RESUMO

BACKGROUND: High body mass index, as well as maintaining this condition for a long period of time, are important risk factors for the development of osteoarthritis. AIM: To determine joint pain and osteoarthritis prevalence in patients referred to bariatric surgery. METHODS: Morbidly obese patients referred to bariatric surgery responded to the visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and the WOMAC questionnaire. X-rays of the hips and knees were evaluated. The primary endpoints were self-reported joint pain and the diagnosis of osteoarthritis by clinical and radiological criteria of the American College of Rheumatology. RESULTS: 141 patients were interviewed (85.1% women) with a mean age of 40 years. The mean body mass index was 46. The lumbar spine and knee joint were the most commonly reported as painful (77.9% and 73.2% respectively). Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis was 63.1% and hip osteoarthritis was 40.8%. Age, mean VAS and WOMAC scores were higher in the osteoarthritic individuals. CONCLUSION: There is prevalence of 90.1% of pain symptoms in morbidly obese patients referred to bariatric surgery. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis was 63.1% and hip osteoarthritis was 40.8% in this sample.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Background: High body mass index, as well as maintaining this condition for a long period of time, are important risk factors for the development of osteoarthritis. Aim: To determine joint pain and osteoarthritis prevalence in patients referred to bariatric surgery. Methods: Morbidly obese patients referred to bariatric surgery responded to the visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and the WOMAC questionnaire. X-rays of the hips and knees were evaluated. The primary endpoints were self-reported joint pain and the diagnosis of osteoarthritis by clinical and radiological criteria of the American College of Rheumatology. Results: 141 patients were interviewed (85.1% women) with a mean age of 40 years. The mean body mass index was 46. The lumbar spine and knee joint were the most commonly reported as painful (77.9% and 73.2% respectively). Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis was 63.1% and hip osteoarthritis was 40.8%. Age, mean VAS and WOMAC scores were higher in the osteoarthritic individuals. Conclusion: There is prevalence of 90.1% of pain symptoms in morbidly obese patients referred to bariatric surgery. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis was 63.1% and hip osteoarthritis was 40.8% in this sample.

RESUMO Racional: Alto índice de massa corpórea, assim como a manutenção desta condição por longo período de tempo, são importantes fatores de risco para o desenvolvimento de osteoartrite. Objetivo: Determinar a prevalência de dor articular e osteoartrite em pacientes aguardando cirurgia bariátrica. Métodos: Pacientes obesos mórbidos responderam à escala e questionário (VAS e WOMAC) de dor e função. Radiografias dos quadris e joelhos foram avaliadas. Os desfechos primários foram dor articular referida nos questionários e o diagnóstico de osteoartrite feito através dos critérios clinicoradiológicos do Colégio Americano de Reumatologia. Resultados: Cento e quarenta e um pacientes foram entrevistados (85,1% mulheres) com idade média de 40 anos. A média do índice de massa corpórea foi de 46. Coluna lombar e joelhos foram as regiões mais comumente referidas com dor (77,9% e 73,2% respectivamente). A prevalência de osteoartrite dos joelhos foi de 63,1% e dos quadris foi de 40,8%. Idade, média da escala visual de dor e resultados do questionário de WOMAC foram maiores nos indivíduos com osteoartrite. Conclusão: Há prevalência de 90,1% de sintomas dolorosos nos pacientes obesos mórbidos encaminhados para cirurgia bariátrica. A osteoartrite dos joelhos foi de 63,1% e de quadris de 40,8%.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: Avaliar a reprodutibilidade intra e inter observadores da Classificação Tomográfica de Sanders das fraturas do calcâneo entre observadores mais e menos experientes em cirurgia do pé e tornozelo.Métodos: Foram avaliadas imagens tomográficas de 46 pacientes com diagnóstico de fratura do calcâneo. Quatro observadores, dois com dez anos de experiência em cirurgia do pé e tornozelo e dois residentes do terceiro ano em Ortopedia e Traumatologia classificaram as fraturas independentemente. Após três semanas, os mesmos observadores classificaram as fraturas apresentadas em ordem alterada aleatoriamente.A concordância intra e inter observadores foi analisada através do índice Kappa. Resultados: Houve boa concordância intra observador para os dois observadores mais experientes e um observador menos experiente (valores de Kappa 0,640; 0,632 e 0,629, respectivamente). Quando analisada a concordância inter observador, houve concordância fraca entre os mais experientes (Kappa = 0,289) e moderada entreos menos experientes (Kappa = 0,527). Conclusões: A Classificação Tomográfica de Sanders apresentou boa concordância intra observador,porém reprodutibilidade inter observadores abaixo da ideal, tanto entre observadores mais experientes quanto aqueles menos experientes.Nível de Evidência III, Estudos Diagnósticos.

Objective: To assess intra- and interobserver reproducibilityof Sanders Classification System of calcaneal fracturesamong experienced and less experienced observers. Methods:Forty-six CT scans of intra-articular calcaneal fractureswere reviewed. Four observers, two with ten years ofexperience in foot and ankle surgery and two third-year residentsin Orthopedics and Traumatology classified the fractureson two separate occasions three weeks apart from eachother. The intra and inter-observer reliability was analyzedusing the Kappa index. Results: There was good intraobserverreliability for the two experienced observers and oneless experienced observer (Kappa values 0.640, 0.632 and0.629, respectively). The interobserver reliability was fairbetween the experienced observers (Kappa = 0.289) andmoderate among the less experienced observers (Kappa= 0.527). Conclusions: The Sanders Classification Systemshowed good intraobserver reliability, but interobserver reproducibilitybelow the ideal level, both among experiencedand less experienced observers. Level of Evidence III,Diagnostic Studies.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: : To assess intra- and interobserver reproducibility of Sanders Classification System of calcaneal fractures among experienced and less experienced observers. METHODS: : Forty-six CT scans of intra-articular calcaneal fractures were reviewed. Four observers, two with ten years of experience in foot and ankle surgery and two third-year residents in Orthopedics and Traumatology classified the fractures on two separate occasions three weeks apart from each other. The intra and inter-observer reliability was analyzed using the Kappa index. RESULTS: : There was good intraobserver reliability for the two experienced observers and one less experienced observer (Kappa values 0.640, 0.632 and 0.629, respectively). The interobserver reliability was fair between the experienced observers (Kappa = 0.289) and moderate among the less experienced observers (Kappa = 0.527). CONCLUSIONS: : The Sanders Classification System showed good intraobserver reliability, but interobserver reproducibility below the ideal level, both among experienced and less experienced observers. Level of Evidence III, Diagnostic Studies.