive of LIT success or failure; however, secondary RMs among women with a history of 5 or more RM were found to be a predictor of LIT success (OR: 10.24; 95% CI: 1.9-55.8; P = .007). CONCLUSION: Age, the number of previous miscarriages, and the association between autoantibodies and thrombophilia are associated with LIT failure. A higher number of previous miscarriages in cases of secondary RM resulted in better LIT outcomes.

Assuntos