RESUMO
Abstract Immune checkpoints inhibitors have shown a re markable improvement in overall survival of stage IV renal cell carcinoma patients. Nevertheless, there is a wide range of immune-related adverse events (IRAE) that arise from these revolutionary treatments. Autoim mune encephalitis is a rare but severe central nervous system IRAE in these cancer patients. The severities of these IRAEs preclude patients from continuing im munotherapy treatment. Few cases of autoimmune encephalitis with immunotherapy have been described in the literature and optimal clinical management of these events as well as patient's immune-mediated response after treatment suspension is still unclear. Here, we report a case of a 67 years-old woman with stage IV renal cell carcinoma under treatment with nivolumab who developed autoimmune encephalitis. After high doses of corticosteroids patient's condition improved significantly with full recovery after 5 days of treatment. Even though nivolumab was not reinstalled, a persistent response of her oncologic disease was evi denced. We expect that this case can contribute to the existing literature of both subjects, the management of autoimmune encephalitis as grade IV immune related adverse event and the responses of immune checkpoint inhibitors after IRAE.
Resumen Los inhibidores de puntos de control inmunológico han mostrado una importante mejoría en la supervi vencia global de los pacientes con carcinoma de riñón estadio IV. Sin embargo, existe una amplia variedad de efectos adversos inmunomediados que surgen a partir de estos tratamientos revolucionarios. La encefalitis au toinmune es un infrecuente pero grave efecto adverso inmunomediado del sistema nervioso central en estos pacientes. La gravedad de este cuadro impide que los pa cientes continúen con el tratamiento de inmunoterapia. Se han descrito pocos casos de encefalitis autoinmune con inmunoterapia en la literatura y aún no está claro el manejo clínico óptimo de estos eventos, ni cómo continua la respuesta inmunomediada después de la suspensión del tratamiento. Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 67 años con carcinoma de células renales estadio IV que desarrolló encefalitis autoinmune durante el tratamiento con nivolumab. La paciente mejoró significativamente luego del inicio del tratamiento con altas dosis de cor ticoides, con una recuperación completa después de 5 días del mismo. Si bien el nivolumab no se reinició, se evidenció una respuesta persistente de su enfermedad oncológica. Esperamos que este caso pueda contribuir a la literatura existente de ambos temas, el manejo de la encefalitis autoinmune como efecto adverso inmunome diado grado IV y las respuestas que se obtienen con la inmunoterapia luego de estos efectos adversos.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients' lack of knowledge about their own disease may function as a barrier to shared decision-making and well-being. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of written educational materials on breast cancer patients. METHODS: This multicenter, parallel, unblinded, randomized trial included Latin American women aged ≥18 years with a recent breast cancer diagnosis yet to start systemic therapy. Participants underwent randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive a customizable or standard educational brochure. The primary objective was accurate identification of molecular subtype. Secondary objectives included identification of clinical stage, treatment options, participation in decision-making, perceived quality of information received, and illness uncertainty. Follow-up occurred at 7-21 and 30-51 days post-randomization. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT05798312. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five breast cancer patients with a median age of 53 years and 61 days from diagnosis were included (customizable: 82; standard: 83). At first available assessment, 52%, 48%, and 30% identified their molecular subtype, disease stage, and guideline-endorsed systemic treatment strategy, respectively. Accurate molecular subtype and stage identification were similar between groups. Per multivariate analysis, customizable brochure recipients were more likely to identify their guideline-recommended treatment modalities (OR: 4.20,p = 0.001). There were no differences between groups in the perceived quality of information received or illness uncertainty. Customizable brochure recipients reported increased participation in decision-making (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Over one third of recently diagnosed breast cancer patients are incognizant of their disease characteristics and treatment options. This study demonstrates a need to improve patient education and shows that customizable educational materials increase patients' understanding of recommended systemic therapies according to individual breast cancer characteristics.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Folhetos , Tomada de Decisão CompartilhadaRESUMO
Immune checkpoints inhibitors have shown a remarkable improvement in overall survival of stage IV renal cell carcinoma patients. Nevertheless, there is a wide range of immune-related adverse events (IRAE) that arise from these revolutionary treatments. Autoimmune encephalitis is a rare but severe central nervous system IRAE in these cancer patients. The severities of these IRAEs preclude patients from continuing immunotherapy treatment. Few cases of autoimmune encephalitis with immunotherapy have been described in the literature and optimal clinical management of these events as well as patient's immune-mediated response after treatment suspension is still unclear. Here, we report a case of a 67 years-old woman with stage IV renal cell carcinoma under treatment with nivolumab who developed autoimmune encephalitis. After high doses of corticosteroids patient's condition improved significantly with full recovery after 5 days of treatment. Even though nivolumab was not reinstalled, a persistent response of her oncologic disease was evidenced. We expect that this case can contribute to the existing literature of both subjects, the management of autoimmune encephalitis as grade IV immune related adverse event and the responses of immune checkpoint inhibitors after IRAE.
