RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Previous research has suggested an association between plagiocephaly and developmental delay. However, study samples drawn from children seen in subspecialty clinics increase the potential for selection and referral bias. Our study evaluates the association between plagiocephaly and developmental delay and the timing of these diagnoses in a primary care setting, where plagiocephaly is commonly diagnosed and managed. METHODS: Our retrospective analysis used electronic medical record data from 45 primary care sites within a children's health system from 1999 to 2017, including children aged 0 to 5 years with diagnoses determined by physician diagnosis codes at primary care visits. Children were classified in the plagiocephaly group if diagnosis occurred by 12 months of age. Primary outcome was any developmental delay. Pearson χ2 test, Fisher exact test, and logistic regression analyses were conducted, with multivariable models adjusted for sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, prematurity status (22-36 weeks' gestation), primary care sites, birth year, and diagnoses of abnormal tone and torticollis. RESULTS: Of 77,108 patients seen by 12 months, 2315 (3.0%) were diagnosed with plagiocephaly, with an increase in diagnosis prevalence over the study time frame. Plagiocephaly was independently associated with an increased odds of any developmental delay diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.32-1.70). The diagnosis of plagiocephaly was recorded before the diagnosis of developmental delay in most cases when both diagnoses were present (374 of 404, 92.6%). CONCLUSION: Data from a large primary care cohort demonstrate an association between plagiocephaly and developmental delay, affirming findings in previous subspecialty literature.
Assuntos
Plagiocefalia não Sinostótica , Plagiocefalia , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Lactente , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
A sunken soft-spot or fontanel is a sign for dehydration in infants. Around the world, folk illnesses, such as caída de la mollera in some Latin American cultures, often incorporate this sign as a hallmark of illness, but may or may not incorporate re-hydration therapies in treatment strategies. This report describes a study of lay descriptions of causes, symptoms, and treatments for caída de la mollera in three diverse Latin American populations. A mixed-methods approach was used. Representative community-based samples were interviewed in rural Guatemala, Guadalajara, Mexico, and Edinburgh, Texas, with a 132 item questionnaire on the causes, susceptibility, symptoms, and therapies for caída de la mollera. Cultural consensus analysis was used to estimate community beliefs about caída. Interviews conducted in rural Guatemala (n = 60), urban Mexico (n = 62), and rural Texas on the Mexican border (n = 61) indicated consistency in thematic elements within and among these three diverse communities. The high degree of consistency in the illness explanatory models indicated shared beliefs about caída de la mollera in each of the communities and a core model shared across communities. However, an important aspect of the community beliefs was that rehydration therapies were not widely endorsed. The consistency in explanatory models in such diverse communities, as well as the high degree of recognition and experience with this illness, may facilitate communication between community members, and health care providers/public health intervention planners to increase use of rehydration therapies for caída de la mollera. Recommendations for culturally informed and respectful approaches to clinical communication are provided.
Assuntos
Desidratação/etnologia , Desidratação/terapia , Hidratação/métodos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Adulto , Desidratação/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Guatemala/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Medicina Tradicional , México/epidemiologia , População Rural , Texas/epidemiologia , População UrbanaRESUMO
This study reports on community surveys of 160 representative Latino adults in Hartford, CT, Edinburg, TX, Guadalajara, Mexico; and in rural Guatemala. A 142-item questionnaire covered asthma beliefs and practices (e.g., causes, symptoms, and treatments). The cultural consensus model was used to analyze the agreement among respondents within each sample and to describe beliefs. Beliefs were then compared across the four samples. Analysis of the questionnaire data shows that there was overall consistency or consensus regarding beliefs and practices among individuals at each site (intraculturally) and to a lesser extent across respondents of all four different Latino cultural groups (i.e., interculturally). This pattern of response is indicative of a shared belief system among the four groups with regard to asthma. Within this shared belief system though, there is systematic variation between groups in causes, symptoms, and treatments for asthma. The most widely recognized and shared beliefs concerned causes of asthma. Notable differences were present between samples in terms of differences in beliefs about symptoms and treatments. The biomedical model is shown to be a part of the explanatory model at all sites; in addition to the biomedical model, ethnocultural beliefs such as the humoral ("hot/cold") aspects and the importance of balance are also evident. The Connecticut Puerto Ricans had a greater degree of shared beliefs about asthma than did the other three samples (p < 0.00005). It was concluded that the four Latino groups studied share an overall belief system regarding asthma, including many aspects of the biomedical model of asthma. In addition, traditional Latino ethnomedical beliefs are present, especially concerning the importance of balance in health and illness. Many beliefs and practices are site-specific, and caution should be used when using inclusive terms such as "Hispanic" or "Latino," since there is variation as well as commonality among different ethnic groups with regard to health beliefs and practices.