Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Biomed Eng Online ; 20(1): 31, 2021 Mar 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33766046

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The use of machine learning (ML) methods would improve the diagnosis of respiratory changes in systemic sclerosis (SSc). This paper evaluates the performance of several ML algorithms associated with the respiratory oscillometry analysis to aid in the diagnostic of respiratory changes in SSc. We also find out the best configuration for this task. METHODS: Oscillometric and spirometric exams were performed in 82 individuals, including controls (n = 30) and patients with systemic sclerosis with normal (n = 22) and abnormal (n = 30) spirometry. Multiple instance classifiers and different supervised machine learning techniques were investigated, including k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forests (RF), AdaBoost with decision trees (ADAB), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The first experiment of this study showed that the best oscillometric parameter (BOP) was dynamic compliance, which provided moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.77) in the scenario control group versus patients with sclerosis and normal spirometry (CGvsPSNS). In the scenario control group versus patients with sclerosis and altered spirometry (CGvsPSAS), the BOP obtained high accuracy (AUC = 0.94). In the second experiment, the ML techniques were used. In CGvsPSNS, KNN achieved the best result (AUC = 0.90), significantly improving the accuracy in comparison with the BOP (p < 0.01), while in CGvsPSAS, RF obtained the best results (AUC = 0.97), also significantly improving the diagnostic accuracy (p < 0.05). In the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth experiments, different feature selection techniques allowed us to spot the best oscillometric parameters. They resulted in a small increase in diagnostic accuracy in CGvsPSNS (respectively, 0.87, 0.86, 0.82, and 0.84), while in the CGvsPSAS, the best classifier's performance remained the same (AUC = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Oscillometric principles combined with machine learning algorithms provide a new method for diagnosing respiratory changes in patients with systemic sclerosis. The present study's findings provide evidence that this combination may help in the early diagnosis of respiratory changes in these patients.


Assuntos
Diagnóstico por Computador , Aprendizado de Máquina , Oscilometria , Transtornos Respiratórios/complicações , Transtornos Respiratórios/diagnóstico , Escleroderma Sistêmico/complicações , Escleroderma Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Algoritmos , Inteligência Artificial , Biometria , Computadores , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espirometria , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA