RESUMO
The limited supply of kidneys for pediatric transplantation leads to a large number of children in waiting transplant list. These patients have to be properly evaluated and prepared before organ transplantation to increase its success. The aim of this review is focus on urologic issues of pediatric kidney transplants such as preoperative evaluation and urinary tract abnormalities correction, surgical technique, and postoperative complications. All children that are candidates for kidney transplantation should be submitted to abdominal ultrasound. If bladder dysfunction is suspected, a more detailed evaluation is mandatory, including a voiding cystourethrography and urodynamic study. Patients with a poor bladder capacity and compliance will require bladder augmentation. Whenever possible the native ureter is recommended for that. Regarding kidney transplantation, recipient surgery can be safely performed through an extraperitoneal access, even in children weighting less than 10 kilograms. It allows adequate access to iliac vessels, aorta and vena cava. Graft survival continued to improve over the past decade and it is around 80% in 5 years. Postoperative complications such as urinary fistula may occur in less than 5% of cases, while vascular complications are reported in 1% to 2% of cases.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To study the efficacy of Low intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (Li- ESWT) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in kidney transplanted men. METHODS: Twenty men (mean age = 53.7 years) were selected. This was a double-blinded, prospective, randomized, sham-controlled trial. The ESWT protocol was based in a 2 treatment sessions per week for 3 weeks. The sham treatment was performed using the same device replacing the effective probe for one that emits zero energy. Baseline and follow-up assessment was performed with International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire (IIEF) score and Erection Hardness Score (EHS) after 1, 4 and 12 months. Penile Doppler was performed before and after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were recruited, 10 patients in each group. Baseline scores were similar. The mean EHS in after 1 month were 2.5 ± 0.85 (Li-EWST) and 2.4 ± 0.7 (Sham therapy), p = 0.724 . After 4 months it was 2.4 ± 0.7 and 2.6 ± 0.84, p = 0,0004 (between the moments) . The baseline IIEF score was 14.9 ± 3(Sham Theraphy) and 10.9 ± 5.1 (Li-EWST). The mean IIEF score after 1 month was 15.6 ± 6.1 (Li-EWST) and 16.6 ± 5.4 (Sham therapy). The mean IIEF score after 4 months was 17.2 ± 5.7 (Li-EWST) and 16.5 ± 5 (Sham therapy), p < 0.0001 (between the moments). IIEF score improvement was higher than 5 in 70% (ranged from 0-10) and in 10% (ranged from 1-14) in Li-ESWT and Sham groups, respectively. The mean change in IIEF score after 12 months was 4.8 in Li-ESWT group .Penile Doppler parameters were similar between groups and did not present improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Li-ESWT is a treatment with clinical efficacy. Despite evidences suggesting neoagiogenesis, our short protocol had no impact in penile Doppler parameters.
Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Transplante de Rim , Pênis/fisiopatologia , Terapia por Ultrassom , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ereção Peniana , Pênis/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia DopplerRESUMO
The incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) after kidney transplantation (KT) caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria is growing. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of UTI caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) in the survival of graft and recipients following KT. This was a retrospective cohort study involving patients who underwent KT between 2013 and 2016. Patients were followed since the day of the KT until loss of graft, death or end of the follow-up period (31th December 2016). The outcomes measured were UTI by MDR following KT and graft and patient survival. Analyses were performed using Cox regression; for the graft and patient survival analysis, we used a propensity score for UTI by CR-GNB to matching a control group. UTI was diagnosed in 178 (23.9%) of 781 patients, who developed 352 UTI episodes. 44.6% of the UTI cases were caused by MDR bacteria. Identified risk factors for UTI by MDR bacteria were DM, urologic disease as the cause of end-stage renal failure, insertion of ureteral stent, carbapenem use, and delayed graft function (DGF). Risk factors for death during the follow-up period were female gender, patients over 60 years old at the time of KT, DM, body mass index over 31.8, UTI caused by CR-GNB. In conclusion, UTIs caused by CR-GNB have great impact on patients' survival after KT.
Assuntos
Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/fisiologia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Resistência beta-Lactâmica , Fatores Etários , Função Retardada do Enxerto/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Rejeição de Enxerto/microbiologia , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Incidência , Falência Renal Crônica/etiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Análise de Sobrevida , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate a prolonged outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter gergoviae (CREG) involving kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) between 2009 and 2014. METHODS: A case-control study was undertaken. Controls (nâ=â52) were selected from CREG-negative KTRs. Surveillance cultures for CREG were collected weekly. Colonization was defined as isolation of CREG from surveillance samples or from clinical specimens, with no evidence of infection. We also investigated infection control practices at the facility. RESULTS: Of 26 identified cases, 13 had had no known contact with another CREG-positive patient before the first positive culture. Seven patients (27%) developed infection. The site most often colonized was the urinary tract. During the study period two clusters were identified, one in 2009 and another in 2013-14. DNA sequencing revealed blaIMP-1 in all CREG tested. No environmental or hand cultures tested positive for CREG. An audit of infection control practices detected flaws in the handling and cleaning of urinary tract devices. Multivariate analysis identified advanced age, ureteral stent use, retransplantation and male gender as risk factors for CREG acquisition. CONCLUSIONS: An outbreak among KTRs caused by an unusual species of MDR bacteria may have resulted from a common source of contamination related to urinary tract devices.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Surtos de Doenças , Enterobacter/enzimologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Resistência beta-Lactâmica , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Enterobacter/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Transplante de Rim , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Transplantados , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Adulto Jovem , beta-Lactamases/genéticaRESUMO
To describe a single-center experience with kidney transplantation and then study some donor and recipient features that may impact on graft survival and urological complication rates. We reviewed our database searching for pediatric patients who underwent kidney transplantation from August 1985 through November 2012. Preoperative data and postoperative complications were recorded. Graft survival rates were analyzed and compared based on the type of donor, donor's age from deceased donors, and recipients' ESRD cause. Kaplan-Meier curves with log rank and Wilcoxon tests were used to perform the comparisons. There were 305 pediatric kidney transplants. The mean recipient's age was 11.7 yr. The mean follow-up was 11.0 yr. Arterial and venous thrombosis rates were 1.6% and 2.3%, respectively, while urinary fistula and symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux were diagnosed in 2.9% and 3.6% of cases, respectively. Deceased kidney transplantation had a lower graft survival rate than living kidney transplantation (log rank, p = 0.005). Donor's age (p = 0.420) and ESRD cause (p = 0.679) were not significantly related to graft survival rate. In long-term follow-up, type of donor, but not donor's age, impacts on graft survival rate. ESRD cause has no impact on graft survival rate, showing that well-evaluated recipients may have good outcomes.
Assuntos
Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Trombose/etiologia , Fístula Urinária/etiologia , Refluxo Vesicoureteral/etiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Trombose/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Fístula Urinária/epidemiologia , Refluxo Vesicoureteral/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and long-term outcomes of use of the inferior epigastric artery (IEA) for revascularization of small accessory kidney arteries (3 mm or less). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 602 living-donor kidney transplants were reviewed. Age was 37.4 ± 15 years (range, 3-78 years). Multiple arteries were present in 98 kidneys (16.3%); of these, 83 (84.7%) had 2 and arteries and 15 (15.3%) had 3 arteries. In 21 kidneys (21.4%) with multiple arteries (group I [GI]), the IEA was used for reconstruction. Four (14.3%) had 3 arteries, and 17 (85.7%) had 2 arteries. In 77 patients (group II [GII]), the inferior accessory renal artery was reconstructed with a side-to-side or an end-to-side anastomosis to the main renal artery. Follow-up was 43.8 ± 38.1 months (range, 1-124 months). The Fisher exact test and the 2-tailed t test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Delayed graft function occurred in 1 GI patient (4.8%) and in 5 GII patients (6.5%; P >.05). One partial renal infarction occurred in each group (4.8% vs 1.3%; P >.05). There was 1 urinary fistula in GI and 3 urinary fistulas and 1 ureteral stenosis in GII (P >.05). One graft (4.8%) lost function in GI and 5 (6.5%) in GII (P >.05). Eleven patients (53.4%) were hypertensive in GI and 53 (68.8%) in GII (P >.05). CONCLUSION: The use of the IEA for revascularization of a living-donor kidney transplant with multiple arteries is safe and effective, yielding similar long-term outcomes compared with the standard technique. Use of the IEA avoids the risks of manipulation of the main renal artery.
Assuntos
Artérias Epigástricas/transplante , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Rim/irrigação sanguínea , Rim/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Doadores Vivos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Enxerto Vascular , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Recurrent transplant pyelonephritis (RTP) secondary to vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) to the transplant kidney (KTx) remains a significant cause of infectious complications with impact on patient and graft outcomes. Our objective was to verify the safety and efficacy of transurethral injection of Durasphere(®) to relieve RTP secondary to VUR after renal transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2004 and July 2008, eight patients with RTP (defined as two or more episodes of pyelonephritis after transplantation) and VUR to the KTx were treated with subureteral injections of Durasphere(®). The mean age at surgery was 38.8 ± 13.8 yr (23-65). The patients were followed regularly every six months. The mean interval between the KTx and the treatment was 76 ± 74.1 (10-238 months). The mean follow-up was 22.3 ± 16.1 months (8-57 months). RESULTS: Six patients (75%) were free of pyelonephritis during a mean period of follow-up of 23.2 ± 17.1 months (8-57 months). Two of them had no VUR and four cases presented with G II VUR (pre-operative G IV three cases and one case G III). In one case, symptomatic recurrent cystitis made a second treatment necessary. This patient remained free of infections for three yr after the first treatment and for 18 months after the second treatment. Of the remaining two patients, one had six episodes of RTP before treatment in a period of three yr and only two episodes after treatment in two yr of follow-up. The last case had a new episode of pyelonephritis five months after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Transurethral injection therapy with Durasphere(®) is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment option for KTx patients with recurrent RTP. A second treatment seems to be necessary in some cases.
