RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 outbreak brought an unprecedented challenge to the world. Knowledge in the field has been increasing exponentially and the main allergy societies have produced guidance documents for better management of allergic patients during this period. However, few publications so far have provided real-life data from the allergy community concerning allergy practice during the COVID-19 outbreak. Therefore, we proposed an international survey on the management of allergic patients during the current pandemic. METHODS: We performed an online survey undertaken to reach out the worldwide allergy community by e-mail and social media. The web-based questionnaire contained 24 questions covering demographic data from the participants, clinical practice during this period, and questions related to the new international classification and coding tools addressed for COVID-19. It was circulated for 8 weeks and had anonymous and volunteer context. RESULTS: Data are presented for 635 participants from 78 countries of all continents. Allergists with long-term professional experience were the main audience. As expected, we received many responses as "I have no data" or "I don't know" to the questions of the survey. However, most with more experience on managing allergic patients during the pandemic agreed that patients suffering from allergic or hypersensitivity conditions have no increased risk of contracting COVID-19 or developing SARS CoV-2. Also, participants mentioned that none of the allergy treatments (inhaled corticosteroids, allergen immunotherapy, biological agents) increased the risk of contracting COVID-19 infection including severe presentations. CONCLUSION: The data presented are a starting point in the process of getting feedback on all the recommendations provided by the allergy societies; it could also be the basis of new strategies to support health professionals while new COVID-19 specific treatments and vaccines are being explored. The information here presented intends to be helpful to the community but represents a course of action in a highly specific situation due to the state of emergency, and it should be helpful to health systems.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: One main practice gap in allergology that has been detected in several regions of the world is the application of specific immunotherapy (SIT). The prescription and practice of SIT should characterize allergologic specialists, but there are regional discrepancies in such practice. A detailed knowledge of the regulatory and legislation aspects and drawbacks would help improve and harmonize SIT practice. OBJECTIVE: To describe in Latin America the level of allergy training and the characteristics of the use of SIT, including the medical and legal aspects. METHODS: Three sources were used: a 24-item questionnaire sent to 22 allergologic leaders in 11 Latin American countries, 2 face-to-face meetings, and information from health authorities involved in the approval of medical substances. RESULTS: In 56% of countries, the specialty of allergology is a third-level care specialty and/or a subspecialty. Two countries have a special training program for pediatric allergists. Passing a board examination is mandatory in 3 countries, and recertification every 2 to 5 years occurs without examination. Sublingual and subcutaneous SITs are available in all Latin American countries. No legislation restricts SIT prescription and it can be performed by nonspecialists in 7 of 11 countries. In 90% of countries, allergists use allergen extracts from the United States (subcutaneous immunotherapy) and Europe (sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapies), and 50% also manufacture extracts locally. Only 1 country has legal requirements for the quality of raw materials. CONCLUSION: The present analysis helps to identify gaps in the field of allergologic training and SIT in Latin America, many of them amendable.
Assuntos
Alergia e Imunologia/educação , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Hipersensibilidade/terapia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia , América Latina , Legislação Médica , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Allergic rhinitis and asthma represent global problems of public health affecting all age groups; asthma and allergic rhinitis frequently coexist in the same patients. In Latin American prevalence of allergic rhinitis, although variable, is very high. Allergic rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) started during a workshop of the World Health Organization performed in 1999 and was published in 2001. ARIA proposed a new classification of allergic rhinitis in intermittent or persistent and mild or moderate-severe. This approach of classification reflects more nearly the impact of allergic rhinitis in patients. In its review of 2010 ARIA developed guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of allergic rhinitis and of clinical practices for management of comorbidities of allergic rhinitis and asthma based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Development and Evaluation). ARIA has been spread and implemented in more than 50 countries. In Latin American an intense activity has been developed to spread these recommendations in almost all the countries of the region and it is important to record the obtained goals in the diffusion and implementation of ARIA, as well as to identify the unsatisfied needs from the clinical, research and implementation points of view. Final objective is to reinforce the priority that allergy and asthma should have, especially in children, in the programs of public health, as they have been prioritized in European Union in 2011.
