RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Access to comprehensive abortion care could prevent the death of between 13 865 and 38 940 women and the associated morbidity of 5 million women worldwide. There have been some important improvements in Latin America in terms of laws and policies on abortion. However, the predominant environment is still restrictive, and many women, adolescents and girls still face multiple barriers to exercise their reproductive rights. This research will systematically assess comprehensive abortion policies in five Latin American countries (Argentina, Colombia, Honduras, Mexico and Uruguay). The aim is to identify barriers, facilitators and strategies to the implementation of abortion policies, looking at four key dimensions-regulatory framework, abortion policy dynamics, abortion service delivery and health system and health outcomes indicators-to draw cross-cutting lessons learnt to improve current implementation and inform future safe abortion policy development. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-method design will be used in the five countries to address the four dimensions through the Availability, Accessibility, Acceptability and Quality of Care model. The data collection tools include desk reviews and semi-structured interviews with key actors. Analysis will be performed using thematic analysis and stakeholder analysis. A regional synthesis exercise will be conducted to draw lessons on barriers, facilitators and the strategies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project has been approved by the WHO Research Ethics Review Committee (ID: A66023) and by the local research ethics committees. Informed consent will be obtained from participants. Data will be treated with careful attention to protecting privacy and confidentiality. Findings from the study will be disseminated through a multipurpose strategy to target diverse audiences to foster the use of the study findings to inform the public debate agenda and policy implementation at national level. The strategy will include academic, advocacy and policy arenas and actors, including peer-reviewed publication and national and regional dissemination workshops.
Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Gravidez , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , América Latina , México , Formulação de Políticas , PolíticasRESUMO
In December of 2020, the Argentine Congress legalized abortion through 14 weeks, vastly increasing access to abortion care in the country. The law's passage followed years of advocacy for abortion rights in Argentina - including mass public and civil society mobilization, vocal support from an established pool of abortion providers who offered abortion services under specific legal exceptions prior to the new law, and the growth of community groups such as the Socorristas en Red who provide support for people to self-manage abortions. Aided by ample political will, the number of health facilities offering services increased substantially after the law was passed, and the public visibility around the law has helped assure people seeking abortion that it is their right. Proyecto mirar is an initiative focused on both gathering and using qualitative and quantitative data to inform stakeholders about the progress and obstacles of the law's implementation. In this review, we present an overall summary of the first two years of implementation of the abortion law in Argentina based on proyecto mirar data and contextualized through the historical processes that have contributed to the law's passage and application. While we see increases in abortion services and improved public perception around abortion rights, inequities in access and quality of care persist throughout the country. Specifically, providers in some regions are well trained, while others create obstacles to access, and in some regions health services provide high quality abortion care whereas others provide substandard care. To be sure, the implementation of public policies does not happen overnight; it requires government support and backing to tackle obstacles and solve implementation problems. Our findings suggest that when new abortion laws are passed, they must be supported by civil society and government leaders to ensure that associated policies are well crafted and monitored to ensure successful implementation.
RESUMO
El objetivo es presentar una descripción general de las diferentes estrategias normativas para la autorización de la prescripción, el uso y la dispensa de medicamentos por parte de obstétricas. Para ello, se ofrece un breve panorama de las recomendaciones de organismos de rectoría sanitaria y profesional para ese fin, así como de las regulaciones de diferentes países del mundo. Además, se presenta un análisis comparado de las regulaciones existentes en la Argentina, enfocando en las estrategias regulatorias y, en particular, la revisión de los vademécums obstétricos vigentes. Ello, con el fin de aportar argumentos y observaciones sobre su alcance, estructura y contenido, y para indicar las fortalezas y desafíos que cada una de estas estrategias de regulación comporta. Finalmente, aportamos algunas breves recomendaciones para la formulación de una regulación nacional y de un vademécum obstétrico nacional en el marco de la aprobación de alguno de los proyectos de ley nacional de regulación de las competencias profesionales de la obstetricia que cursan en el Congreso de la Nación actualmente.
Assuntos
Preparações Farmacêuticas/provisão & distribuição , Obstetrícia/organização & administração , Argentina , PrescriçõesRESUMO
In recent decades, decisive events shaping the political and social context surrounding abortion in Argentina culminated in the passing of the Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy (IVE in Spanish) Law in December 2020. The objective of this article is to explore the main barriers to accessing legal abortions in the public health system faced by women during 2019 and 2020 in two Argentine jurisdictions, Rosario and the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires. Based on an adaptation of the "three phases of delay" framework, surveys and semi-structured interviews with 117 women were conducted. Study participants reported difficulties in accessing information about the places and people to turn to for abortions, and most stated that pregnant individuals lack information regarding their legality. Although the majority of interviewees reported positive experiences with health services, they also identified some administrative and institutional barriers.
En las últimas décadas, en la Argentina sucedieron hechos determinantes en el contexto político y social con respecto al aborto, que culminaron con la aprobación de la Ley de Interrupción Voluntaria del Embarazo (IVE) en diciembre de 2020. El objetivo de este artículo es explorar las principales barreras que enfrentaron las mujeres en el acceso al aborto legal en el sistema público de salud de dos jurisdicciones de Argentina, Rosario y Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, en los años 2019 y 2020. A partir de una adaptación del modelo de las tres demoras, se realizaron encuestas y entrevistas semiestructuradas a 117 mujeres. Las participantes reportaron dificultades para acceder a información sobre lugares y personas donde recurrir para acceder un aborto. La mayoría de las participantes respondió que las personas gestantes no cuentan con información sobre la legalidad del aborto. Si bien la mayoría reportó haber tenido una buena experiencia con los servicios de salud, también identificaron algunas barreras administrativas e institucionales.
Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Aborto Legal , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Cidades , Saúde Pública , ArgentinaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To explore obstetricians', midwives' and trainees' perceptions of caesarean section (CS) determinants in the context of public obstetric care services provision in Argentina. Our hypothesis is that known determinants of CS use may differ in settings with limited access to essential obstetric services. SETTING: We conducted a formative research study in 19 public maternity hospitals in Argentina. An institutional survey assessed the availability of essential obstetric services. Subsequently, we conducted online surveys and semistructured interviews to assess the opinions of providers on known CS determinants. RESULTS: Obstetric services showed an adequate provision of emergency obstetric care but limited services to support women during birth. Midwives, with some exceptions, are not involved during labour. We received 680 surveys from obstetricians, residents and midwives (response rate of 63%) and interviewed 26 key informants. Six out of 10 providers (411, 61%) indicated that the use of CS is associated with the complexities of our caseload. Limited pain management access was deemed a potential contributing factor for CS in adolescents and first-time mothers. Providers have conflicting views on the adequacy of training to deal with complex or prolonged labour. Obstetricians with more than 10 years of clinical experience indicated that fear of litigation was also associated with CS. Overall, there is consensus on the need to implement interventions to reduce unnecessary CS. CONCLUSIONS: Public maternity hospitals in Argentina have made significant improvements in the provision of emergency services. The environment of service provision does not seem to facilitate the physiological process of vaginal birth. Providers acknowledged some of these challenges.
Assuntos
Trabalho de Parto , Tocologia , Adolescente , Argentina , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Cesárea , Feminino , Humanos , Parto , GravidezRESUMO
RESUMEN En las últimas décadas, en la Argentina sucedieron hechos determinantes en el contexto político y social con respecto al aborto, que culminaron con la aprobación de la Ley de Interrupción Voluntaria del Embarazo (IVE) en diciembre de 2020. El objetivo de este artículo es explorar las principales barreras que enfrentaron las mujeres en el acceso al aborto legal en el sistema público de salud de dos jurisdicciones de Argentina, Rosario y Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, en los años 2019 y 2020. A partir de una adaptación del modelo de las tres demoras, se realizaron encuestas y entrevistas semiestructuradas a 117 mujeres. Las participantes reportaron dificultades para acceder a información sobre lugares y personas donde recurrir para acceder un aborto. La mayoría de las participantes respondió que las personas gestantes no cuentan con información sobre la legalidad del aborto. Si bien la mayoría reportó haber tenido una buena experiencia con los servicios de salud, también identificaron algunas barreras administrativas e institucionales.
ABSTRACT In recent decades, decisive events shaping the political and social context surrounding abortion in Argentina culminated in the passing of the Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy (IVE in Spanish) Law in December 2020. The objective of this article is to explore the main barriers to accessing legal abortions in the public health system faced by women during 2019 and 2020 in two Argentine jurisdictions: Rosario and the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires. Based on an adaptation of the "three phases of delay" framework, surveys and semi-structured interviews with 117 women were conducted. Study participants reported difficulties in accessing information about the places and people to turn to for abortions, and most stated that pregnant individuals lack information regarding their legality. Although the majority of interviewees reported positive experiences with health services, they also identified some administrative and institutional barriers.
RESUMO
Este nuevo reporte del proyecto mirar aborda la calidad en la provisión de servicios de aborto. Su objetivo es contribuir a poner en agenda una dimensión crítica de la política de abor- to a la luz de los estándares internacionales y de la propia Ley 27.610.1 También este reporte tiene la intención de dar cuenta a través de las voces de decisores, abogadas, proveedores y activistas de distintas provincias de Argentina- de la situación actual en materia de calidad de servicios de aborto e identificar tareas pendientes a dos años de sancionada la ley.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Aborto Legal , Política de Saúde , Aborto , Legislação como AssuntoRESUMO
El estudio describe empíricamente las maneras en que los medios escritos abordaron el tema del aborto en 2018, en el 2020 y en el 2021
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Argentina , Aborto Legal , Meios de Comunicação de MassaRESUMO
Este documento reúne los resultados de un estudio de revisión documental de los planes de estudio y programas de asignaturas vinculadas a la salud sexual y reproductiva de las Licenciaturas en Obstetricia que se dictan en universidades públicas y privadas de la Argentina. Forma parte de la serie "El trabajo obstétrico en la salud sexual y reproductiva" que el CEDES desarrolla con la colaboración de Ipas como contribución a un mejor conocimiento de este colectivo profesional. En esta serie se han publicado los documentos: "Fortalecimiento de las competencias y funciones de la Obstétricas/os en la Argentina: un tema estratégico" (Ariza S, Sciurano G, Ramos S, 2022) y "Voces de Obstétricas de Argentina: entre disputas, experiencias, saberes y pasiones" (Zurbriggen y Ramos, 2022). El documento que se presenta se enmarca en la estrategia conjunta que CEDES y UNFPA-Argentina desarrollan para fortalecer el trabajo de los y las obstétricas en la Argentina y en el plan 2022 del Grupo de Trabajo de Obstétricas de REDAAS.