Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 18(10): 996-1002, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26742937

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of Ki67 as a prognostic marker in Luminal B node-negative breast cancer patients. METHODS: We identified 888 patients with invasive breast carcinomas who underwent surgery between 1997 and 2004. Several classical factors were collected: age, tumor size, node involvement, tumor grade, estrogen and progesterone receptors, HER2 and Ki-67 expression. We analyzed if these parameters could be considered as a prognostic factor. In early Luminal B group, we investigated which of the following biological features provide information about bad prognosis: lack of progesterone receptor expression, HER2 overexpression/amplification or high Ki-67 value. RESULTS: The majority of patients were alive and without relapse of tumor at the moment of the analysis (70 %). The prognostic factors founded in multivariate analysis were: tumor size, node involvement, grade 3 and Ki-67 expression. When we stratified the sample by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tumor subtypes, we assessed 680 patients and we observed 191 Luminal B tumors. The biological parameter related to the worst survival in absence of nodal involvement was Ki-67 value. CONCLUSIONS: Ki-67 represents an additional predictor of survival in Luminal B node negative breast cancer. Conversely, neither Progesterone-receptor nor HER2 status proved prognostic significance in this group in our study.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Antígeno Ki-67/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Lobular/metabolismo , Carcinoma Lobular/patologia , Carcinoma Medular/metabolismo , Carcinoma Medular/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Taxa de Sobrevida
2.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 15(12): 1030-6, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24019035

RESUMO

Chemotherapy-induced emesis (CIE) both in the form of nausea and vomiting is one of the adverse effects most feared by patients who receive treatment, and one of the factors that most affect their quality of life and limit their functional capacity for everyday activities. Chemotherapy-induced emesis can result from many factors, depending on the treatment and the patients themselves. The best treatment for CIE is prevention, based on the use of drugs aimed at inhibiting the signal of certain neurotransmitters involved in the process. Antiemetic prophylaxis for chemotherapy of high-emetogenous potential lasting 1 day includes a combination of anti-5-HT3, neurokinin-1 inhibitors and dexamethasone. Antiemetic prophylaxis for chemotherapy of moderate-emetogenous potential lasting 1 day includes a combination of palonosetron and dexamethasone. Prophylaxis is not recommended for chemotherapy with minimal emetogenous potential. In the case of unforeseen or refractory emesis the use of olanzapine, metoclopramide or phenothiazine should be considered.


Assuntos
Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimioprevenção/normas , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Vômito/induzido quimicamente , Vômito/prevenção & controle , Esquema de Medicação , Humanos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA