RESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Studies regarding asynchrony in patients in the cardiac postoperative period are still only a few. The main objective of our study was to compare asynchronies incidence and its index (AI) in 3 different modes of ventilation (volume-controlled ventilation [VCV], pressure-controlled ventilation [PCV] and pressure-support ventilation [PSV]) after ICU admission for postoperative care. METHODS: A prospective parallel randomised trialin the setting of a non-profitable hospital in Brazil. The participants were patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to VCV or PCV modes of ventilation and later both groups were transitioned to PSV mode. RESULTS: All data were recorded for 5 minutes in each of the three different phases: T1) in assisted breath, T2) initial spontaneous breath and T3) final spontaneous breath, a marking point prior to extubation. Asynchronies were detected and counted by visual inspection method by two independent investigators. Reliability, inter-rater agreement of asynchronies, asynchronies incidence, total and specific asynchrony indexes (AIt and AIspecific) and odds of AI ≥10% weighted by total asynchrony were analysed. A total of 17 patients randomly allocated to the VCV (n=9) or PCV (n=8) group completed the study. High inter-rated agreement for AIt (ICC 0.978; IC95%, 0,963-0.987) and good reliability (r=0.945; p<0.001) were found. Eighty-two % of patients presented asynchronies, although only 7% of their total breathing cycles were asynchronous. Early cycling and double triggering had the highest rates of asynchrony with no difference between groups. The highest odds of AI ≥10% were observed in VCV regardless the phase: OR 2.79 (1.36-5.73) in T1 vs T2, p=0.005; OR 2.61 (1.27-5.37) in T1 vs T3, p=0.009 and OR 4.99 (2.37-10.37) in T2 vs T3, p<0.001. CONCLUSIONS: There was a high incidence of breathing asynchrony in postoperative cardiac patients, especially when initially ventilated in VCV. VCV group had a higher chance of AI ≥10% and this chance remained high in the following PSV phases.
RESUMO
Abstract Introduction: Mobilization is an effective therapy to combat the deleterious effects of immobility, but not all patients are in a condition to be moved; thus, knowledge about contraindication criteria is fundamental. Objective: To evaluate the knowledge of physiotherapists working in adult ICUs on contraindications to the mobilization of critical patients. Method: This was a cross-sectional study in which a survey was applied to physiotherapists working in an adult ICU in the city of Recife. Results: Out of the 36 criteria presented, only five were considered contraindication criteria. Clinical parameters were those that obtained higher frequency for not being considered criteria for contraindication, nor were there observed differences in the relation between the time of working in the ICU. Conclusion: Most physiotherapists did not consider the criteria presented as contraindications to mobilization, so that professional training in mobilization practices and the creation of protocols are necessary.
Resumo Introdução: A mobilização é uma terapia eficaz para combater os efeitos deletérios do imobilismo, contudo, é sabido que nem todos os pacientes apresentam condições de saúde para recebê-la, sendo assim, é fundamental o conhecimento sobre os critérios de contraindicação. Objetivo: Avaliar o conhecimento dos fisioterapeutas atuantes em UTI adulto sobre as contraindicações à mobilização de pacientes críticos na cidade do Recife. Método: Este é um estudo transversal, no qual foi aplicado um inquérito aos fisioterapeutas atuantes em UTI adulto na cidade do Recife. Resultados: Dos 36 critérios expostos, apenas cinco foram considerados critérios de contraindicação. Os parâmetros clínicos foram os que obtiveram maior frequência como não sendo considerados critérios de contraindicação, também não foram observadas diferenças na relação entre grau acadêmico e o conhecimento dos critérios, assim como no tempo de atuação em UTI. Conclusão: Uma proporção significativa dos fisioterapeutas atuantes em UTI não considera os critérios expostos como contraindicações à prática da mobilização, sendo assim necessário o aperfeiçoamento profissional sobre as práticas da mobilização e a criação de protocolos.