Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Med Res ; 30(3): 216-23, 1999.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10427873

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess the magnitude of the risk of high morbidity (> or = 7 episodes/year) for acute respiratory infections (ARI) in infants attending day care centers (DCC), and to compare the incidence, duration, and severity of ARI in children staying at home (Home). METHODS: Using a cohort design, 282 infants (DCC, 138 and Home, 144) were followed for a year. Age at entry into the study ranged from 43 days to 4 months. During follow-up, social workers interviewed the mothers weekly to register whether the infants had an ARI. Also, infant health conditions and physical growth were updated monthly. RESULTS: ARI incidence was 14 episodes per child/year among DCC infants with a median of 74 sick days, while among children at home, the ARI incidence was 6 episodes, and the median was 40 days. The incidence density ratio for DCC children was 2.33 (95% CI, 2.13-2.54); after adjusting for other covariates, the relative risk increased to 5.27 (95% CI, 3.54-7.83). CONCLUSIONS: Infants attending DCCs will suffer ARI more frequently than children cared for at home. We did not find seasonal variations in the incidence rates among DCC infants. The quality of care provided at these facilities should be analyzed in more depth for proposing measures to decrease ARI incidence.


Assuntos
Creches , Infecções Respiratórias/transmissão , Doença Aguda , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , México/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
2.
Gac Med Mex ; 135(2): 121-37, 1999.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10327748

RESUMO

Clinical guidelines provide continuing education and help physicians in the clinical decision-making process. Clinical guidelines to manage acute respiratory infections (ARI) were developed comprehensively from a perspective where prevention, diagnosis, treatment and the patient's education were considered. Methodology. The guideline development process was comprised of two stages: 1. The building stage consisted of several steps: definition of the problem, definition of the potential users of the guidelines, and the appropriate level of care; review of updated bibliographies, and validation using the Delphi technique. 2. The start-up stage consisted of evaluating the guidelines applicable to out-patient settings. Twenty family physicians participated, using the guidelines with 115 patients. Agreement between the family physicians' diagnosis and the criteria stated in the guidelines was tested using unweighted kappa. Differences in the use of the guidelines to manage ARI patients were tested by using the X2 test or the exact Fisher test. Results. Development of guidelines considered the patient's age group. Therefore, guidelines to manage patients under five years of age and to manage patients above this age were constructed. The application of the guidelines was increased from 40 to 60%. As a result, inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics and cough syrups decreased. Although the guidelines could be helpful in treating ARI, its efficacy and effectiveness remain to be tested.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antitussígenos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA