RESUMO
O câncer colorretal é uma neoplasia com alta prevalência e letalidade. A razão desse elevado número de mortes é a detecção da doença em estágios metastáticos, de difícil cura e que necessitam de terapia quimioterápica adjuvante ou paliativa. Na atualidade, o principal tratamento quimioterápico dessa neoplasia tem como base as drogas Oxaliplatina ou Irinotecano, isolados ou combinados com outros medicamentos. O objetivo desta revisão sistemática é avaliar se há superioridade do esquema quimioterápico com Irinotecano sobre o regime com Oxaliplatina. Foi realizada a análise de ensaios clínicos randomizados, fase II ou III, nas bases de dados eletrônicas Central e PubMed. Critérios de inclusão: ensaios clínicos randomizados comparando regimes à base de irinotecano ou oxaliplatina como tratamentos de primeira linha para câncer colorretal metastático. O desfecho primário analisado foi a superioridade entre os quimioterápicos sobre a sobrevida global. Os desfechos secundários incluíram sobrevida livre de progressão, taxa de resposta e efeitos colaterais. Registro na PROSPERO: CRD42019130339. Não houve diferença significativa nos 13 estudos sobre a sobrevida dos pacientes. Sobre os efeitos colaterais dos medicamentos, os regimes baseados em irinotecano foram associados a uma alta incidência de neutropenia e diarreia grave. Já os associados com oxaliplatin cursaram com alta incidência de neuropatia sensitiva. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa sobre a sobrevida global, sobrevivência livre de progressão e na taxa de resposta quando comparamos os pacientes que receberam oxaliplatina e irinotecano (AU)
Colorectal cancer is a highly prevalent and lethal neoplasm. The reason for this high number of deaths is the detection of the disease in metastatic stages, which are difficult to cure and require adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy therapy. Currently, the main chemotherapeutic treatment of this neoplasm is based on the drugs Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan, alone or combined with other drugs. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate whether there is superiority of the chemotherapy regimen with Irinotecan over that with Oxaliplatin. Analysis of randomized clinical trials, phase II or III, was performed in the electronic databases Central and PubMed. Inclusion criteria: randomized clinical trials comparing irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based regimens as first-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary endpoint analyzed was the superiority between chemotherapies on overall survival. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, response rate, and side effects. PROSPERO registration: CRD42019130339. There was no significant difference in the 13 studies on patient survival. On drug side effects, irinotecan-based regimens were associated with a high incidence of neutropenia and severe diarrhea. Those associated with oxaliplatin were associated with a high incidence of sensory neuropathy. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate when comparing patients receiving oxaliplatin and irinotecan (AU)
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Irinotecano/uso terapêutico , OxaliplatinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer with pathological non-complete response (non-pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has a worse prognosis. Despite Neo-Bioscore has been validated as an independent prognostic model for breast cancer submitted to NAC, non-pCR carcinoma was not assessed in this setting. METHODS: This is a retrospective trial that included women with localized breast cancer who underwent NAC and had non-pCR carcinoma in surgical specimen between 01/01/2013 to 12/31/2015 with a three-year follow-up. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier estimator and hazard ratio (HR) set by log-rank test for the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS). According to Neo-Bioscore, the proposed prognostic model named Clustered Neo-Bioscore was classified into low (0-3), low-intermediate (4-5), high-intermediate (6) and high (7) risk. The prognostic accuracy for recurrence risk was assessed by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (time-ROC) methodology. Multivariate Cox regression assessed the menopausal status, histological grade, Ki-67, estrogen receptor, HER2, tumor subtype, pathological and clinical stages. Confidence interval at 95% (CI95%) and statistical significance at set 2-sided p-value less than 0.05 were adopted. RESULTS: Among the 310 women enrolled, 267 patients (86.2%) had non-pCR carcinoma presenting size T3/T4 (63.3%), node-positive axilla (74.9%), stage III (62.9%), Ki-67 ≥ 20% (71.9%) and non-luminal A (78.3%). Non-pCR carcinoma presented worse DFS-3y (HR = 3.88, CI95% = 1.18-11.95) but not OS-3y (HR = 2.73, CI95% = 0.66-11.40). Clustered Neo-Bioscore discerned the recurrence risk for non-pCR carcinoma: low (DFS-3y = 0.86; baseline), low-intermediate (DFS-3y = 0.70; HR = 2.61), high-intermediate (DFS-3y = 0.13, HR = 14.05), and high (DFS-3y = not achieved; HR = 22.19). The prognostic accuracy was similar between Clustered Neo-Bioscore and Neo-Bioscore (0.76 vs 0.78, p > 0.05). Triple-negative subtype (HR = 3.6, CI95% = 1.19-10.92) and pathological stages II (HR = 5.35, CI95% = 1.19-24.01) and III (HR = 6.56, CI95% = 1.29-33.32) were prognoses for low-intermediate risk, whereas pathological stage III (HR = 13.0, CI95% = 1.60-106.10) was prognosis for low risk. CONCLUSIONS: Clustered Neo-Bioscore represents a novel prognostic model of non-pCR carcinoma undergoing NAC with a more simplified and appropriate score pattern in the assessment of prognostic factors.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Confiabilidade dos Dados , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Antígeno Ki-67/sangue , Menopausa/fisiologia , Análise Multivariada , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Receptor ErbB-2 , Receptores de Estrogênio , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga TumoralRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: There is insufficient information on predictors of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast carcinoma that also presented clinical complete response (cCR) evaluated in breast, axilla and breast and axilla. METHODS: This retrospective study included 310 women with breast carcinoma who received NAC from 1/1/13 to 12/31/15 with follow-up until 8/31/16. The factors analyzed to predict pCR and cCR were menopausal status, Ki67, estrogen receptor, histologic grade, molecular subtype, tumor size, axilla status, and stage. RESULTS: The cCR/pCR rates were 53.2/16.5% (breast), 76.3/36.8% (axilla) and 50.6/13.9% (breast and axilla). Molecular subtype and HER2-positive were independent predictors to confirm pCR in women with cCR, mainly triple negative (TN) in breast (OR 22.81, 95% CI 7.13-72.96) and breast and axilla (OR 36.06, 95% CI 8.77-148.26), but not in axilla. Ki67 ≥50% expression was predictor of cCR in breast (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.31-3.06) and breast and axilla (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.10-1.45). CONCLUSION: TN subtype and HER2-positive were the main independent predictors of pCR in women who also had cCR to NAC in breast and breast and axilla, but none was predictor in axilla. The Ki67 ≥50% was the independent predictor of cCR in breast and breast and axilla.