RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the pelvic lymph node involvement and risk of recurrence in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma stage IA2-IB1 undergoing hysterectomy and/or trachelectomy plus lymphadenectomy, according to Silva's classification system. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in two Colombian cancer centers. The cases were classified according to the Silva classification system. Clinical, surgical, and histopathological variables were evaluated. Recurrence risk was analyzed by patterns A, B, or C. A logistic regression model was performed for tumor recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS). A weighted kappa was performed to determine the degree of concordance between pathologists. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were identified, 33% pattern A, 29% pattern B, and 38% pattern C. The median follow-up time was 42.5 months. No evidence of lymph node involvement was found in patients classified as A and B, while in the C pattern was observed in 15.8% (n = 6) of cases (P < 0.01). There were 7% of cases with recurrent disease, of which 71.5% corresponded to type C pattern. Patients with Silva pattern B and C had 1.22- and 4.46-fold increased risk of relapse, respectively, compared with pattern A. The 5-year DFS values by group were 100%, 96.1%, and 80.3% for patterns A, B, and C, respectively. CONCLUSION: For patients with early-stage HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma, the type C pattern presented more lymph node involvement and risk of recurrence compared to the A and B patterns. The concordance in diagnosis of different Silva's patterns by independents pathologists were good.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Excisão de Linfonodo , Metástase Linfática , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/virologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Histerectomia , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/virologia , Idoso , Pelve , Intervalo Livre de Doença , TraquelectomiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive radical trachelectomy has emerged as an alternative to open radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer desiring future fertility. Recent data suggest worse oncologic outcomes after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy than after open radical hysterectomy in stage I cervical cancer. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare 4.5-year disease-free survival after open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a collaborative, international retrospective study (International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study) of patients treated during 2005-2017 at 18 centers in 12 countries. Eligible patients had squamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma; had a preoperative tumor size of ≤2 cm; and underwent open or minimally invasive (robotic or laparoscopic) radical trachelectomy with nodal assessment (pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or sentinel lymph node biopsy). The exclusion criteria included neoadjuvant chemotherapy or preoperative pelvic radiotherapy, previous lymphadenectomy or pelvic retroperitoneal surgery, pregnancy, stage IA1 disease with lymphovascular space invasion, aborted trachelectomy (conversion to radical hysterectomy), or vaginal approach. Surgical approach, indication, and adjuvant therapy regimen were at the discretion of the treating institution. A total of 715 patients were entered into the study database. However, 69 patients were excluded, leaving 646 in the analysis. Endpoints were the 4.5-year disease-free survival rate (primary), 4.5-year overall survival rate (secondary), and recurrence rate (secondary). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate disease-free survival and overall survival. A post hoc weighted analysis was performed, comparing the recurrence rates between surgical approaches, with open surgery being considered as standard and minimally invasive surgery as experimental. RESULTS: Of 646 patients, 358 underwent open surgery, and 288 underwent minimally invasive surgery. The median (range) patient age was 32 (20-42) years for open surgery vs 31 (18-45) years for minimally invasive surgery (P=.11). Median (range) pathologic tumor size was 15 (0-31) mm for open surgery and 12 (0.8-40) mm for minimally invasive surgery (P=.33). The rates of pelvic nodal involvement were 5.3% (19 of 358 patients) for open surgery and 4.9% (14 of 288 patients) for minimally invasive surgery (P=.81). Median (range) follow-up time was 5.5 (0.20-16.70) years for open surgery and 3.1 years (0.02-11.10) years for minimally invasive surgery (P<.001). At 4.5 years, 17 of 358 patients (4.7%) with open surgery and 18 of 288 patients (6.2%) with minimally invasive surgery had recurrence (P=.40). The 4.5-year disease-free survival rates were 94.3% (95% confidence interval, 91.6-97.0) for open surgery and 91.5% (95% confidence interval, 87.6-95.6) for minimally invasive surgery (log-rank P=.37). Post hoc propensity score analysis of recurrence risk showed no difference between surgical approaches (P=.42). At 4.5 years, there were 6 disease-related deaths (open surgery, 3; minimally invasive surgery, 3) (log-rank P=.49). The 4.5-year overall survival rates were 99.2% (95% confidence interval, 97.6-99.7) for open surgery and 99.0% (95% confidence interval, 79.0-99.8) for minimally invasive surgery. CONCLUSION: The 4.5-year disease-free survival rates did not differ between open radical trachelectomy and minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. However, recurrence rates in each group were low. Ongoing prospective studies of conservative management of early-stage cervical cancer may help guide future management.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/mortalidade , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Preservação da Fertilidade , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Traquelectomia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe oncologic and obstetric outcomes in patients diagnosed with cervical cancer during pregnancy who had a successful delivery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective review was conducted in 12 institutions from six Latin American countries, between January 2007 and December 2018. Data collected included clinical characteristics, neoadjuvant chemotherapy agents, treatment, obstetric and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included. Median age was 34 years (range 31-36). Twenty (60.6%) women were diagnosed at early stage (IB), and 13 (39.4%) with locally advanced stage (IIA-IIIB) according to FIGO 2009 classification. Carboplatin and paclitaxel was the most frequent combination used (60.6%). Partial and complete response rates were 27.3% and 9.1%, respectively. Median gestational age at delivery was 35 weeks (range 34-36). All patients had live births delivered by cesarean section. Obstetric pathology: pre-term labor, placenta percreta or intra-uterine growth restriction, was documented in seven patients (21.2%). Two (6.1%) neonates had low birth weight. Definitive treatment was primary chemo-radiation in 19 (57.6%) patients, radical hysterectomy in 11 (33.3%), abandoned radical hysterectomy with para-aortic lymphadenectomy and ovarian transposition in 1 patient (3.0%), and no further treatment in 2 (6.1%) patients. After a median follow-up of 16.3 months (range 2.0-36.9), 8 (26.7%) patients had recurrent disease. Of these, four (13.3%) died due to disease. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be offered to patients wishing to preserve an ongoing pregnancy in order to achieve fetal maturity. Long-term consequences of chemotherapy in the child are yet to be determined.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Carboplatina/efeitos adversos , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , América Latina , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Gravidez , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: There is significant debate between up-front radical trachelectomy versus neo-adjuvant chemotherapy before fertility-sparing surgery in patients with tumors ≥2 cm. The aim of this study was to report on the oncological and obstetrical outcome of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery, in patients diagnosed with cervical cancer ≥2 cm. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer measuring ≥2 cm to ≤6 cm, who were scheduled to undergo neo-adjuvant chemotherapy before fertility-sparing surgery, at six institutions from four Latin American countries between February 2009 and February 2019. Data collected included: age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage, histology, tumor size, pre-treatment imaging work-up, chemotherapy agents and number of cycles, toxicity, clinical and imaging response rate, type of fertility-sparing surgery, pathology results, timing of lymphadenectomy, follow-up time, and obstetrical and oncological outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were included, with a median age of 27 years (range 20-37): 17 patients had stage IB1, 7 had stage IB2 cervical cancer, and 1 patient had stage IIA1 (FIGO 2009); 23 patients had squamous cell carcinoma and 2 patients had adenocarcinoma. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 3 (range 3-6) and no toxicity grade 3-4 was reported. Lymphadenectomy was performed before chemotherapy in 6 (24%) patients. After neo-adjuvant chemotherapy 20 patients were scheduled for radical trachelectomy (11 abdominal and 9 laparoscopic) and 5 patients for conization. After surgery, no residual disease was found in 11 patients (44%). Fertility was preserved in 23 patients (92%) and 10 patients became pregnant (43.5%). After a median follow-up time of 47 months (13-133), 3 patients had recurrent disease (3/23=13%), 2 were alive without disease, and 1 patient had disease at last contact. CONCLUSION: Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery is feasible in well selected patients with cervical tumors ≥2 cm. Future studies should focus on the timing of lymphadenectomy and type of cervical surgery.
Assuntos
Conização/métodos , Preservação da Fertilidade/métodos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the acceptance rate of treatment alternatives for women with either preinvasive conditions or gynecologic cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic among Latin American gynecological cancer specialists. METHODS: Twelve experts in gynecological cancer designed an electronic survey, according to recommendations from international societies, using an online platform. The survey included 22 questions on five topics: consultation care, preinvasive cervical pathology, and cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancer. The questionnaire was distributed to 1052 specialists in 14 Latin American countries. A descriptive analysis was carried out using statistical software. RESULTS: A total of 610 responses were received, for an overall response rate of 58.0%. Respondents favored offering teleconsultation as triage for post-cancer treatment follow-up (94.6%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (95.6%), and total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and defining adjuvant treatment with histopathological features in early stage endometrial cancer (85.4%). Other questions showed agreement rates of over 64%, except for review of pathology results in person and use of upfront concurrent chemoradiation for early stage cervical cancer (disagreement 56.4% and 58.9%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Latin American specialists accepted some alternative management strategies for gynecological cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may reflect the region's particularities. The COVID-19 pandemic led Latin American specialists to accept alternative management strategies for gynecological cancer care, especially regarding surgical decisions.
Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/terapia , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Feminino , Diretrizes para o Planejamento em Saúde , Humanos , Histerectomia , América Latina , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , Gravidez , Salpingo-Ooforectomia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapiaRESUMO
Skin metastases are a rare event in patients with cervical cancer. One form of such metastasis is carcinomatous lymphangitis, which is a rare presentation of skin metastases. Here we report a woman with cervical cancer diagnosed cutaneous lymphangitic carcinomatosis.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to identify predictive factors in patients with a diagnosis of early-stage cervical cancer after simple hysterectomy in order to avoid a radical parametrectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent radical parametrectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at MD Anderson Cancer Center and at the Instituto de Cancerologia Las Americas in Medellin, Colombia from December 1999 to September 2017. We sought to determine the outcomes in patients diagnosed with low-risk factors (squamous, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous lesions<2cm in size, and invading<10mm) undergoing radical parametrectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The median age was 40.4years (range; 26-60) and median body mass index (BMI) was 26.4kg/m2 (range; 17.7-40.0). A total 22 patients had tumors<1cm and 8 had tumors between 1 and 2cm. A total of 6 (33%) of 18 patients had evidence of lymph-vascular invasion (LVSI). No radical parametrectomy specimen had residual tumor, involvement of the parametrium, vaginal margin positivity, or lymph node metastasis. None of the patients received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 99months (range; 6-160) only one patient recurred. CONCLUSION: Radical parametrectomy may be avoided in patients with low-risk early-stage cervical cancer detected after a simple hysterectomy. Rates of residual disease (parametrial or vaginal) and the need for adjuvant treatments or recurrences are very low.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to report on the feasibility of outpatient laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS: We included all patients who underwent a laparoscopic radical hysterectomy at the Instituto de Cancerología - Las Americas in Medellin, Colombia, between January 2013 and July 2015. The control group was a similar cohort of patients who were admitted after their surgery. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were included [outpatient (31) and admitted (45)]. There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding age, clinical stage, histology, nodal count, need of adjuvant treatment, visual pain scores at discharge or follow up time. All patients underwent a transversus abdominis plane block. The median operative time was 150min (range, 105-240) in the outpatient group vs. 170min (range, 97-300) in the admitted group (p=0.023). The median estimated blood loss was 50ml (range, 20-150) in the outpatient group vs. 120ml (range, 20-1000) in the admitted group (p=0.001). All patients were able to void spontaneously and tolerate a diet before discharge. In patients who were admitted, the median hospital stay was 1day, (range; 1-6), and 39 (87%) were discharged at postoperative day 1. There were 6 postoperative complications, 3 in each group. There were no recurrences in the follow-up period in the outpatient group, and there were 3 (6.6%) recurrences in the admitted group. CONCLUSION: Outpatient laparoscopic radical hysterectomy is feasible and can be performed safely in a developing country in well-selected patients.
Assuntos
Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Perioperatório , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Objetivo: Revisar nuestra experiencia en traquelectomía radical laparoscópica en cáncer de cérvix en estado temprano. Métodos: Estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo de las pacientes que se sometieron a traquelectomía radical laparoscópica en el Instituto de Cancerología - Las Américas, Medellín, Colombia, entre Mayo de 2009 y Enero 2015. Resultados: Se completó satisfactoriamente el procedimiento en 13 pacientes en estadío IB1, 12 (92%) tuvieron tumores menores a 2 cm y una recibió quimioterapia neoadyuvante por un tumor de 3 cm. El tipo histológico más frecuente fue el escamoso en 7 pacientes (54%). En 5 pacientes (38%) no se evidenció enfermedad residual luego del procedimiento. El tiempo quirúrgico promedio fue de 240 min (130-340 min); la mediana de pérdida sanguínea fueron 100 ml (50-200 ml). Dos pacientes tuvieron cistotomía incidental durante la cirugía, reparadas por vía laparoscópica, una de ellas desarrollo una fístula vésico-vaginal que cerró espontáneamente. Ninguna paciente requirió transfusión sanguínea ni conversión a laparotomía. La estancia hospitalaria promedio fue de 1 día (1-3). Dos pacientes requirieron histerectomía laparoscópica. No se han reportado recurrencias ni embarazos con un seguimiento promedio 27,9 meses (8,3-64,4). Conclusión: La traquelectomía radical laparoscópica es factible y se puede realizar de manera segura en un país en desarrollo, en pacientes bien seleccionados, con cáncer de cérvix temprano que desean preservar su fertilidad. Los tiempos de seguimiento aún son cortos para conclusiones definitivas sobre el resultado obstétrico. La seguridad oncológica parece similar a la de la traquelectomía abdominal y/o vaginal.
Objective: To review our experience with laparoscopic radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Methods: We performed a observational descriptive retrospective review of all patients who underwent a laparoscopic radical trachelectomy at the Instituto de Cancerología - Las Americas, Medellin, Colombia, between May 2009 and January 2015. Results: 13 patients completed surgery, 12 patients (92%) were diagnosed as IB1 with tumor size less than 2 cm, and one patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to a 3 cm cervical tumor; histology was squamous cell carcinoma in 7 patients (54%). Five patients (38%) showed no residual disease. The mean surgical time was 240 min (130-340 min); the estimated blood loss was 100 ml (50-200 ml). Two patients had a cystotomy during surgery; one of them developed a vesicovaginal fistula that healed spontaneously. No transfusions were given. No conversions were made. Mean hospital stay 1 day (1-3 day). 2 patients required laparoscopic hysterectomy. To date, no recurrence or pregnancies has been recorded with the median follow up 27.9 months (8.3-64.4 month). Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy is feasible and can be performed safely in a developing country in well-selected patients with early cervical cancer who wish to preserve their fertility. Follow up times are still too short to drive definitive conclusions on obstetric results. The oncological safety appears similar to that of the abdominal trachelectomy and/or vaginal.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Radical trachelectomy is considered standard of care in patients with early-stage cervical cancer interested in future fertility. The goal of this study was to compare operative, oncologic, and fertility outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing open vs. minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients from four institutions who underwent radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer from June 2002 to July 2013. Perioperative, oncologic, and fertility outcomes were compared between patients undergoing open vs. minimally invasive surgery. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in the analysis. Fifty-eight patients underwent open radical trachelectomy and 42 patients underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS=laparoscopic or robotic). There were no differences in patient age, body mass index, race, histology, lymph vascular space invasion, or stage between the two groups. The median surgical time for MIS was 272min [range, 130-441min] compared with 270min [range, 150-373min] for open surgery (p=0.78). Blood loss was significantly lower for MIS vs. laparotomy (50mL [range, 10-225mL] vs. 300mL [50-1100mL]) (p<0.0001). Nine patients required blood transfusion, all in the open surgery group (p=0.010). Length of hospitalization was shorter for MIS than for laparotomy (1day [1-3 days] vs. 4days [1-9 days]) (p<0.0001). Three intraoperative complications occurred (3%): 1 bladder injury, and 1 fallopian tube injury requiring unilateral salpingectomy in the MIS group and 1 vascular injury in the open surgery group. The median lymph node count was 17 (range, 5-47) for MIS vs. 22 (range, 7-48) for open surgery (p=0.03). There were no differences in the rate of postoperative complications (30% MIS vs. 31% open surgery). Among 83 patients who preserved their fertility (33 MIS vs. 50 open surgery), 34 (41%) patients attempted to get pregnant. Sixteen (47%) patients were able to do so (MIS: 2 vs. laparotomy: 14, p=0.01). The pregnancy rate was higher in the open surgery group when compared to the MIS group (51% vs. 28%, p=0.018). However, median follow-up was shorter is the MIS group compared with the open surgery group (25months [range, 10-69] vs. 66months [range, 11-147]). To date, there has been one recurrence in the laparotomy group and none in the MIS group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that radical trachelectomy via MIS results in less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. Fertility rates appear higher in patients undergoing open radical trachelectomy.