RESUMO
CONTEXT: Paltusotine is a nonpeptide selective somatostatin receptor 2 agonist in development as once-daily oral treatment for acromegaly. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paltusotine in the treatment of patients with acromegaly previously controlled with injected somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs). METHODS: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled adults with acromegaly who had insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) ≤1.0 times the upper limit of normal (×ULN) while receiving a stable dose of depot octreotide or lanreotide. Patients were switched from injected SRLs and randomized to receive paltusotine or placebo orally for 36 weeks. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients maintaining IGF-I ≤1.0×ULN. Secondary endpoints were change in IGF-I level, change in Acromegaly Symptom Diary (ASD) score, and maintenance of mean 5-sample growth hormone (GH) <1.0 ng/mL. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was met: 83.3% (25/30) of patients receiving paltusotine and 3.6% (1/28) receiving placebo maintained IGF-I ≤1.0×ULN (odds ratio: 126.53; 95% CI: 13.73, >999.99; P<.0001). Paltusotine was also superior to placebo for all secondary endpoints: mean (±SE) change in IGF-I of 0.04±0.09×ULN versus 0.83±0.1×ULN (P<.0001); mean (±SE) change in ASD score of -0.6±1.5 versus 4.6±1.6 (P=.02); mean GH maintained at <1.0 ng/mL in 20/23 (87.0%) versus 5/18 (27.8%) patients (odds ratio: 16.61; 95% CI: 2.86, 181.36; P=.0003). The most common adverse events were acromegaly symptoms and gastrointestinal effects characteristic of SRLs. CONCLUSION: Replacement of injected SRLs by once-daily oral paltusotine was effective in maintaining both biochemical and symptom control in patients with acromegaly and was well tolerated.
RESUMO
Pituitary adenomas are considered benign tumors, but approximately 10% of them can have an aggressive behavior and more rarely (0.2%) can present metastasis, being classified as pituitary carcinomas. Aggressive adenomas are generally large and invasive tumors that present unusually rapid growth and/or that grow irrespective of conventional treatment with surgery, medical therapy and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, large tumors, as well as invasive tumors are not always aggressive, with this definition being possible only after clinical follow-up of these tumors, with growth rate and response to therapies being key points to its diagnosis. The correct identification and diagnosis of aggressive adenomas is of great importance as they are associated with great morbidity and increased mortality.
Assuntos
Adenoma , Carcinoma , Invasividade Neoplásica , Neoplasias Hipofisárias , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Adenoma/patologia , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/patologia , Humanos , Invasividade Neoplásica/diagnóstico , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/patologiaRESUMO
Introduction: Acromegaly is a rare, serious endocrine disorder characterized by excess growth hormone (GH) secretion by a pituitary adenoma and overproduction of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). Transsphenoidal surgery is the treatment of choice, although many patients require additional interventions. First-generation somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are the current standard of medical therapy; however, not all patients achieve control of GH and IGF-I. Outcomes from a Phase IIIb open-label study of patients with uncontrolled acromegaly on first-generation SSAs switching to pasireotide are reported. Methods: Adults with uncontrolled acromegaly (mean GH [mGH] ≥1 µg/L from a five-point profile over 2 h, and IGF-I >1.3× upper limit of normal [ULN]) despite ≥3 months' treatment with maximal approved doses of long-acting octreotide/lanreotide received open-label long-acting pasireotide 40 mg/28 days. Pasireotide dose could be increased (maximum: 60 mg/28 days) after week 12 if biochemical control was not achieved, or decreased (minimum: 10 mg/28 days) for tolerability. Patients who completed 36 weeks' treatment could continue receiving pasireotide during an extension (weeks 36-72) when concomitant medication for acromegaly was permitted. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients with mGH <1 µg/L and IGF-I