RESUMO
Chronic venous insufficiency ranges from mild telangiectasias to skin ulceration with poor prognosis regarding healing and quality of life. Varicose veins are the most frequent clinical presentation, affecting 75% of such patients and 71% are due to primary reflux of great saphenous vein, which is the most compromised vein in chronic venous insufficiency. However, about 75% of these veins are not dilated. The standard treatment has been stripping of the saphenous vein, because it has 85% of good results at long term. However, saphenous vein is the main arterial substitute and should be spared whenever possible. The development of non-invasive diagnostic methods showed that hemodynamic worsening correlates with clinical severity and that the majority of patients did not have a dilated saphenous vein. Thus, several selective operations proposed to spare the saphenous vein have reported good results. Minimally invasive techniques (eco-guided foam, radiofrequency and laser) have also emerged aiming to obliterate the vein and abolishing reflux and have also reported good results, but they do not spare the vessel. Measurement of saphenous diameter has been shown to correlate with clinical and hemodynamic worsening, thus allowing planning the invasive treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. Dilated diameters (>7.2 mm) correlate with severe disease and poor prognosis, being an indication for total abolishment of saphenous vein reflux. All other presentations must be individualized, sparing saphenous vein whenever possible and and a standardized approach is not indicated for all patients.
Assuntos
Veia Safena , Insuficiência Venosa/cirurgia , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Varizes/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Silicone gel dressings decrease scar volume and soften hypertrophic tissue, allowing it to be more easily controlled by other methods. Although silicone does not appear to be an essential component of the treatment, nonsilicone dressings have been reported to cause no change in physical parameters during a 2-month treatment period. OBJECTIVE: To compare silicone and nonsilicone gel dressings in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars, including a control group, and to evaluate the effectiveness of these treatments using two new assessment techniques. METHODS: Patients were randomly chosen to receive silicone or nonsilicone gel dressings in a 4.5-month controlled prospective study. Scar size, induration, and symptoms were evaluated before and after the treatment. Scar color was visually measured using a color palette catalog, and a new device was developed to measure intracicatricial pressure. RESULTS: All of the measured parameters were significantly reduced in both silicone- and nonsilicone-treated groups, as compared to the control, with no significant differences between them. CONCLUSION: Silicone and nonsilicone gel dressings are equally effective in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars.
Assuntos
Bandagens , Cicatriz/terapia , Géis de Silicone , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cicatriz/patologia , Cicatriz Hipertrófica/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Queloide/terapia , MasculinoRESUMO
The authors present a case report of hypoglycemic tumor (insulinoma) of the pancreas. The tumor had benign histology and the greatest volume among the tumors of this type described in the literature.