Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38764145

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Platelets are well known for their roles in hemostasis, but they also play a key role in thromboinflammatory pathways by regulating endothelial health, stimulating angiogenesis, and mediating host defense through both contact dependent and independent signaling. When activated, platelets degranulate releasing multiple active substances. We hypothesized that the soluble environment formed by trauma platelet releasates attenuates thromboinflammation via mitigation of trauma induced endothelial permeability and metabolomic reprogramming. METHODS: Blood was collected from injured and healthy patients to generate platelet releasates and plasma in parallel. Permeability of endothelial cells when exposed to trauma platelet releasates (TPR) and plasma (TP) was assessed via resistance measurement by Electric Cell-substrate Impedance Sensing (ECIS). Endothelial cells treated with TPR and TP were subjected to mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. RESULTS: TP increased endothelial permeability, whereas TPR decreased endothelial permeability when compared to untreated cells. When TP and TPR were mixed ex vivo, TPR mitigated TP-induced permeability, with significant increase in AUC compared to TP alone. Metabolomics of TPR and TP demonstrated disrupted redox reactions and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. CONCLUSION: TPRs provide endothelial barrier protection against TP-induced endothelial permeability. Our findings highlight a potential beneficial action of activated platelets on the endothelium in injured patients through disrupted redox reactions and increased antioxidants. Our findings support that soluble signaling from platelet degranulation may mitigate the endotheliopathy of trauma. The clinical implications of this are that activated platelets may prove a promising therapeutic target in the complex integration of thrombosis, endotheliopathy, and inflammation in trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/Epidemiological, Level III.

2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745347

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with type O blood may have an increased risk of hemorrhagic complications due to lower baseline levels of von Willebrand Factor (vWF) and factor VIII, but the transition to a mortality difference in trauma is less clear. We hypothesized that type O trauma patients will have differential proteomic and metabolomic signatures in response to trauma beyond vWF and FVIII alone. METHODS: Patients meeting the highest level of trauma activation criteria were prospectively enrolled. Blood samples were collected upon arrival to the emergency department. Proteomic and metabolomic (multi-omics) analyses of these samples were performed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Demographic, clinical, and multi-omics data were compared between patients with type O blood versus all other patients. RESULTS: There were 288 patients with multi-omics data; 146 (51%) had type O blood. Demographics, injury patterns, and initial vital signs and laboratory measurements were not different between groups. Type O patients had increased lengths of stay (7 vs. 6 days, p = 0.041) and a trend towards decreased mortality secondary to traumatic brain injury compared to other causes (TBI, 44.4 % vs. 87.5%, p = 0.055). Type O patients had decreased levels of mannose-binding lectin (MBL) and MBL associated serine proteases 1 and 2 which are required for the initiation of the lectin pathway of complement activation. Type O patients also had metabolite differences signifying energy metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Blood type O patients have a unique multi-omics signature, including decreased levels of proteins required to activate the lectin complement pathway. This may lead to overall decreased levels of complement activation and decreased systemic inflammation in the acute phase possibly leading to a survival advantage, especially in TBI. However, this may later impair healing. Future work will need to confirm these associations, and animal studies are needed to test therapeutic targets. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Comparative Study, Level IV.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA