RESUMO

This study was carried out to verify the evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of sotrovimab in patients with COVID-19. This is a systematic review of randomized clinical trials retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Lilacs, and Cochrane Library databases. The risk of bias was measured using the Cochrane Risk and Bias Checklist (RoB 2). For the meta-analysis, RStudio Version 2024.04.2 software was used. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022355786). A total of 1893 studies were identified and four were included in the study. The total population consisted of 5470 patients with COVID-19, 1921 (35%) in the sotrovimab group and 3549 (65%) in the control group (placebo or BRII-196 + BRII-198 or casirivimab + imdevimab or bamlanivimab + etesevimab, administered in a similar way to sotrovimab, in a single dose with a 60-min intravenous infusion). For the effectiveness outcome, three studies presented low risk and one high risk of bias, while for safety all presented high risk of bias. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the sotrovimab and control groups in terms of hospitalization rates (95% confidence interval (CI) - 2.10-0.51; p = 0 > 0.05), use of invasive mechanical ventilation (95% CI - 2.78-0.65; p = 0.35) and mortality (95% CI - 0.92-0.59; p = 0.39). However, sensitivity analysis showed that sotrovimab may be effective in reducing hospitalization rates compared to the control (IV = - 1.57; 95% CI - 2.41-0.73; p = 0.99). The use of sotrovimab in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 had no significant impact on mortality and need for mechanical ventilation and did not appear to be safer compared to controls. However, there was evidence of effectiveness in reducing the rate of hospitalization, although the certainty of the evidence is moderate and the risk of bias is high.

RESUMO

An analysis is presented of the approaches taken by the Brazilian Center for Health Studies (Cebes) and the Brazilian Association of Collective Health (Abrasco) towards the nationalization of health during the Brazilian public health reform between 1976 (when Cebes was founded) and the enshrinement of public health in the Federal Constitution (1988). Discussions are presented of the theoretical and strategic principles defended by their intellectuals and the institutions' positions towards the nationalization of health. By positioning themselves against complete nationalization, they did not break away from the privatizing rationale embedded in the prevailing model of healthcare, and endeavored to conciliate private interests within the new framework for public health.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Metamizole, as known as dipyrone or novaminsulfone is widely used, especially in Latin America, for its analgesic and antipyretic function. However, several countries have banned it due to the risk of agranulocytosis, skin necrosis, and other serious adverse effects. To assess the safety of metamizole compared to other commonly used non-opioid analgesics (paracetamol, ibuprofen, and acetylsalicylic acid). An overview of systematic reviews. The searches were performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus and LILACS databases. Systematic reviews of randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials with adult patients with mild to moderate pain that assessed the adverse effects of metamizole were included. A methodological quality assessment was performed through ROBIS. The protocol of this systematic review was submitted to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Prospero, CRD42021295272). Of 387 identified studies, four were included, with a total of 20,643 participants, all submitted to a single dose by oral, intramuscular, or intravenous route. No study reported a serious adverse effect. However, 60 of 778 patients (7.7%) who used metamizole; 120/828 (14.5%) who used acetylsalicylic acid; 56/443 (12.6%) who used paracetamol; and 27/213 (12.7%) who used ibuprofen had mild adverse effects. A complementary statistical analysis showed that metamizole, at any dose, has a 38.8% lower chance of adverse effects compared to paracetamol and 46.8% compared to acetylsalicylic acid. The results shows that metamizole is a safe drug with evidence of a lower incidence of adverse effects compared to paracetamol and acetylsalicylic acid.

RESUMO

Cold sores require Healthcare professionals to employ specific approaches for prevention and management, with the need for effective therapeutic guidelines and ongoing improvement in patient care. AIM: To evalúate the methodological quality of Clinical Guidelines (CG), clinical guides and manuals for care of the population affected by herpes labialis, to verify their compliance with evidence-based health standards. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A search was conducted for CG on labial herpes in the MedicalLiteratureAnalysis andRetrieval System Online (Medline) database, Google Scholar, Brazilian Virtual Health Library (BVS), and sites of institutions/professional categories, using the descriptors "herpes labialis" or "oral herpes". Document quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II). The Kappa test was used to avoid randomness or poor agreement between results. RESULTS: Analysis of the 12 selected publications on the management of labial herpes revealed flaws in quality, as the publications did not follow a quality standard. The main quality flaws identified were in "rigor in development" and "applicability. ". CONCLUSIONS: Priorities need to be redefined in the development of CG for clinical practice related to fever blisters to reduce the variability of the quality standard, and generate reliable, applicable recommendations.

A Herpes labial requer dos profissionais abordagens específicas para prevenido e manejo, com a ne-cessidade de diretrizes terapéuticas eficazes e continuo aprimoramento do cuidado ao paciente. OBJETIVO: avaliar a qualidade metodológica de documentos que abordaram Diretrizes Clínicas (DC), guias clínicos e manuais para o cuidado da populando afetada pelo herpes labial, verificando sua conformidade com padroes de saúde baseados em evidencias. MATERIAIS E MÉTODO: As DC sobre herpes labial foram pesquisadas na base de dados Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), Google Académico, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) e em sites de instituigoes/categorias profissionais, utilizando os descritores "herpes labial" ou "herpes oral". Utilizamos aferramenta The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II) para a avaliagdo da qualidade. O teste Kappa também foi utilizado para evitar aleatoriedade ou baixa concordáncia entre os resultados. RESULTADOS: Na análise das 12 publicagoes selecionadas sobre o manejo do herpes labial, foram identificadas falhas na qualidade dos documentos, que ndo seguiram um padrdo de qualidade. As principais falhas de qualidade identificadas foram em "rigor no desenvolvimento" e "aplicabilida-de". CONCLUSÃO: é necessário um reenfoque para definir prioridades no desenvolvimento de DC para a prática clínica do herpes labial, a fim de reduzir a variabilidade do padrdo de qualidade e gerar recomendagoes que possam ser confiáveis e aplicáveis.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Several studies suggest that crack cocaine users exhibit higher prevalence of both psychiatric and psychosocial problems, with an aggressive pattern of drug use. Nevertheless, few experimental studies attempted to verify the neurotoxicity after crack cocaine exposure, especially when compared with other routes of cocaine administration. This systematic review aimed to verify whether in vitro and/or in vivo crack cocaine exposure is more neurotoxic than cocaine exposure (snorted or injected). A search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS databases for in vitro and in vivo toxicological studies conducted with either rats or mice, with no distinction with regard to sex or age. Other methods including BioRxiv, BDTD, Academic Google, citation searching, and specialist consultation were also adopted. Two independent investigators screened the titles and abstracts of retrieved studies and subsequently performed full-text reading and data extraction. The quality of the included studies was assessed by the Toxicological data Reliability assessment Tool (ToxRTool). The study protocol was registered with the Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42022332250). Of the twelve studies included, three were in vitro and nine were in vivo studies. According to the ToxRTool, most studies were considered reliable either with or without restrictions, with no one being considered as not reliable. The studies found neuroteratogenic effects, decreased threshold for epileptic seizures, schizophrenic-like symptoms, and cognitive deficits to be associated with crack cocaine exposure. Moreover, both in vitro and in vivo studies reported a worsening in cocaine neurotoxic effect caused by the anhydroecgonine methyl ester (AEME), a cocaine main pyrolysis product, which is in line with the more aggressive pattern of crack cocaine use. This systematic review suggests that crack cocaine exposure is more neurotoxic than other routes of cocaine administration. However, before the scarcity of studies on this topic, further toxicological studies are necessary.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Cold sores require Healthcare professionals to employ specific approaches for prevention and management, with the need for effective therapeutic guidelines and ongoing improvement in patient care. Aim To evalúate the methodological quality of Clinical Guidelines (CG), clinical guides and manuals for care of the population affected by herpes labialis, to verify their compliance with evidence-based health standards. Materials and Method A search was conducted for CG on labial herpes in the MedicalLiteratureAnalysis andRetrieval System Online (Medline) database, Google Scholar, Brazilian Virtual Health Library (BVS), and sites of institutions/professional categories, using the descriptors "herpes labialis" or "oral herpes". Document quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II). The Kappa test was used to avoid randomness or poor agreement between results. Results Analysis of the 12 selected publications on the management of labial herpes revealed flaws in quality, as the publications did not follow a quality standard. The main quality flaws identified were in "rigor in development" and "applicability. " Conclusions Priorities need to be redefined in the development of CG for clinical practice related to fever blisters to reduce the variability of the quality standard, and generate reliable, applicable recommendations.

