RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of immunobiologics for the management of oral disease in Sjögren's syndrome (SS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE® , Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for evidence on the use of immunobiologics for management of glandular disease in SS. Primary outcomes were xerostomia and salivary gland dysfunction, assessed via visual analogue scales, disease-specific scales for SS, measurement of salivary flow, ultrasound data, and quality of life measures. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (11 randomized controlled trials and 6 observational studies) met inclusion criteria. Rituximab showed efficacy in improving salivary gland function but not xerostomia. Abatacept showed promise in improving both xerostomia and salivary flow. Belimumab exhibited long-term improvement of salivary flow and subjective measures. The novel agent CFZ533 improved both disease activity and patient-reported indexes. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong evidence pointing to the efficacy of rituximab in the management of oral disease in SS. Future controlled trials may elucidate the efficacy of belimumab and abatacept. The new drug CFZ533 is a promising alternative for the management of SS and its salivary gland involvement. In considering these agents, the promise of efficacy must be balanced against the harmful effects associated with biologic agents.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Doenças das Glândulas Salivares/terapia , Glândulas Salivares/fisiopatologia , Síndrome de Sjogren/tratamento farmacológico , Xerostomia/fisiopatologia , Congressos como Assunto , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Saliva/química , Saliva/metabolismo , Doenças das Glândulas Salivares/patologia , Síndrome de Sjogren/fisiopatologia , Escala Visual AnalógicaRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: A validated scoring system is essential to assess the effect of therapeutic interventions on a disease. The instrument introduced here captures sarcoidosis disease activity in a reliable, reproducible manner, which will help standardize clinical trial outcomes and allow comparative efficacy studies in the future and may help lead to more robust data regarding the effect of different treatments on cutaneous sarcoidosis. OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and convergent validity of the Cutaneous Sarcoidosis Activity and Morphology Instrument (CSAMI) and Sarcoidosis Activity and Severity Index (SASI) for evaluating cutaneous sarcoidosis outcomes. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study evaluating cutaneous sarcoidosis disease severity using CSAMI, SASI, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) as reference in the dedicated cutaneous sarcoidosis clinic of a teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Eight dermatologists evaluating cutaneous sarcoidosis in 11 patients. INTERVENTION: Evaluation using the study instruments. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes included interrater and intrarater reliability and convergent validity; secondary outcomes, correlation with quality-of-life measures and time required for completion. RESULTS: All instruments demonstrated good to excellent intrarater reliability. Interrater reliability was excellent for CSAMI Activity scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.66-0.94]) and fair to poor for CSAMI Damage scores (0.42 [0.21-0.72]), modified Facial SASI (0.40 [0.17-0.72]), and PGA scores (0.40 [0.18-0.70]). CSAMI Activity and Damage scores and modified Facial SASI all demonstrated convergent validity with statistically significant correlations with PGA scores. Trends for correlations were seen between CSAMI scores and specific Skindex-29 quality-of-life domains. Although CSAMI required longer time to complete than SASI, both were scored within adequate time for use in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: CSAMI appears to be a reliable and valid outcome instrument to measure cutaneous sarcoidosis and may capture a wide range of body surface and cutaneous morphologic types. This instrument can be adopted into clinical practice and clinical trials to allow physicians to assess the intensity of their patients' cutaneous sarcoidosis disease activity. Widespread use of one metric for disease severity assessment can help standardize the evaluation of the effect of various treatments on the disease. Future research is necessary to demonstrate its sensitivity to change and to confirm its correlation with quality-of-life measures.