RESUMO
Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) relies on a sputum sample, which cannot be obtained from all symptomatic individuals. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transrenal DNA (trDNA) has been detected in urine, an easily obtainable, noninvasive, alternative sample type. However, reported sensitivities have been variable and likely depend on collection and assay procedures and aspects of trDNA biology. We analyzed three serial urine samples from each of 75 adults with culture-confirmed pulmonary TB disease in Lima, Peru for detection of trDNA using short-fragment real-time PCR. Additionally, we examined host, urine, and sampling factors associated with detection. Overall per-sample sensitivity was 38 % (95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 30-45 %). On an individual level (i.e., any of the three samples positive), sensitivity was 73 % (95 % CI: 62-83 %). Sensitivity was highest among samples from patients with smear-positive TB, 92 % (95 % CI: 62-100 %). Specificity from a single sample from each of 10 healthy controls was 100 % (95 % CI: 69-100 %). Adjusting our assay positivity threshold increased individual-level sensitivity to 88 % (95 % CI: 78-94 %) overall without affecting the specificity. We did not find associations between Mtb trDNA detection and individual characteristics or urine sample characteristics. Overall, our results support the potential of trDNA detection for TB diagnosis.
Assuntos
DNA Bacteriano , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculose Pulmonar , Humanos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Feminino , Peru/epidemiologia , Masculino , DNA Bacteriano/urina , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Tuberculose Pulmonar/urina , Tuberculose Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Tuberculose Pulmonar/microbiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Urinálise/métodos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , IdosoRESUMO
Diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) relies on a sputum sample, which cannot be obtained from all symptomatic patients. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transrenal DNA (trDNA) has been detected in urine, an easily obtainable, noninvasive, alternative sample type. However, reported sensitivities have been variable and likely depend on collection/assay procedures and aspects of trDNA biology. We analyzed three serial urine samples from each of 75 adults with culture-confirmed pulmonary TB disease in Lima, Peru for detection of trDNA using short-fragment real-time PCR. Additionally, we examined host, urine, and sampling factors associated with detection. Overall sample sensitivity was 38% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 30-45%). On a patient level (i.e., any of three samples positive), sensitivity was 73% (95% CI: 62-83%). Sensitivity was highest among samples from patients with smear-positive TB, 92% (95% CI: 62-100%). Specificity from a single sample from each of 10 healthy controls was 100% (95% CI: 69-100%). Adjusting our assay positivity threshold increased patient-level sensitivity to 88% (95% CI: 78-94%) overall without affecting the specificity. We did not find associations between Mtb trDNA detection and either patient characteristics or urine sample characteristics. Overall, our results support the potential of trDNA detection for TB diagnosis.
RESUMO
Tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis relies on a sputum sample, which cannot be easily obtained from all symptomatic patients. Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA can be detected from oral swabs, a noninvasive, safe alternative sample type; however, reported sensitivities have been variable and likely depend on sample collection, processing procedures and host characteristics. We analyzed three buccal swab samples from 123 adults with culture-confirmed TB in Lima, Peru. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of two sample collection devices (OmniSwab and EasiCollect FTA cards) and examined factors associated with detection. DNA was extracted with a commercially available kit and detected via real-time PCR IS6110 amplification. Overall sensitivity for buccal samples was 51% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 42-60%). Specificity from a single sample among healthy controls was 96.7% (95% CI 83-99.9%). Positive sputum smear and cavitary disease, correlates of disease burden, were associated with detection via buccal swab. Although we observed higher sensitivities with the Omniswab samples, this appeared to be due primarily to differences in patient characteristics (e.g., cavitary disease). Overall, our findings support the potential for a buccal sample-based TB assay. Future work should focus on assay optimization and streamlining the assay workflow.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Mucosa Bucal/microbiologia , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Tuberculose/microbiologia , Adulto , Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Peru , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Escarro/microbiologia , Tuberculose/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose Pulmonar/microbiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
We examined Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection from buccal swab samples collected from children in Lima, Peru. DNA was extracted and amplified via real-time polymerase chain reaction. Sensitivity was 21% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7%-42%) in 24 culture-confirmed tuberculosis cases and 4.6% (95% CI: 1%-13%) in 65 clinically diagnosed unconfirmed cases. Sensitivity was highest for smear-positive tuberculosis. Specificity was 99% in the 199 controls (95% CI: 96%-100%).
Assuntos
DNA Bacteriano/análise , Mucosa Bucal/microbiologia , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , PeruRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rapid and accurate diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis (TB) is challenging because children are often unable to produce the sputum sample required for conventional tests. Stool is an alternative sample type that is easy to collect from children, and studies investigating the use of stool for molecular detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) have led to promising results. Our objective was to evaluate stool as an alternative specimen to sputum for Mtb detection in children. We did so using the TruTip workstation (Akonni Biosystems), a novel automated lysis and extraction platform. METHODS: We tested stool samples from 259 children aged 0-14 years old, in Lima, Peru who presented with TB symptoms. Following extraction with TruTip, we detected the presence of Mtb DNA by IS6110 real-time PCR. We calculated assay sensitivity in two groups: (1) children with culture confirmed TB (N = 22); and (2) children with clinically-diagnosed unconfirmed TB (N = 84). We calculated specificity among children in whom TB was ruled out (N = 153). Among children who were diagnosed with TB, we examined factors associated with a positive stool test. RESULTS: Assay sensitivity was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39-80%) and 1.2% (95% CI: 0.0-6.5%) in children with culture-confirmed and clinically-diagnosed unconfirmed TB, respectively, and specificity was 97% (95% CI: 93-99%). The assay detected Mtb in stool of 7/7 children with smear-positive TB (100% sensitivity; 95% CI: 59-100%), and in 6/15 of children with smear-negative, culture-confirmed TB (40% sensitivity; 95% CI: 16-68%). Older age, smear positivity, culture positivity, ability to produce sputum and cavitary disease were associated with a positive stool result. CONCLUSION: Testing of stool samples with the TruTip workstation and IS6110 amplification yielded sensitivity and specificity estimates comparable to other tests such as Xpert. Future work should include detection of resistance using the TruTip closed amplification system and assay optimization to improve sensitivity in children with low bacillary loads.