Los inhibidores de puntos de control inmunológico han mostrado una importante mejoría en la supervivencia global de los pacientes con carcinoma de riñón estadio IV. Sin embargo, existe una amplia variedad de efectos adversos inmunomediados que surgen a partir de estos tratamientos revolucionarios. La encefalitis autoinmune es un infrecuente pero grave efecto adverso inmunomediado del sistema nervioso central en estos pacientes. La gravedad de este cuadro impide que los pacientes continúen con el tratamiento de inmunoterapia. Se han descrito pocos casos de encefalitis autoinmune con inmunoterapia en la literatura y aún no está claro el manejo clínico óptimo de estos eventos, ni cómo continua la respuesta inmunomediada después de la suspensión del tratamiento. Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 67 años con carcinoma de células renales estadio IV que desarrolló encefalitis autoinmune durante el tratamiento con nivolumab. La paciente mejoró significativamente luego del inicio del tratamiento con altas dosis de corticoides, con una recuperación completa después de 5 días del mismo. Si bien el nivolumab no se reinició, se evidenció una respuesta persistente de su enfermedad oncológica. Esperamos que este caso pueda contribuir a la literatura existente de ambos temas, el manejo de la encefalitis autoinmune como efecto adverso inmunomediado grado IV y las respuestas que se obtienen con la inmunoterapia luego de estos efectos adversos.
Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes do Sistema Nervoso , Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Nivolumabe/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/induzido quimicamenteRESUMO
Around 20% of breast cancers are associated with amplification or overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). In this setting, anti-HER2-targeted agents are the cornerstone of cancer therapeutic strategies. This includes monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and, recently, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). With the advent of these new alternatives, the decision-making process has become more complex, especially with regard to the treatment sequence possibilities. In spite of the fact that overall survival has significantly improved accordingly, resistance to treatment remains a challenge in HER2-positive breast cancer. The introduction of new agents has created awareness regarding new potential specific adverse events, and consequently, their increasing application pose major challenges in daily patient care. This review describes the therapeutic landscape for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) and evaluates its benefits and risks in the clinical setting.
RESUMO
Background: Breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease with large differences in the risk of recurrence. An elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is correlated with a poor prognosis in a variety of tumors, and although it is still controversial in breast cancer, there are multiple studies, including meta-analysis, suggesting this. The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognostic value of preoperative NLR in an Argentine population of patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer, not exposed to neoadjuvant treatment. Methods: Retrospective multicenter cohort study that includes patients over 18 years of age from three centers in the city and province of Buenos Aires who have had surgery for early breast cancer between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2014. Based on the previous literature, a cutoff value of 2.0 was defined. Results: A total of 791 patients were eligible for the analysis. Median age was 55 years (IQR 45-65). Median NLR was 1.92 (IQR 1.50-2.56). The distribution of groups according to the 8th edition of the AJCC was 54.1% for stage I, 35.6% stage II, and 10.4% stage III. Among the different tumor phenotypes, 79.0% were HR+/HER2-, 11.4% were HR+ or-/HER2+, and 9.2% were HR-/HER2-. With a median follow-up of 5.3 years, 112 patients (14.2%) had disease recurrence. Stage III patients had a higher NLR than stage I and stage II patients (p = 0.002). The rest of the clinical and pathological characteristics did not show differences in the groups according to NLR. There were no differences in relapse-free survival according to the NLR (p = 0.37), and it did not change after adjusting for other prognostic variables. Conclusion: We consider it is important to determine the efficacy of prognostic markers that are easily accessible and of simple, systematic application. However, NLR does not appear to be an independent prognostic factor for recurrence in our population. In this sense, we consider it is important to publish negative results in order to avoid publication bias.
RESUMO
RESUMEN Introducción: La cardio-oncología (CO) es una nueva disciplina, que genera nuevas áreas de trabajo en las instituciones. Desconocemos cuántos equipos de CO existen en nuestro país, su estructura y el manejo de los pacientes. Objetivos: Nuestro objetivo primario es reportar cuántos centros de CO existen en nuestro país, y de ellos cuántos trabajan de acuerdo con las recomendaciones de guías y consensos. Secundariamente, definir la especialidad y formación de los médicos integrantes, si se realiza evaluación de riesgo previo al inicio del tratamiento oncológico, cómo se evalúa la función ventricular y cómo se utilizan los biomarcadores. Material y métodos: Registro nacional, multicéntrico, transversal, descriptivo, y prospectivo que incluyó 51 instituciones generales, de oncología y/o de cardiología que referían poseer grupos de trabajo o servicios de CO. Resultados: De los 51 centros, pertenecen al ámbito público el 47,1% y al privado el 52,9%. El 49% se halla en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, el 17,6% en la Provincia de Buenos Aires y el resto en otros lugares del país. Sobre 47 centros, el 48,9% considera funcionar de acuerdo con las recomendaciones de Guías Internacionales y el Consenso de la Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología. El 27,7% de los centros realiza siempre estratificación de riesgo cardio-oncológico o cardiovascular antes de iniciar el tratamiento. Un 35,3% de los centros deriva siempre a cardiología a los pacientes que iniciarán un tratamiento potencialmente cardiotóxico, un 47,1% ocasionalmente. El 43,1% de los centros realiza ecocardiografía basal en todos los pacientes, el 56,9% solo en algunos. Durante el seguimiento el ecocardiograma se indica de acuerdo con el esquema utilizado en el 64,7% y en el resto según su evolución. Todos los centros evalúan la fracción de eyección ventricular izquierda mediante ecocardiografía, en el 68,1% bidimensional. El 63,8% utiliza el análisis de la deformación longitudinal sistólica global. El 47,1% deriva algunos pacientes a resonancia cardíaca y el 35,3% a tomografía cardíaca. Solo el 7,8% utiliza biomarcadores. El 5,9% indica siempre prevención primaria con antagonistas neurohormonales. El dexrazoxano es utilizado en el 5,9%, la antraciclina liposomal en el 74,5%. Frente a la aparición de cardiotoxicidad, el 76,5% inicia tratamiento cardioprotector. El 41% suspende la quimioterapia, el 47% la modifica. Conclusiones: este es el primer registro nacional de CO. Brinda información y un panorama actual del estado de esta subespecialidad en nuestro país. Casi la mitad de los centros consideró funcionar de acuerdo con Guías y Consensos. Solo un tercio de los pacientes que van a iniciar tratamiento oncológico potencialmente cardiotóxico son derivados a CO. El método más utilizado en nuestro país para evaluar la función ventricular es el ecocardiograma bidimensional, los biomarcadores son poco utilizados.
ABSTRACT Background: Cardio-oncology (CO) is a new discipline that generates new work areas within the institutions. We ignore how many CO teams exist in our country, their structure and how patients are managed. Objectives: Our primary objective is to report how many CO centers exist in our country, and how many of them work according to the recommendations of guidelines and consensus statements. We also want to define the specialty and specific training of the physicians involved, determine if they perform risk assessment before cancer treatment, establish the method used to assess ventricular function and how biomarkers are used. Methods: The OBELISCO registry is a national, multicenter, cross-sectional, descriptive and prospective registry including 51 general hospitals, cancer centers and institutions specialized in cardiology with CO work groups or services. Results: Of the 51 centers, 47.1% were public hospitals and 52.9% were private centers. Most centers were in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (49%) and in the Province of Buenos Aires and the rest were distributed throughout the country. Of 47 centers, 48.9% considered that their institution had CO services complying with the recommendations of international guidelines and of the consensus statement of the Argentine Society of Cardiology. Global cardio-oncological or cardiovascular risk assessment is always performed in 27.7% of the centers before starting treatment. Patients who will start potentially cardiotoxic treatment are always referred to cardiology in 35.3% of the centers and are sometimes referred to cardiology in 47.1%. Baseline echocardiography is performed in all the patients before starting treatment in 43.1% of the centers and only in some patients in 56.9%. During follow-up, echocardiography is indicated according to the treatment schedule used in 64.7% and according to the patients' outcome in the rest of the centers. All the centers evaluate left ventricular ejection fraction with echocardiography, and 68.1% use twodimensional echocardiography. Global longitudinal systolic strain is used in 63.8% of the centers. Only 47.1% order cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in some patients, and 35.3% indicate cardiac computed tomography scan. Biomarkers are used in only 7.8% of the centers. Primary prevention with neurohormonal antagonist drugs is always indicated in 5.9% of the centers. Dexrazoxane is used in only 5.9% and liposomal anthracycline in 74.5% If cardiotoxicity develops, 76.5% indicate cardioprotection, 41% discontinue chemotheraphy and 47% modify cancer treatment. Conclusions: This is the first national CO registry. It provides information and a current outlook of the status of this subspecialty in our country. Almost 50% of the centers considered to be functioning in line with guidelines and consensus statements. Only one third of the patients who will initiate cancer treatment with potentially cardiotoxic drugs are referred to CO. Two-dimensional echocardiography is the method most used in our country to evaluate ventricular function; biomarkers are scarcely used.
RESUMO
The A.A.E.E.H has developed this guideline for the best care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from Argentina. It was done from May 2018 to March 2020. Specific clinical research questions were systematically searched. The quality of evidence and level of recommendations were organized according to GRADE. HCC surveillance is strongly recommended with abdominal ultrasound (US) every six months in the population at risk for HCC (cirrhosis, hepatitis B or hepatitis C); it is suggested to add alpha-feto protein (AFP) levels in case of inexeperienced sonographers. Imaging diagnosis in patients at risk for HCC has high specificity and tumor biopsy is not mandatory. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer algorithm is strongly recommended for HCC staging and treatment-decision processes. Liver resection is strongly recommended for patients without portal hypertension and preserved liver function. Composite models are suggested for liver transplant selection criteria. Therapies for HCC with robust clinical evidence include transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and first to second line systemic treatment options (sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib and ramucirumab). Immunotherapy with nivolumab and pembrolizumab has failed to show statistical benefit but the novel combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has recently shown survival benefit over sorafenib in frontline.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Oncologia/normas , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/normas , Algoritmos , Argentina , Biópsia/normas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Consenso , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia/normasRESUMO
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Recent advances in the management of non-small cell carcinoma are focused on the discovery of targeted therapies and novel immunotherapy strategies for patients with advanced disease. Treatment with anti PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitors requires the development of predictive biomarkers to select those patients that can most benefit from these therapies. Several immunohistochemical biomarkers have been developed in different technological platforms. However, the most useful and accessible for the daily clinical practice need to be selected. The objective of this study was to compare PD-L1 expression by automated immunohistochemistry in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) FFPE samples with clones 28-8 and SP263 performed with the BenchMark GX automated staining instrument. To further determine interobserver agreement between two pathologists, and to correlate the results with histologic and pathology variables. FFPE tissue from 40 samples obtained from patients with lung ADC were reviewed retrospectively. Among all studied specimens, 53% of samples presented <1% of positive tumor cells with the 28-8 clone and 50% had <1% of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells with the SP263 clone; PD-L1 expression between ≥1 and <5% was observed in 18% and 24%; ≥5 and <50% PD-L1 expression in 18% and 21%; and ≥50% PD-L1 expression in 11% and 5% of samples, respectively. Similar results between antibodies were observed in 84% of cases for each of the four PD-L1 cutoff groups (Pearson's score 0.90, p < 0.00001). The interobserver degree of agreement calculated with Kappa was 0.75 (95%CI: 0.57-0.93), z = 7.08; p < 0.001. Lepidic, acinar and mucinous patterns had predominantly <1% PD-L1 expression, and the solid pattern subtype had high levels of PD-L1 staining using both clones. PD-L1 expression in less than 1% of tumor cells was similar in stages I/II compared to III/IV. No significant differences were observed in PD-L1 staining and quantification pattern between IHC antibodies 28-8 and SP263.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Multiple studies have reported that breast cancer in young patients is associated with aggressive characteristics, and it is suggested that prognosis is worse independently of pathologic variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Breast Cancer Registry of the Argentinian Society of Mastology, including public and private centers. Patients ≤ 40 years of age at diagnosis were classified as "young," and patients ≤ 35 years of age at diagnosis were classified as "very young." Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to detect differences between groups. RESULTS: Patients ≤ 40 years of age comprised 10.40% (739/7,105) of the participants, with an average age of 35.61 ± 4.04 years. Multivariate analysis showed that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumor phenotype (odds ratio [OR], 1.82), nodal involvement (OR, 1.69), histologic grade (grade 3 OR, 1.41), and tumor size (T2 OR, 1.37; T3-T4, 1.47) were independently associated with younger age at diagnosis. Patients ≤ 35 years of age (n = 286), compared with patients 36 to 40 years of age, had a higher proportion of HER2 tumors (24.58% v 16.94%; P = .021), absence of progesterone receptor expression (29.85% v 22.95%; P = .043), and stage 3 cancer (29.34% v 18.52%; P < .001). Fewer breast-conserving surgeries (75.37% v 62.89%; P < .001) and more adjuvant chemotherapy (59.04% v 36.66%; P < 0.001) were reported in patients ≤ 40 years of age. CONCLUSION: In the population studied, breast cancer in young women was associated with aggressive pathologic features and locally advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. Moreover, tumor characteristics in very young patients with breast cancer nested in the population ≤ 40 years of age showed differences in important prognostic factors. More high-quality evidence is needed to improve treatment strategies in these patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia Segmentar , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nivolumab was the first anti-programmed cell death 1 drug approved in Argentina for non-small-cell lung cancer treatment in the second-line setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was a multicenter, observational, retrospective study of patients with progression to stage IV NSCLC during platinum-based chemotherapy who had received nivolumab monotherapy in a drug-expanded access program in Argentina. RESULTS: The data from 109 patients were assessed retrospectively for safety and clinical outcomes. The follow-up period was 8.83 months (interquartile range, 3.4-12.67); 57.8% were men, 29.4% were current smokers, and 78.0% had a diagnosis of nonsquamous cell cancer. The median number of chemotherapy lines before nivolumab was 2 (range, 1-4). Also, 59.6% had received radiotherapy and 89% had received platinum-based chemotherapy. The drug-related toxicity rate was 78.9%, the grade 2-3 toxicity rate was 28.4%, and 33.9% of patients had required corticosteroids. The treatment response was evaluated in 104 patients. The best response was a complete response in 2 (2%), partial response in 28 (27%), stable disease in 33 (32%), and progressive disease in 41 (39%). Univariate analysis revealed that the absence of corticosteroid use (P = .034), toxicity grade 1-3 (P = .0025), and performance status of ≤ 1 (P = .049) were associated with longer disease-free survival, performance status of ≤ 1 (P < .001), and toxicity grade 1-3 (P = .001) were associated with longer overall survival. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, toxicity grade 1-3 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.81; P = .008) and age ≤ 50 years (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.61; P = .001) were associated with longer progression-free survival and corticosteroid use was associated with shorter progression-free survival (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.22-3.48; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: The use of nivolumab in the real world setting in patients with heavily pretreated NSCLC was well tolerated and showed promising clinical efficacy. The performance status, use of corticosteroids, and immune-mediated toxicity seem to be the conditions that can affect the clinical outcomes.