La rinitis alérgica y el asma representan problemas globales de salud pública que afectan a todos los grupos etarios; el asma y la rinitis alérgica frecuentemente coexisten en los mismos pacientes. En América Latina la prevalencia de rinitis alérgica, aunque variable, es muy elevada. La iniciativa Rinitis Alérgica y su Impacto en Asma (globalmente conocida como ARIA, de su nombre en inglés Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma) comenzó durante un taller de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) realizado en 1999 que se publicó en el año 2001. ARIA propuso una nueva clasificación de rinitis alérgica en intermitente o persistente y leve o moderada-severa. Este esquema de clasificación refleja más estrechamente el impacto de la rinitis alérgica en los pacientes. En su revisión de 2010, la guía ARIA desarrolló pautas para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la rinitis alérgica y de prácticas clínicas para el manejo de las comorbilidades de la rinitis alérgica y el asma basadas en GRADE (Gradación de Recomendaciones, Desarrollo y Evaluación). ARIA se ha diseminado e implantado en más de 50 países. En América Latina se ha desarrollado una intensa actividad para diseminar estas recomendaciones en casi todos los países de la región y es importante llevar un registro de los logros obtenidos en la difusión e implantación de ARIA, además de identificar las necesidades insatisfechas desde el punto de vista clínico, de la investigación y de la implantación. El objetivo final es reforzar la prioridad que deben tener la alergia y el asma especialmente en niños en los programas de Salud Pública, tal como los priorizó la Unión Europea en 2011.
Assuntos
Alergia e Imunologia/organização & administração , Asma/epidemiologia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Rinite Alérgica Perene/epidemiologia , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Alergia e Imunologia/tendências , Asma/classificação , Asma/prevenção & controle , Asma/terapia , Congressos como Assunto , Prova Pericial , Previsões , Governo , Política de Saúde , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiologia , Fenótipo , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Setor Privado , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Rinite Alérgica , Rinite Alérgica Perene/classificação , Rinite Alérgica Perene/prevenção & controle , Rinite Alérgica Perene/terapia , Sociedades Médicas/tendências , Organização Mundial da SaúdeRESUMO
In Latin America, allergic diseases have a very high prevalence, comparable to that of many other countries of the world, and that prevalence is constantly increasing. Within the region, the number of allergy specialists is quite high, although allergy is not recognized as a full specialty in all countries. Specific immunotherapy is the only available allergen-oriented immunomodulator, capable of improving symptoms and modifying the natural course of the disease, and therefore it represents a powerful therapeutic tool for specialists. During the last 20 years, the practice of immunotherapy in Latin America has much improved, especially because of the intensive educational effort, the widespread divulgation of the international guidelines and the adoption of the paradigm of the evidence-based medicine. In this regard, indications, contraindications, and limits of immunotherapy, are currently well acknowledged. In Latin America, immunotherapy is properly prescribed for inhalant allergens and hymenoptera venom by allergy specialists, although some non-evidence based forms of immunotherapy (e.g. bacterial extracts, treatment of atopic dermatitis) are still occasionally practiced. Sublingual immunotherapy is now accepted as a viable alternative to the traditional subcutaneous administration, and it begins to be proposed and studied also in some Latin American countries. Some debate remains on the use of immunotherapy for one or few versus multiple allergens, and also the availability of standardized extracts is not uniform. Finally, this therapeutic modality is not always given for free to low income patients such is the case in some countries and the different modalities of reimbursement among countries often represent a limit to the use of this treatment. Much has been done in improving the use of immunotherapy in Latin America. The main challenges and objectives for the near future are greater diffusion of the evidence-based medicine, a better standardization of extracts and procedures, and the achievement of the availability of immunotherapy for a greater number of subjects.
Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade/terapia , Imunoterapia/tendências , Previsões , Humanos , Imunoterapia/métodos , América LatinaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Allergic rhinitis and asthma are some of the most prevalent chronic diseases in children. Meticulous evaluations of the therapeutic options and interventions are needed to control this burden. The central pathogenic mechanism is an immediate hypersensitivity reaction, followed by interventions in the allergic cascade. Once inflammation is established, potent anti-inflammatory agents or mediator antagonists could help control the phenomenon and reduce the characteristic symptoms related to severity. RECENT FINDINGS: Monoclonal antibody against IgE has demonstrated its efficacy in reducing the symptoms of asthma and rhinitis. In difficult-to-treat asthma patients it allows a reduction in the dose of inhaled steroids, the number of exacerbations, emergency visits and hospitalizations. Its broad implementation is limited by its high cost because adverse events are not a concern. Specific sublingual immunotherapy gave promising results in clinical trials, while modifying immunoglobulins and cytokine profiles, also inducing T-cell tolerance. Safety issues of subcutaneous immunotherapy have been surpassed by the sublingual route, with equivalent efficacy. The new inhaled steroid ciclesonide is effective in established inflammation, is activated only in the respiratory system, and has negligible systemic effects. SUMMARY: Robust evidence on the efficacy and safety of several novel therapies in rhinitis and asthma is available.
Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Rinite Alérgica Perene/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Asma/imunologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Imunoterapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rinite Alérgica Perene/imunologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The asthma managing strategy has evolved and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are now the cornerstone of asthma treatment. Their effect on symptoms and exacerbations are well ascertained, whereas their effects on asthma mortality are still matter of debate. This ecological study evaluated asthma mortality rates and drug sales in the decade 1990-1999 in Argentina. METHODS: Mortality (overall and adjusted for 5-34 years) was obtained from the Argentinean Epidemiological Institute, and data on the sales of antiasthma drugs were provided by the International Marketing Survey. RESULTS: There was a significant change in drug sales in the spanned period: ICS +479%, inhaled beta2 agonists +32%, theophylline -63%. The crude and adjusted mortality rates were 3.38 and 0.72 in the 1980-1989 decade, and 2.58 (P<0.05) and 0.38 (P<0.01) in the subsequent one. There was inverse correlation between inhaled corticosteroid sale and age-adjusted (5-34) asthma mortality (r=-0.84; P=0.003), and the same with global mortality rates (r=-0.81; P=0.005). A positive correlation was also seen between theophylline sales and mortality. CONCLUSION: The increased sale of ICS and possibly the decrease of theophylline use seem to be the more relevant factors associated with decreased asthma mortality in Argentina.
Assuntos
Corticosteroides/economia , Antiasmáticos/economia , Asma/mortalidade , Administração por Inalação , Adolescente , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Argentina/epidemiologia , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/economia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , HumanosRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is widely used in several European countries. Many clinical trials and a meta-analysis presently support its efficacy, but limits and indications in pediatric age still need to be clarified. We review here the most recent literature on SLIT, with particular attention paid to the safety of children and to the additional clinical effects. RECENT FINDINGS: In addition to clinical trials, post-marketing surveillance studies have confirmed the optimal safety profile of SLIT in adults and children, including those below the age of 5 years. The most recent studies have shown that SLIT, identically to the subcutaneous route, has the potential to affect the immunological response to allergens. This is testified to by the facts that SLIT can prevent the onset of new sensitizations and maintain its beneficial effect for years after discontinuation. Moreover, it has been shown that SLIT can prevent the onset of asthma in children with rhinitis. SUMMARY: Due to its excellent safety, SLIT would be an optimal candidate for use in pediatric age groups, where the natural history of allergy can be to some extent modified. Nonetheless, formal and rigorous studies are needed to define its exact indication and dosage.
Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade/tratamento farmacológico , Imunoterapia/métodos , Administração Sublingual , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Allergen-specific immunotherapy, together with drug therapy and allergen avoidance, is a cornerstone in the management of respiratory allergy in both adults and children. Since the introduction of sublingual administration of immunotherapy (SLIT), it was regarded as the most promising approach, especially because of its optimal safety profile. After 15 years of clinical trials, the WHO officially accepted SLIT as a routine clinical option in both adults and children. This paper reviews the up-to-date aspects about clinical efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of sublingual immunotherapy.