Assuntos
Materiais Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Glucanos/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Pielonefrite/tratamento farmacológico , Prevenção Secundária , Refluxo Vesicoureteral/tratamento farmacológico , Zircônio/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intralesionais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Pielonefrite/etiologia , Refluxo Vesicoureteral/etiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Não é infreqüente ouvir que, em transplante renal, inovações de impacto no âmbito cirúrgico já não são mais prováveis. No entanto, soluções de alto impacto econômico ainda surgem com freqüência e muitas delas têm surgido no Brasil, contribuindo significativamente para a mudança de conduta cirúrgica em transplante renal a nível mundial. A técnica cirúrgica do transplante renal propriamente dita está bem estabelecida há anos, sendo muito parecida entre os diversos serviços de transplante. Já no que se refere ao tratamento cirúrgico das complicações do transplante e dos pacientes com doenças associadas à insuficiência renal crônica dialítica (IRCD), observamos considerável controvérsia e variação nas condutas. Este estudo pretende oferecer um panorama sobre as técnicas cirúrgicas utilizadas no transplante renal, as complicações decorrentes deste procedimento e os resultados obtidos pelo Serviço de Transplante Renal do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo...
Is not rare to hear that, on kidney transplantation, improvements on surgical aspects are not probable anymore. Although, solutions with high economical impact arises frequently and, many of them, in Brazil, contributing, significantly, for changes on surgical conduct on kidney transplantation worldwide. The surgical techniques for kidney transplantation are well established and do not change between the groups of transplants. Although, the surgical treatment of complicated outcomes and of patients with diseases related to chronic renal failure is still controversial. This study aims to offer a general overview about the surgical techniques of kidney transplantation, complications inherent to this procedure and the results obtained by the Kidney Transplantation Team of Clinic Hospital of São Paulo University Medical School.
Assuntos
Hospitais de Ensino , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Transplante de Rim , Unidade Hospitalar de UrologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Living donor nephrectomy is usually performed by a retroperitoneal flank incision. Due to the significant morbidity and long recovery time for a flank incision, anterior extra peritoneal sub-costal and transperitoneal video-laparoscopic methods have been described for donor nephrectomy. We prospectively compare the long-term results of donors as well as functional recipients submitted to these three approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 live donor renal transplantations were prospectively evaluated from May 2001 to January 2004. Donors were compared with regard to operative and warm ischemia time, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and complications. Recipients were compared with regard to graft function, acute cellular rejection, surgical complications, and graft and recipient survival. RESULTS: The mean operative and warm ischemia times were longer in the video-laparoscopic group (p<0.001), whereas patients of the flank incision group presented more postoperative pain (p=0.035), required more analgesics (p<0.001), had longer hospital stays (p<0.001), and suffered more pain on the 90th day after surgery (p=0.006). In the sub-costal and flank incision groups, there was a larger number of paraesthesias and abdominal wall asymmetries (p<0.001). Recipient groups were demographically comparable and presented similar acute tubular necrosis incidence and delayed graft function. The incidence of acute cellular rejection was higher in the video-laparoscopic and flank incision groups (p=0.013). There was no difference in serum creatinine levels, surgical complications, or recipient or graft survival between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The video-laparoscopic and sub-costal approaches proved to be safe, and to provide donor advantages relative to the flank incision approach. Among recipients, the complication rate, graft survival, and recipient survival were similar in all groups.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim/métodos , Doadores Vivos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Adulto , Creatinina/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Laparoscopia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Dor Pós-Operatória , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Living donor nephrectomy is usually performed by a retroperitoneal flank incision. Due to the significant morbidity and long recovery time for a flank incision, anterior extra peritoneal sub-costal and transperitoneal video-laparoscopic methods have been described for donor nephrectomy. We prospectively compare the long-term results of donors as well as functional recipients submitted to these three approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 live donor renal transplantations were prospectively evaluated from May 2001 to January 2004. Donors were compared with regard to operative and warm ischemia time, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and complications. Recipients were compared with regard to graft function, acute cellular rejection, surgical complications, and graft and recipient survival. RESULTS: The mean operative and warm ischemia times were longer in the video-laparoscopic group (p<0.001), whereas patients of the flank incision group presented more postoperative pain (p=0.035), required more analgesics (p<0.001), had longer hospital stays (p<0.001), and suffered more pain on the 90th day after surgery (p=0.006). In the sub-costal and flank incision groups, there was a larger number of paraesthesias and abdominal wall asymmetries (p<0.001). Recipient groups were demographically comparable and presented similar acute tubular necrosis incidence and delayed graft function. The incidence of acute cellular rejection was higher in the video-laparoscopic and flank incision groups (p=0.013). There was no difference in serum creatinine levels, surgical complications, or recipient or graft survival between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The video-laparoscopic and sub-costal approaches proved to be safe, and to provide donor advantages relative to the flank incision approach. Among recipients, the complication rate, graft survival, and recipient survival were similar in all groups.