RESUMO
Background: Needle stick injury is one of the greatest work-related health hazard, that registered nurses encounter on an everyday basis for example the risk of being exposed to dangerous and deadly blood borne pathogens through contaminated needle sticks such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis viruses. New registered nurses' lacking knowledge and skills regarding standard precautions are exposed to needle stick injuries from unsafe practices such as recapping of needles, manipulating used needles such as bending, breaking or cutting hypodermic needles and passing needles from one nurse to another (American Nurses Association 2002). Methods: This was a quantitative descriptive study. The dependent variable was the needle stick injury and the independent variables consisted of factors which influenced the occurrence of needle stick injuries among new registered nurses. The factors are practice, knowledge, resources and attitudes. The population was new registered nurses with less than three years' experience at the San Fernando General Hospital. A total of 120 new registered nurses were employed during the period under review and the entire population was used as the sample. A 26 item instrument was used to collect data which were analyzed using SPSS version 20. Findings: Most of the respondents 59 (49.2%) were between the ages 20-<30 years and 88 (73.4%) were female. The most common years' experience was 53 (44.2%). Almost half 54 (45%) respondents had experienced a needle stick injury with the most common exposure being while in use (17.5%) and recapping needles (215%). A total of 49 (40.8%) respondents had at least one to less than 3 needle sticks since employment and this was most common among staff on the medical wards. There was a moderate correlation between respondents knowledge about institution's policies and need for training (r0.409, p0.01) and strong correlation between their perception of the need to be more vigilant and the quality of the sharps that they are provided with (r0.913, p0.01). Conclusion: Avoidable practices such as non-adherence to standard precautions while using hypodermic needles are contributing factors to needle stick injuries. Prevention of NSI's should be an integral part of occupational health programs in the work place. Therefore, mandatory training and evaluation of health care worker's, knowledge and attitude regarding safety practices and proper use of available resources should be enforced when carrying out their duties in the clinical area.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ferimentos Penetrantes Produzidos por Agulha , Trinidad e Tobago , Região do Caribe , Enfermeiras e EnfermeirosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the attitude towards voluntary non-remunerated blood donation among blood donors in Trinidad and Tobago (TRT). BACKGROUND: Blood donors in TRT are either family replacement (F/R, 87%) or remunerated (13%). There is chronic blood shortage and high seroreactivity for transfusion-transmissible infections (TTI) in donors. Converting existing to voluntary non-remunerated donors (VNRD) reduces the need to recruit news donors in achieving 100% VNRD. METHODS: A questionnaire-based, cross-sectional survey was conducted at two blood collection centres at an interval of 8 years. Donors were surveyed for sociodemographic characteristics, awareness of the blood shortage, previous donation behaviour, donor-beneficiary linkage if F/R, willingness to become VNRD and choice of motivators for converting to VNRD. RESULTS: A total of 400 and 595 donors respectively participated in Surveys 1 and 2, of whom 92·8 and 86·3% were F/R (P < 0·001), respectively. In both surveys, 52% of participants were unaware of an existing blood shortage (P = 0·983). Only 9·8 and 9·1% of participants expressed unwillingness to become VNRD (P = 0·720). The main motivators to convert to VNRD were reminders from the centre (84%) and extended opening hours (78%) in Survey 1 as compared to confidence that donated blood was used properly (73%) and shortened waiting times to donate (73%) in Survey 2. CONCLUSION: Despite low awareness of blood shortage, willingness to become VNRD was high among existing donors. Accountability and donor convenience underpinned the main motivators for converting to VNRD.