RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: A complex relationship between donor and recipient characteristics influences kidney transplant (KT) success. A tool developed by Bae S. et al. (Survival Benefit Estimator, SBE) helps estimate post-KT survival. We aim to evaluate the predictive performance of the SBE tool in terms of 5-year patient survival after a kidney transplant. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all deceased-donor KT recipients between January 2009 to December 2021. A descriptive analysis of clinical and sociodemographic characteristics was performed. The SBE online tool was used to calculate the predicted patient survival (PPS) and the survival benefit at five years post-KT. Comparisons between predictive vs. actual patient survival were made using quintile subgroups. Three Cox regression models were built using PPS, EPTS, and KDPI. RESULTS: A total of 1145 recipients were evaluated. Mortality occurred in 157 patients. Patient survival was 86.2%. Predictive survival for patients if they remained on the waiting list was 70.6%. The PPS was 89.3%, which results in a survival benefit (SB) of 18.7% for our population. Actual survival rates were lower than the predicted ones across all the quintiles. In unadjusted analysis, PPS was a significant protective factor for mortality (HR 0.66), whereas EPTS (HR 8.9) and KDPI (HR 3.25) scores were significant risk factors. The discrimination of KDPI, PPS, and EPTS scores models were 0.59, 0.65, and 0.66, respectively. CONCLUSION: SBE score overestimated actual survival rates in our sample. The discrimination power of the score was moderate, although the utility of this tool may be limited in this specific population.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: The accuracy of the measurement of renal function in potential living kidney donors (PLKD) is essential. The direct measurement of glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) has been considered the "gold standard." The estimated GFR (eGFR) with 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance (CrCl) is frequently used because of its availability. We aim to evaluate the correlation and agreement of eGFR using serum-based creatinine formulas (Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, and CKD-EPI) and the eGFR based on 24-hour urinary CrCl to evaluate kidney function in PLKD. Methods: We evaluated the kidney function in 799 PLKD using 24-hour urinary CrCl method and compared the correlation and agreement with the eGFR based on creatinine formulas (Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, and CKD-EPI). We calculated the mean bias (difference), precision (SD of this difference), accuracy, and performed Bland-Altman plots. Results: A total of 799 PLKD were analyzed. The age of the PLKD ranged from 18 to 73 years. Weak to mild correlation was observed between 24-hour urinary CrCl and all formulas (ranged from 0.31 to 0.49). The three equations underestimated the GFR. Using the Bland-Altman graphic, we observed that the CKD-EPI was the least scattered and most precise; however, mean bias and the interval range (limits of agreement) of all formulas were too big to assume equivalence between 24-hour urinary CrCl method and eGFR based on creatinine. Results of mean bias were similar when comparing the three equations in patients with CrCl GFR <60. However, the accuracy of all formulas was better for the female group and the youngest individuals (≤40 years old). Conclusion: In this PLKD cohort, of all the three equations, the CKD-EPI was the least scattered and most precise. However, the correlation and the level of agreement between the three equations and 24-hour urinary CrCl were too low to assume the equivalence.

RESUMO

Introducción. La pandemia por COVID-19 ha causado la muerte de 6,5 millones de personas en el mundo y la donación de órganos se ha visto ampliamente afectada, reflejándose en una disminución importante en el número de trasplantes. Colombia no ha sido ajena a dicha problemática. Ante este desafío, el Instituto Nacional de Salud ha permitido tomar donantes cadavéricos con reacción en cadena de la polimerasa con transcripción reversa (RT-PCR) positiva para Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), sin enfermedad activa. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir una serie de pacientes trasplantados de riñón con donantes cadavéricos con RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positivo y sus principales desenlaces clínicos. Métodos. Serie de casos de pacientes que fueron llevados a trasplante renal con donante cadavérico con SARS-CoV-2 positivo, sin enfermedad activa, entre mayo y agosto de 2022. Se recolectaron las variables demográficas y clínicas y se evaluó la infección y la mortalidad asociada a SARS-CoV-2 en un mes de seguimiento. Resultados. Un total de 5 receptores de trasplante renal con 5 donantes cadavéricos SARS-CoV-2 positivos fueron evaluados. No se presentó mortalidad ni pérdida del injerto renal. Se registraron dos casos de función retardada del injerto y un caso de rechazo agudo. Ninguno de los pacientes presentó RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positiva en el seguimiento posterior al trasplante. Conclusión. Con nuestra serie de casos mostramos que el trasplante de riñón proveniente de donante cadavérico con prueba positiva para RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2, sin evidencia de enfermedad COVID-19 activa, es un procedimiento seguro y una estrategia eficaz para aumentar el número de donantes en pandemia

Introduction. Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have caused the death of 6.5 million of people worldwide. The organ donation was extremely affected reflecting in the number of transplants. Colombia has not been immune to this problem. Facing this challenge, the National Institute of Health (Instituto Nacional de Salud, INS) allowed to assign cadaveric donors with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive without COVID-19. We aim to describe a case series of kidney transplant patients with RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positive cadaveric donors, and their main clinical outcomes. Methods. A case series of five patients who underwent kidney transplantation of cadaveric donors with positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 during the study period from May to august of 2022. Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected from the institutional medical records, and we evaluated the mortality and infection associated with SARS-CoV-2. Results. A total of five kidney transplant recipients and five cadaveric donors with positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 were described in the present study. There were not mortality reported and none of the patients had graft loss. Two cases of delayed graft function and one case of acute kidney rejection were documented. None of the patients had positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 in the follow-up. Conclusion. Our series demonstrated that the kidney transplant of cadaveric donors with positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 without clinical evidence of active COVID-19 disease is a safe procedure and an efficient strategy to increase donors during a pandemic

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In Latin America, few reports are available about the clinical outcomes of living donor kidney transplants (LDKT). We aim to evaluate the main clinical outcomes for LDKT patients in a single center's experience. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 530 LDKT patients who underwent transplantation from August 2008 to December 2020 at Colombiana de Trasplantes. Graft survival censored for death and patient survival were determined up to 5 years post-transplantation by the Kaplan-Meier method. Vascular and urinary complications, readmission, and reintervention rates were documented. RESULTS: A total of 530 LDKT patients were analyzed. Most of the recipients were men (56%). There were 123 patients (23.2%) with a preemptive transplant. Panel reactive antibody type I and II had higher immunologic risk (>20%) in 15.9% of the patients. The donor mean age was 37.8 ± 11.5 years. Most of the donors were women (52.6%) and related to the recipient (69.1%). Multivariate analysis identified panel reactive antibody type II (P = 0.003), female donor (P = 0.001), surgical reintervention at 30 days post-transplantation (P < .01), and delayed graft function (P < .01) as risk factors for graft loss. The graft survival death-censored rates were 93.7% and 89% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Patient survival rates were 97.0% and 94.1% at 1 and 5 years after transplantation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term graft and patient survival rates in our center are comparable to previous reports from other leading centers. The clinical outcomes from a medium-sized center can be noteworthy, although not entirely new.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background and objectives: The administration of mannitol during laparoscopic hand-assisted nephrectomy in the living donor has been controversial with various recommendations about it. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the intraoperative mannitol in the living kidney donor and the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF). Methods: This study was a retrospective observational study with living kidney transplant recipients and donors who underwent laparoscopic hand-assisted nephrectomy at Colombiana de Trasplantes from January 2015 to September 2019. We assessed the impact of mannitol administration in living donors on the main transplant outcomes such as DGF, urinary volume, acute rejection, and mortality at 3 months of follow-up. We performed a descriptive analysis of demographics and clinical variables in our cohort. Results: A total of 367 recipients were evaluated. The incidence of DGF was 5.9% without mannitol versus 6.2% with mannitol (p = 0.99). The acute rejection episodes (12.2% without mannitol versus 4.7% with mannitol) had a trend difference between the comparative groups, but it was still not significant in the bivariate analysis (p = 0.06). The mortality rate in the recipient was not significant (p = 0.69). The mean serum creatinine did not have significant differences at 1 and 3 months of follow-up comparing both groups. Conclusion: The use of mannitol in living donors does not have a significant impact on the incidence of DGF in kidney recipients. A trend of association between mannitol administration and reduced acute rejection episodes was observed, though it was not statistically significant.