RESUMO A Herpes labial requer dos profissionais abordagens específicas para prevenido e manejo, com a ne-cessidade de diretrizes terapéuticas eficazes e continuo aprimoramento do cuidado ao paciente. Objetivo avaliar a qualidade metodológica de documentos que abordaram Diretrizes Clínicas (DC), guias clínicos e manuais para o cuidado da populando afetada pelo herpes labial, verificando sua conformidade com padroes de saúde baseados em evidencias. Materiais e Método As DC sobre herpes labial foram pesquisadas na base de dados Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), Google Académico, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) e em sites de instituigoes/categorias profissionais, utilizando os descritores "herpes labial" ou "herpes oral". Utilizamos aferramenta The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II) para a avaliagdo da qualidade. O teste Kappa também foi utilizado para evitar aleatoriedade ou baixa concordáncia entre os resultados. Resultados Na análise das 12 publicagoes selecionadas sobre o manejo do herpes labial, foram identificadas falhas na qualidade dos documentos, que ndo seguiram um padrdo de qualidade. As principais falhas de qualidade identificadas foram em "rigor no desenvolvimento" e "aplicabilida-de". Conclusao é necessário um reenfoque para definir prioridades no desenvolvimento de DC para a prática clínica do herpes labial, a fim de reduzir a variabilidade do padrdo de qualidade e gerar recomendagoes que possam ser confiáveis e aplicáveis.

RESUMO

One-third of cancer pain patients do not experience adequate pain relief using analgesic ladder by the World Health Organization. Interventional procedures, such as epidural morphine, have been considered. This study aimed to review the literature comparing the effects of epidural administration of morphine with the oral route. This systematic review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted with patients with gastrointestinal neoplasm. A search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases to identify studies published up to May 2023. The retrieved study was evaluated using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool and qualitatively synthesized. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach (Prospero: CRD42021264728). Only one RCT, a crossover trial, was included in this systematic review. The study was conducted with ten participants (one withdrawal) and reported a statistically significant difference between both subcutaneous and epidural morphine solutions and oral morphine. The adverse events were not described. The included study presents some concerns of bias and low certainty of evidence on the effectiveness and security of epidural morphine administration. The available literature does not suffice to elucidate whether morphine administration via the epidural route is more effective than other routes. Further RCTs are necessary to improve the level of evidence on the effectiveness and risk-benefit of epidural morphine in the management of cancer pain in gastrointestinal neoplasm patients.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract An analysis is presented of the approaches taken by the Brazilian Center for Health Studies (Cebes) and the Brazilian Association of Collective Health (Abrasco) towards the nationalization of health during the Brazilian public health reform between 1976 (when Cebes was founded) and the enshrinement of public health in the Federal Constitution (1988). Discussions are presented of the theoretical and strategic principles defended by their intellectuals and the institutions' positions towards the nationalization of health. By positioning themselves against complete nationalization, they did not break away from the privatizing rationale embedded in the prevailing model of healthcare, and endeavored to conciliate private interests within the new framework for public health.

Resumo Analisa como o Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saúde (Cebes) e a Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva se comportaram em relação à questão da estatização da saúde pública no processo da reforma sanitária brasileira entre 1976, ano de criação do Cebes, até a institucionalização da saúde na Constituição Federal em 1988. Discutem-se os princípios teóricos e estratégicos defendidos por seus intelectuais, bem como os posicionamentos institucionais das agremiações ao tema da estatização da saúde. Partimos da hipótese de que, ao se posicionar contrárias à estatização integral, não romperam com a lógica privatizante do modelo de saúde até então vigente, uma vez que tentaram conciliar o privado no arcabouço estrutural da saúde pública.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introduction: Emergency Contraception (EC) is available in Brazil since 1996, when it was adopted as one if the family planning strategies and, in 1998, for use in services assisting victims of sexual violence. In the country, its use is regulated by guidelines. Its access through SUS (Unified Health System), however, does not seem to occur in a standardized manner. Methods: The aim of the study was to analyze the availability and barriers to accessing emergency contraception (levonorgestrel) in Brazilian municipalities with more than 500 thousand inhabitants. The survey was carried out by a form sent to the Municipal Health Departments (SMS) managers and a search on the list of standardized medicines by the hospitals in the same municipalities. Results: The Basic Health Units were identified as the standard access places to EC. However, one of the obstacles mentioned is the need for a prescription for dispensing in almost 80% of the analyzed cities. Access in emergency situations at night and on weekends is also uncertain, since although 67% of the places stated that they dispense at the hospital level, the item was only standardized in 21% of the hospital lists. Discussion: The difficult access this drug in the public system essentially tends to harm the poorest women, who are the ones who suffer most from the consequences of an unwanted pregnancy.

RESUMO

The association between death from Covid-19 and case management, especially in small and medium-sized municipalities, is still uncertain. To analyze sociodemographic, clinical, and pharmacological factors associated with death in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), from a Brazilian referral public hospital. This is a cross-sectional study, with data from the hospital records of patients (≥ 18 years old) diagnosed with COVID-19, from March 2020 to March 2021. The sample was classified according to the clinical outcome into two groups (death and discharge), among which statistical associations were performed with the variables of interest, with a 5% significance level. Factors such as need for intensive care, use of mechanical ventilation, and total length of hospital stay was related to higher hospital mortality, as well as the permanence of changes in clinical laboratory testing, including lactic acid, D-dimer, markers of hepatic and renal function, C-Reactive protein, anemia, leukocytosis, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, pH, and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) (P < 0.05). Medications used most frequently in the studied hospital for the treatment of COVID-19, such as enoxaparin, dexamethasone, ivermectin, acetylcysteine, chloroquine, and clarithromycin were correlated with morbimortality (P < 0.05). Clinical outcome was influenced by patient-related factors, such as age and comorbidities, however, therapeutic interventions and the choice of medication also impacted morbimortality. These results reinforce the need for preventive actions and adequate clinical protocols in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.(AU)

A associação entre o óbito pela Covid-19 e o manejo dos casos, principalmente em municípios de pequeno e médio porte, ainda é incerta. Analisar os fatores sociodemográficos, clínicos e farmacológicos associados à morte em pacientes com a doença do Coronavírus 2019 (COVID-19) em um hospital público brasileiro de referência. Trata-se de um estudo transversal realizado com dados dos prontuários de pacientes (≥ 18 anos) diagnosticados com COVID-19 no período de março de 2020 a março de 2021. A amostra foi classificada de acordo com o desfecho clínico em dois grupos (óbito e alta) e foram realizados testes de associação estatística com as variáveis de interesse com nível de significância de 5%. Fatores como necessidade de terapia intensiva, uso de ventilação mecânica e tempo total de internação estiveram relacionados com maior mortalidade hospitalar, assim como a permanência de alterações nos exames laboratoriais clínicos, incluindo ácido lático, D-dímero, marcadores de função hepática e renal, proteína C reativa, anemia, leucocitose, linfopenia, trombocitopenia, pH e saturação de oxigênio no sangue (SpO2) (P < 0,05). Os medicamentos utilizados com maior frequência no hospital para o tratamento de COVID-19, como enoxaparina, dexametasona, ivermectina, acetilcisteína, cloroquina e claritromicina, foram correlacionados com morbimortalidade (P < 0,05). O desfecho clínico foi influenciado por fatores relacionados ao paciente, como idade e comorbidades, porém as intervenções terapêuticas e a escolha dos medicamentos também impactaram na morbimortalidade. Esses resultados reforçam a necessidade de ações preventivas e protocolos clínicos adequados no tratamento de pacientes hospitalizados com COVID-19.(AU)