Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 19(1): e0294725, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38227588

RESUMO

AIM: To gather available scientific evidence on technologies used to teach hand hygiene to professional populations and lays involved in health care in the hospital setting. This systematic review was designed as proposed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, included studies reporting primary, original, quantitative research findings with no date limit and written in English, Spanish or Portuguese. The search was performed in the following electronic databases: Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Excerpta Medica dataBASE, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, US National Library of Medicine, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and ProQuest. The eligibility criteria were applied independently by two reviewers to select the studies, first by reading the titles and abstracts on the Rayyan platform and then by full text reading of the eligible studies. After a descriptive analysis, the studies were subjected to critical evaluation of their methodological quality using JBI tools. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, addressing various methods for teaching hand hygiene using different technological resources, such as audiovisual electronic devices, videos, virtual reality, and gamification using tablets and smartphones, in different populations. CONCLUSION: Using technologies to teach hand hygiene considerably helps patients, visitors, and relatives in learning the procedures and efficiently improves hand hygiene compliance rates among healthcare professionals, creating evidence-based repetitive learning opportunities for patients and caregivers.


Assuntos
Higiene das Mãos , Humanos , Pessoal de Saúde , Aprendizagem , Tecnologia Educacional
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 50(10): 1091-1097, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35150804

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the tolerance and acceptability of alcohol-based surgical hand preparation versus handscrubbing with antimicrobial soap and water by surgeons. METHODS: Matched quasi-experimental trial in an academic quaternary care hospital in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil, from April 1 to October, 31, 2017. Participants were cardiac and orthopedics surgeons from the study facility. In the first study phase, they performed handscrubbing with either 2% chlorhexidine (CHG) or 10% iodopovidone (PVP-I) and, in the second phase, they performed handrubbing with alcohol-based handrub (ABHR). Surgeons' skin tolerance and acceptability were evaluated using WHO-validated tools. Data were analyzed using the MacNemar's test within STATA. RESULTS: A total of 33 surgeons participated to the "per protocol" population; the majority were male (94%); mean age of 35 years (SD, 8.5). On product tolerance, there was a minimal variation in redness, scaliness, fissures, and visual evaluation of the skin when handrubbing with ABHR was compared to handscrubbing with either PVP-I or CHX. Regarding acceptability, participants rated better handrubbing with ABHR than handscrubbing with PVP-I when assessing product smell (66.6% vs 0%, p=0.002), color (73.3% vs 0%, p=0.001), product texture (60% vs 0%, p=0.004), skin dryness (60% vs 0%, p=0.004), ease of application (66.6% vs 0%, p=0.002) and overall satisfaction (66.6% vs 6.7% p=0.011). Participants rated similarly handrubbing with ABHR and handscrubbing with CHX, except for product texture, where handrubbing rated better (71,4% vs. 0%, p=0.002). Handrubbing with ABHR was preferred by 73.3%. CONCLUSION: Although handrubbing and handscrubbing were equally well tolerated by surgeons, alcohol-based surgical hand preparation fell into the personal preference for most of them. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC), RBR-8ym9yj.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais , Anti-Infecciosos , Cirurgiões , Adulto , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Clorexidina , Etanol , Feminino , Mãos , Desinfecção das Mãos , Humanos , Masculino , Povidona-Iodo , Sabões , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Água
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31285821

RESUMO

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) ethanol-based handrub (EBHR) formulation contains 1.45% glycerol as an emollient to protect healthcare workers' (HCWs) skin against dryness and dermatitis. However, glycerol seems to negatively affect the antimicrobial efficacy of alcohols. In addition, the minimal concentration of glycerol required to protect hands remain unknown. We aim to evaluate the tolerance of HCWs to the WHO EBHR formulation using different concentrations of glycerol in a tropical climate healthcare setting. Methods: We conducted a cluster-randomized, double-blind, crossover study among 40 HCWs from an intensive care unit of a tertiary-care hospital in Brazil, from June 1st to September 30, 2017. We tested the WHO EBHR original formulation containing 1.45% glycerol against three other concentrations (0, 0.5, and 0.75%). HCWs used one formulation at a time for seven working days during their routine practice and then had their hands evaluated by an external observer using the WHO scale for visual inspection. Participants also used a WHO self-evaluation tool to rate their own skin condition. We used a generalized estimating equations of the logit type to compare differences between the tolerability to different formulations. Results: According to the independent observation, participants had 2.4 times (95%CI: 1.12-5.15) more chance of having a skin condition considered good when they used the 0.5% compared to the 1.45% glycerol formulation. For the self-evaluation scale, participants were likely to have a worst evaluation (OR: 0.23, 95%CI: 0.11-0.49) when they used the preparation without glycerol compared to the WHO standard formulation (1.45%), and there were no differences between the other formulations used. Conclusion: In a tropical climate setting, the WHO-modified EBHR formulation containing 0.5% glycerol led to better ratings of skin tolerance than the original formulation, and, therefore, may offer the best balance between skin tolerance and antimicrobial efficacy.


Assuntos
Etanol/efeitos adversos , Glicerol/análise , Desinfecção das Mãos/métodos , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Etanol/química , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Atenção Terciária à Saúde , Clima Tropical , Organização Mundial da Saúde
4.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 8(1): 206, 2019 12 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32005230

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Harmonization in hand hygiene training for infection prevention and control (IPC) professionals is lacking. We describe a standardized approach to training, using a "Train-the-Trainers" (TTT) concept for IPC professionals and assess its impact on hand hygiene knowledge in six countries. METHODS: We developed a three-day simulation-based TTT course based on the World Health Organization (WHO) Multimodal Hand Hygiene Improvement Strategy. To evaluate its impact, we have performed a pre-and post-course knowledge questionnaire. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the results before and after training. RESULTS: Between June 2016 and January 2018 we conducted seven TTT courses in six countries: Iran, Malaysia, Mexico, South Africa, Spain and Thailand. A total of 305 IPC professionals completed the programme. Participants included nurses (n = 196; 64.2%), physicians (n = 53; 17.3%) and other health professionals (n = 56; 18.3%). In total, participants from more than 20 countries were trained. A significant (p < 0.05) improvement in knowledge between the pre- and post-TTT training phases was observed in all countries. Puebla (Mexico) had the highest improvement (22.3%; p < 0.001), followed by Malaysia (21.2%; p < 0.001), Jalisco (Mexico; 20.2%; p < 0.001), Thailand (18.8%; p < 0.001), South Africa (18.3%; p < 0.001), Iran (17.5%; p < 0.001) and Spain (9.7%; p = 0.047). Spain had the highest overall test scores, while Thailand had the lowest pre- and post-scores. Positive aspects reported included: unique learning environment, sharing experiences, hands-on practices on a secure environment and networking among IPC professionals. Sustainability was assessed through follow-up evaluations conducted in three original TTT course sites in Mexico (Jalisco and Puebla) and in Spain: improvement was sustained in the last follow-up phase when assessed 5 months, 1 year and 2 years after the first TTT course, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The TTT in hand hygiene model proved to be effective in enhancing participant's knowledge, sharing experiences and networking. IPC professionals can use this reference training method worldwide to further disseminate knowledge to other health care workers.


Assuntos
Educação , Higiene das Mãos/métodos , Higiene das Mãos/normas , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Infecções , Irã (Geográfico) , Malásia , México , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Médicos , Treinamento por Simulação , África do Sul , Espanha , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tailândia , Organização Mundial da Saúde
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 39(8): 633-639, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21636170

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is an effective strategy for the prevention of health care-associated infection (HAI). We investigated the effect of a hand hygiene promotion strategy introducing alcohol-based handrub (AHBR) on the incidence of HAI in a university hospital in Colombia. METHODS: A Prospective cohort study was performed in 6 intensive care units from January 2001 to December 2005. HAI were identified using standard US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. Alcohol-based handrub dispensers were installed between February and June 2002. RESULTS: Total ABHR consumption was 5,794 L (mean, 28.9 L per 1,000 patient-days) and significantly increased over time (+9.2% per year; P < .001). Of 14,516 patients cumulating 166,498 patient-days, 2,398 (16.5%) acquired a total of 3,490 HAI episodes (20.9 per 1,000 patient-days). Incidence densities for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), ventilator-associated pneumonia, and urinary tract infections were 7.7, 10.6, and 3.6 episodes per 1,000 device-days, respectively. A significant decrease was observed for CLABSI (-12.7% per year; P < .001) with low nurse-to-patient ratio independently associated with infection (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.16; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Improved hand hygiene measured by increased ABHR consumption resulted in CLABSI reduction. Low nurse-to-patient ratio is independently associated with HAI in an upper-middle income country.


Assuntos
Álcoois/administração & dosagem , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Desinfecção das Mãos/métodos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Etanol/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Desinfecção das Mãos/normas , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Higiene/normas , Incidência , Lactente , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA