RESUMO

Background: Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is a recognized threat to public health that undermines efforts to mitigate disease burden. This study aims to gather available evidence regarding COVID-19 VH in Mexico, estimate the prevalence of VH, and its determinants to inform policymaking in this country. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the MEDLINE literature, articles that estimated the prevalence of COVID-19 VH in Mexico were included in the analysis to obtain a pooled estimate. We used a binomial-normal model for meta-analysis of proportions (i.e., generalized linear mixed model) to perform the metanalysis. We then performed a narrative review of COVID-19 VH in Mexican subpopulations. Results: Seven studies met inclusion criteria. We estimated a pooled prevalence of COVID-19 VH of 16 % (95 % CI: 11-23 %) in Mexico. We found an association between VH and demographic characteristics, intrinsic vaccine factors, and beliefs. Subgroup analyses from specific studies suggested that patients with clinical conditions such as breast cancer or rheumatologic diseases had a higher prevalence of VH. Conclusions: VH is a highly complex and dynamic phenomenon in Mexico. Characterizing and understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the Mexican population helps target future policy interventions to mitigate the spread and impact of infectious diseases. The implications of VH differ among groups that may be at higher risk of severe disease, underscoring the importance of prompt research among these groups as well as targeted interventions to address VH.

RESUMO

Introduction: Teenage pregnancy is defined as a pregnancy occurring between ages 10 and 19 (Loredo-Abdlá et al., 2017; Belitzky, 1985; Kaplanoglu et al., 2015), and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality for both mother and child. Several factors have been identified with increased risk of a teenage pregnancy, including incomplete sexual education awareness and increased exposure at a young age. In addition, an earlier onset of sexual intercourse, or coitarche, has been linked to a higher risk of teenage pregnancy. Early menarche, defined as first menstruation before the age of 12 has been previously identified as a risk factor for an earlier coitarche, possibly linking an early menarche with a higher incidence of teenage pregnancy. This study aims to compare and determine the relationship between the incidence of teenage pregnancy with early menarche and coitarche in a low income setting. Design Setting Participants Interventions Main Outcome Measures: A cross sectional review of electronic records of women admitted for delivery in a second level center in northeastern Mexico, being a low-income setting, where 814 teenage and 1474 adult mothers were included. Results: Primigravid teenagers had earlier menarche and coitarche than adult counterparts and opted for postpartum contraception more frequently. Linear regression analysis revealed significant unadjusted beta coefficients between age at first pregnancy and coitarche (0.839) and menarche (0.362). Menarche and coitarche had a significant linear regression association of 0.395. Conclusion: We found amongst primigravid patients that teenagers had earlier menarche and coitarche than adults, which in turn correlated to their age at their first pregnancy.

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: The objective of the study is to validate the use of the Killip-Kimball classification (KC) as a predictor of outcomes in an octogenarian cohort with acute coronary syndrome. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent a catheterization procedure for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was performed. ACS was defined as per the American Heart Association guidelines, and included ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI and Unstable Angina. We determined factors associated with the KC upon admission to the emergency room. Likewise, we compared in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and other outcomes dividing the patients by KC. Results: A total of 133 patients with a mean age of 83 years were analyzed and assigned a KC from 1 to 4 according to clinical presentation. Each group included 86, 9, 23, and 15 patients, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 12%, 5% in KC-I, 11% in KC-II, 22% in KC-III, and 40% in KC-IV with a significant difference between classes (p = 0.002). In addition, we found higher KC groups to be associated with acute kidney injury during the hospitalization (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Despite a strong reduction in mortality for elderly patients with ACS in recent decades, patients presenting with ACS and higher KC have a high mortality rate, as described in younger cohorts. KC remains a reliable prognostic tool, with applicability in octogenarian patients.

Resumen Objetivo: Validar el uso de la clasificación de Killip- Kimball como predictor de desenlaces en una cohorte de pacientes octogenarios con síndrome coronario agudo. Métodos: Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de pacientes sometidos a cateterismo por síndrome coronario agudo (ACS). Se incluyeron infarto al miocardio con y sin elevación del segment ST, así como angina inestable, utilizando las definiciones de la American Heart Association (AHA). Se determinaron los factores que influyeron en la clasificación de Killip-Kimball (KC) al momento de ingreso al hospital. Se comparó la mortalidad, la estancia intrahospitalaria y otros desenlaces, dividiendo a los pacientes por su KC. Resultados: Un total de 133 pacientes se incluyeron en el análisis y se clasificaron dependiendo de su KC (I-IV). Cada grupo incluyó 86, 9, 23 y 15 pacientes, respectivamente. La edad media fue de 83 años. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue de 5, 11, 22 y 40%, respectivamente para cada KC, y 12% global. Hubo una diferencia significativa en la mortalidad por clase (p = 0.002). Adicionalmente, se encontró que a mayor KC, mayor riesgo de lesión renal aguda durante la hospitalización (p < 0.01). Conclusión: A pesar de una reducción en la mortalidad de adultos mayores con ACS en décadas recients, pacientes con ACS y mayor KC tienen riesgo aumentado de morir, igual que pacientes en grupos de edad menores. La KC continñua siendo una herramienta confiable para la clasificación y con utilidad pronóstica, con aplicabilidad en pacientes mayores de 80 años.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery bypass graft is the mainstay of treatment for multivessel coronary artery disease and is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention. Combined approaches such as hybrid coronary revascularization integrate coronary artery bypass grafting with percutaneous coronary intervention during the same procedure or weeks apart. These attempt to improve surgical morbidity and long-term outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Per PRISMA criteria, a systematic review of keywords "Hybrid Revascularization," "Hybrid Coronary Revascularization," "Surgical," "Surgery," "Treatment," "CABG," "HCR" and "PCI" was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and SCOPUS. Studies comparing this technique's performance on either single or two-stage approach against traditional multiple vessel coronary artery bypass grafting were screened and analyzed for our review. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-two studies totaling 6981 participants were ultimately included for analysis. Mean differences in operative time, bleeding, ventilator time and length of stay were significantly lower in the hybrid coronary revascularization group. Odds ratios in transfusions and in-hospital myocardial infarction were also lower in the hybrid coronary revascularization group. Results for in-hospital and all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), stroke, reintervention, and complete revascularization were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis shows hybrid coronary revascularization is a feasible alternative to traditional coronary artery bypass grafting. Short-and long-term outcomes including mortality, MACE, and postoperative morbidity are similar between both groups, while hybrid approaches are associated with decreased perioperative morbidity.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objective: The objective of the study is to validate the use of the Killip-Kimball classification (KC) as a predictor of outcomes in an octogenarian cohort with acute coronary syndrome. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent a catheterization procedure for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was performed. ACS was defined as per the American Heart Association guidelines, and included ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI and Unstable Angina. We determined factors associated with the KC upon admission to the emergency room. Likewise, we compared in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and other outcomes dividing the patients by KC. Results: A total of 133 patients with a mean age of 83 years were analyzed and assigned a KC from 1 to 4 according to clinical presentation. Each group included 86, 9, 23, and 15 patients, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 12%, 5% in KC-I, 11% in KC-II, 22% in KC-III, and 40% in KC-IV with a significant difference between classes (p = 0.002). In addition, we found higher KC groups to be associated with acute kidney injury during the hospitalization (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Despite a strong reduction in mortality for elderly patients with ACS in recent decades, patients presenting with ACS and higher KC have a high mortality rate, as described in younger cohorts. KC remains a reliable prognostic tool, with applicability in octogenarian patients.

Objetivo: Validar el uso de la clasificación de Killip- Kimball como predictor de desenlaces en una cohorte de pacientes octogenarios con síndrome coronario agudo. Métodos: Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de pacientes sometidos a cateterismo por síndrome coronario agudo (ACS). Se incluyeron infarto al miocardio con y sin elevación del segment ST, así como angina inestable, utilizando las definiciones de la American Heart Association (AHA). Se determinaron los factores que influyeron en la clasificación de Killip-Kimball (KC) al momento de ingreso al hospital. Se comparó la mortalidad, la estancia intrahospitalaria y otros desenlaces, dividiendo a los pacientes por su KC. Resultados: Un total de 133 pacientes se incluyeron en el análisis y se clasificaron dependiendo de su KC (I-IV). Cada grupo incluyó 86, 9, 23 y 15 pacientes, respectivamente. La edad media fue de 83 años. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue de 5, 11, 22 y 40%, respectivamente para cada KC, y 12% global. Hubo una diferencia significativa en la mortalidad por clase (p = 0.002). Adicionalmente, se encontró que a mayor KC, mayor riesgo de lesión renal aguda durante la hospitalización (p < 0.01). Conclusión: A pesar de una reducción en la mortalidad de adultos mayores con ACS en décadas recients, pacientes con ACS y mayor KC tienen riesgo aumentado de morir, igual que pacientes en grupos de edad menores. La KC continñua siendo una herramienta confiable para la clasificación y con utilidad pronóstica, con aplicabilidad en pacientes mayores de 80 años.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance among the Mexican population. METHODS: In a web-based nationwide survey in early December 2020, respondents were inquired about their sociodemographic characteristics and their willingness to accept a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine given a 50% or 90% effectiveness. A logistic regression model was used to identify the factors associated with hesitancy and acceptance. RESULTS: A total 3 768 responses were analyzed. A 90% effective vaccine was accepted by 85% of respondents, while only 46% would accept being vaccinated with a 50% effective vaccine. In univariate analysis, each age group (40-49, 50-59, and ≥60) was strongly associated with vaccine hesitancy for a 90% effective vaccine (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.38, 0.63; OR 0.33, 95 CI 0.26, 0.41; and OR 0.28, 95 CI 0.21, 0.38, respectively) compared to the 18-39 age group. After multivariable adjustment, similar magnitudes of association were observed. Being female and higher socioeconomic status were also associated with higher vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine hesitancy represents a major public health problem in Mexico and is driven by multiple factors. Our study provides relevant insights for the development of effective policies and strategies to ensure widespread vaccination in Mexico.

RESUMO

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To identify factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance among the Mexican population. Methods. In a web-based nationwide survey in early December 2020, respondents were inquired about their sociodemographic characteristics and their willingness to accept a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine given a 50% or 90% effectiveness. A logistic regression model was used to identify the factors associated with hesitancy and acceptance. Results. A total 3 768 responses were analyzed. A 90% effective vaccine was accepted by 85% of respondents, while only 46% would accept being vaccinated with a 50% effective vaccine. In univariate analysis, each age group (40–49, 50–59, and ≥60) was strongly associated with vaccine hesitancy for a 90% effective vaccine (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.38, 0.63; OR 0.33, 95 CI 0.26, 0.41; and OR 0.28, 95 CI 0.21, 0.38, respectively) compared to the 18–39 age group. After multivariable adjustment, similar magnitudes of association were observed. Being female and higher socioeconomic status were also associated with higher vaccine hesitancy. Conclusions. Vaccine hesitancy represents a major public health problem in Mexico and is driven by multiple factors. Our study provides relevant insights for the development of effective policies and strategies to ensure widespread vaccination in Mexico.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Determinar los factores asociados a la aceptación y la reticencia frente a la vacunación contra la COVID-19 en la población mexicana. Métodos. En una encuesta basada en la web a escala nacional, realizada a principios de diciembre del 2020, se preguntó a las personas entrevistadas sobre sus características sociodemográficas y su disposición a aceptar una hipotética vacuna contra la COVID-19 si garantizase 50% o 90% de efectividad. Se empleó un modelo de regresión logística para determinar los factores asociados con la aceptación y la reticencia. Resultados. Se analizó un total de 3 768 respuestas. Una vacuna con 90% de efectividad fue aceptada por 85% de las personas entrevistadas, si bien solo 46% aceptaría una vacuna con 50% de efectividad. En el análisis con una variable, cada grupo etario (de 40 a 49, de 50 a 59 y más de 60) estuvo estrechamente relacionado con una reticencia a la vacunación de una vacuna con 90% de efectividad (OR 0,48, IC de 95% 0,38, 0,63; OR 0,33, IC de 95% 0,26, 0,41; y OR 0,28, IC de 95% 0,21, 0,38, respectivamente) en comparación con el grupo etario de 18 a 39 años. Tras el ajuste multivariante, se observaron magnitudes de asociación similares. También se asoció ser mujer y tener una mejor situación socioeconómica con una mayor reticencia a la vacunación. Conclusiones. La reticencia frente a la vacunación representa un importante problema de salud pública en México y está impulsada por diversos factores. Nuestro estudio ofrece observaciones pertinentes para la elaboración de políticas y estrategias eficaces que garanticen una vacunación generalizada en México.

[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Identificar os fatores associados a hesitação e aceitação em relação à vacina contra a COVID-19 na população mexicana. Métodos. Em uma pesquisa nacional via internet, no início de dezembro de 2020, os participantes foram questionados acerca de suas características sociodemográficas e sua disposição de aceitar uma vacina hipotética contra a COVID-19, com eficácia de 50% ou 90%. Foi utilizado um modelo de regressão logística para identificar os fatores associados à hesitação e à aceitação. Resultados. Foi analisado um total de 3.768 respostas. Uma vacina com eficácia de 90% seria aceita por 85% dos participantes, enquanto uma vacina com eficácia de 50% seria aceita por somente 46%. Na análise univariada, cada faixa etária (40-49, 50-59, e ≥60) apresentou forte associação com hesitação em relação a uma vacina com eficácia de 90% (OR 0,48, IC de 95% 0,38, 0,63; OR 0,33, IC 95% 0,26, 0,41; e OR 0,28, IC 95% 0,21, 0,38, respectivamente), em comparação com a faixa etária de 18-39 anos. Após ajuste na análise multivariada, magnitudes semelhantes de associação foram observadas. Ser do sexo feminino e de faixa socioeconômica de renda mais alta também mostrou associação com maior hesitação em relação à vacina. Conclusões. A hesitação em relação à vacina representa um grande problema de saúde pública no México, e é impulsionada por múltiplos fatores. Nosso estudo traz informações relevantes para o desenvolvimento de políticas e estratégias efetivas para assegurar ampla vacinação no México.

Assuntos