Antecedentes y objetivo: La administración de manitol durante la nefrectomía laparoscópica en el donante vivo ha sido discutida con diversas recomendaciones. El objetivo es evaluar la administración de manitol intraoperatorio en el donante vivo de riñón y la incidencia de función retardada del injerto en el receptor. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo con receptores de riñón y donantes vivos que tuvieron nefrectomía laparoscópica en Colombiana de Trasplantes entre enero de 2015 a septiembre de 2019. Evaluamos el impacto de administrar manitol en los principales desenlaces del trasplante: función retardada del injerto, volumen urinario, rechazo agudo y mortalidad del receptor a los 3 meses post-trasplante. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de las características demográficas y clínicas. Resultados: Se evaluaron 367 receptores con una incidencia de función retardada del injerto de 5.9% sin manitol versus 6.2% con manitol (p = 0,99), el rechazo agudo (12,2% sin manitol versus 4,7% con manitol) tuvo una tendencia de diferencia entre ambos grupos no significativa (p = 0,06) y la mortalidad del receptor tampoco mostró diferencias significativas (p = 0,69). La media de creatinina sérica al mes y 3 meses no tuvo diferencias significativas en los grupos. Conclusión: El uso de manitol en los donantes vivos de riñón no impactó significativamente la incidencia de función retardada del injerto en los receptores de trasplante. Se encontró una tendencia de asociación en la administración de manitol intraoperatorio y la reducción de los episodios de rechazo agudo al tercer mes post-trasplante en los receptores. No obstante, esta tendencia no tuvo la suficiente relevancia estadística.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background and Purpose: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best therapy for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Major urologic complications (MUCs) are the second etiology associated to morbidity and graft loss following KT, after rejection episodes. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence, risk factors and impact on graft survival associated to urological complications in KT patients. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort based on electronic patient files of kidney transplant recipients from Colombiana de Trasplantes was created for the period August 2008 to September 2019. Initiation of follow-up was defined as the date of transplantation up to 3 years post-transplantation. Incidence of ureteral stenosis, ureteral obstruction, and ureteral leak was measured. A logistic regression multivariate model was adjusted to determine the associated factors to MUCs (yes/no). Patient and graft survival time were analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 1584 KT patients were included in the cohort. MUCs were present in 195 (12.6%) KT patients. We found that dialysis duration (OR: 1.004; p = 0.02) remained significant for the incidence of MUCs in KT patients of deceased donors. Probability of graft and patient survival at 3 years of follow-up was 90.5% and 85.5%, respectively. No significant difference was found on graft and patient survival in KT patients with or without MUCs. Conclusion: MUCs are frequent complications for KT. We did not observe significant differences in graft or patient survival according to the presence of MUCs. The identification of MUCs and risk factors may guide transplant teams for future surgical and clinical decisions.

RESUMO

Introducción el síndrome de intolerancia es un proceso inflamatorio que ocurre hasta en un tercio de los pacientes con pérdida del injerto. Cuando no se obtiene una mejoría de los síntomas con el manejo médico, se indica la realización de nefrectomía del riñón trasplantado, sin embargo, este es un procedimiento invasivo que puede estar asociado a mayor morbilidad y mortalidad. Dada la fragilidad de estos pacientes, se plantea la embolización transcatéter del injerto como una alternativa válida y menos invasiva para el tratamiento de este síndrome. Objetivo describir el uso de la embolización transcatéter como tratamiento al síndrome de intolerancia del injerto. Presentación del caso se reportan tres casos clínicos de pacientes con sintomatología de entre 15 y 20 días de evolución, consistentes en dolor y tumefacción sobre riñón trasplantado y otros signos y síntomas reportados fueron fiebre, hiporexia, pérdida de peso y hematuria macroscópica. Se describe la evolución de los síntomas que en ninguno de los casos expuestos tuvieron mejoría con el ajuste inmunosupresor, descartando en todos los casos etiología infecciosa y estableciéndose así la sospecha síndrome de intolerancia del injerto. Los pacientes fueron manejados con embolización transcatéter de la arteria del riñón trasplantado y el éxito del tratamiento se definió por la resolución de los síntomas. Discusión y conclusión entre las primeras 24-48 horas posprocedimiento, los pacientes presentaron una evolución satisfactoria y, finalmente, egreso. La embolización transcatéter del injerto es una alternativa segura a la nefrectomía del trasplante y que es menos invasiva para el tratamiento del síndrome de intolerancia del injerto.

Background The renal graft intolerance syndrome is an inflammatory process that occurs in one third of the kidney transplant patients with graft loss. If medical treatment for intolerance graft syndrome is not effective, there is an indication of graft nephrectomy. However, graft nephrectomy has higher morbidity and mortality compared to non-invasive techniques. Due to a high fragility in kidney transplant patients, the renal arterial embolization has become a useful minimally invasive therapeutic option for intolerance graft syndrome. Objective We aim to describe the use of renal arterial embolization for renal graft intolerance syndrome. Case presentation We report three clinical cases who were admitted to the emergency department for a history of twenty days of graft pain and swelling. These patients had fever, hyporexia, weight loss and macroscopic hematuria. None of the cases had clinical improvement with immunosuppression adjustment and a diagnosis of renal graft intolerance syndrome was made dismissing infection. Patients were treated with renal arterial embolization and its procedure success were determined as the symptom's resolution. Discussion and conclusion After 24- and 48-hours post-embolization, patients were successfully recovered and discharged in the hospital. Renal graft arterial embolization is a safe and non-invasive alternative to graft nephrectomy to treat renal intolerance syndrome.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplantation is the best therapeutical option for CKD patients. Graft loss risk factors are usually estimated with the cox method. Competing risk analysis could be useful to determine the impact of different events affecting graft survival, the occurrence of an outcome of interest can be precluded by another. We aimed to determine the risk factors for graft loss in the presence of mortality as a competing event. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 1454 kidney transplant recipients who were transplanted between July 1, 2008, to May 31, 2019, in Colombiana de Trasplantes, were analyzed to determine risk factors of graft loss and mortality at 5 years post-transplantation. Kidney and patient survival probabilities were estimated by the competing risk analysis. The Fine and Gray method was used to fit a multivariable model for each outcome. Three variable selection methods were compared, and the bootstrapping technique was used for internal validation as split method for resample. The performance of the final model was assessed calculating the prediction error, brier score, c-index and calibration plot. RESULTS: Graft loss occurred in 169 patients (11.6%) and death in 137 (9.4%). Cumulative incidence for graft loss and death was 15.8% and 13.8% respectively. In a multivariable analysis, we found that BKV nephropathy, serum creatinine and increased number of renal biopsies were significant risk factors for graft loss. On the other hand, recipient age, acute cellular rejection, CMV disease were risk factors for death, and recipients with living donor had better survival compared to deceased-donor transplant and coronary stent. The c-index were 0.6 and 0.72 for graft loss and death model respectively. CONCLUSION: We developed two prediction models for graft loss and death 5 years post-transplantation by a unique transplant program in Colombia. Using a competing risk multivariable analysis, we were able to identify 3 significant risk factors for graft loss and 5 significant risk factors for death. This contributes to have a better understanding of risk factors for graft loss in a Latin-American population. The predictive performance of the models was mild.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Contexto: la pandemia por COVID-19 generó la reestructuración de los servicios de salud en el mundo. La teleconsulta ofrece el acceso a la atención en salud a distancia como estrategia de mitigación a la propagación del virus y como una forma flexible de telemedicina. Objetivo: describir los resultados de atención en salud por modalidad de teleconsulta en pacientes trasplantados durante el inicio de la pandemia por COVID-19. Metodología: estudio descriptivo de corte transversal que describe la experiencia del uso de la teleconsulta en el inicio de la pandemia por COVID-19 en un centro de trasplante de órganos en Colombia. La información fue obtenida mediante la recolección directa de la atención en el mes de abril de 2020 y a través del envío de un cuestionario electrónico, estructurado para los pacientes atendidos por teleconsulta. Resultados: un total de 1139 pacientes con trasplante renal fueron valorados en la modalidad de teleconsulta. Alrededor del 50 % de los pacientes atendidos vivían fuera de áreas metropolitanas (n = 564) y un total de 292 (de 800 contactados) respondieron la encuesta enviada con una media de edad de 48 años. Los pacientes presentaron altos porcentajes de satisfacción con el modelo de teleconsulta (n = 278, lo que equivale al 94 %). Se presentaron dos casos sospechosos de COVID-19, los cuales fueron negativos al realizar la prueba de PCR-RT. Conclusiones: la teleconsulta es una herramienta útil en la mitigación de la emergencia sanitaria, con un alto potencial que genera mayor acceso y oportunidad de atención en salud, presentando altos índices de aceptación.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic led to the restructuring of health services around the world. Teleconsultation offers access to remote health care and a mitigation strategy. Purpose: Describe the results of a teleconsultation program in a transplant center at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology: Descriptive cross-sectional study describing the experience of the use of teleconsultation during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic at an organ transplant center in Colombia. The information was obtained by directly collecting the total number of patients treated during April 2020 and by sending a structured electronic questionnaire to the patients involved in the care. Results: A total of 1139 renal transplant patients were assessed by teleconsultation. The geographical distribution of patients in metropolitan areas and outside the metropolitan area were similar (n=575 and n=564, respectively). Of the total, 292 patients responded to the survey sent with an average age of 48 years. The patients had high satisfaction with the teleconsultation model (n=278, 94%). There were 2 suspected cases of COVID-19, which were negative when performing the PCR-RT test. Conclusions: Teleconsultation is a useful tool in the mitigation of the health emergency, with a high potential, which generates greater access and health care opportunity, presenting high acceptance rates.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Vascular multiplicity is the most frequent anatomic variation in kidney donors. Despite concerns about risks, these allografts are increasingly used to overcome the shortage of kidney donors. The safety and clinical outcomes in living kidney donors were evaluated with vascular multiplicity after hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (HALDN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from all living kidney donors who underwent HALDN from 2008 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups as single (SRV) and multiple renal vessels (MRV), and a comparative analysis was done. The primary outcomes include operating room time (ORT), days of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, complications, conversion, and re-operations. RESULTS: MRV were present in 166 out of 612 donors (27.1%). Among those, 10 (1.6%) donors had simultaneous multiple arteries and veins. Additionally, the prevalence of artery and vein multiplicity was 21.8% (n = 134) and 3.5% (n = 22), respectively. Warm ischemia time was significantly different among the two groups but not clinically important. The number of conversions to open technique, the mean ORT, the median blood loss, and days of hospital stay were similar between the SRV and MRV groups, without significant differences. According to the modified Clavien-classification system, no differences were found in the complication rates between the two groups (p = 0.29). Complication rates were 3.3% and 3.6% for the SRV and MRV groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: HALDN is a procedure with safe intraoperative results, even with vascular multiplicity. The presence of multiple renal arteries or veins has no negative impact on the outcome of the donor after living donor nephrectomy.