RESUMO

PURPOSE: The rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic around the world caused most healthcare services to turn substantial attention to treatment of these patients and also to alter the structure of healthcare systems to address an infectious disease. As a result, many cancer patients had their treatment deferred during the pandemic, increasing the time-to-treatment initiation, the number of untreated patients (which will alter the dynamics of healthcare delivery in the post-pandemic era) and increasing their risk of death. Hence, we analyzed the impact on global cancer mortality considering the decline in oncology care during the COVID-19 outbreak using head and neck cancer, a known time-dependent disease, as a model. METHODS: An online practical tool capable of predicting the risk of cancer patients dying due to the COVID-19 outbreak and also useful for mitigation strategies after the peak of the pandemic has been developed, based on a mathematical model. The scenarios were estimated by information of 15 oncological services worldwide, given a perspective from the five continents and also some simulations were conducted at world demographic data. RESULTS: The model demonstrates that the more that cancer care was maintained during the outbreak and also the more it is increased during the mitigation period, the shorter will be the recovery, lessening the additional risk of dying due to time-to-treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS: This impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients is inevitable, but it is possible to minimize it with an effort measured by the proposed model.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a highly contagious zoonosis produced by SARS-CoV-2 that is spread human-to-human by respiratory secretions. It was declared by the WHO as a public health emergency. The most susceptible populations, needing mechanical ventilation, are the elderly and people with associated comorbidities. There is an important risk of contagion for anesthetists, dentists, head and neck surgeons, maxillofacial surgeons, ophthalmologists, and otolaryngologists. Health workers represent between 3.8% and 20% of the infected population; some 15% will develop severe complaints and among them, many will lose their lives. A large number of patients do not have overt signs and symptoms (fever/respiratory), yet pose a real risk to surgeons (who should know this fact and must therefore apply respiratory protective strategies for all patients they encounter). All interventions that have the potential to aerosolize aerodigestive secretions should be avoided or used only when mandatory. Health workers who are: pregnant, over 55 to 65 years of age, with a history of chronic diseases (uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, and all clinical scenarios where immunosuppression is feasible, including that induced to treat chronic inflammatory conditions and organ transplants) should avoid the clinical attention of a potentially infected patient. Health care facilities should prioritize urgent and emergency visits and procedures until the present condition stabilizes; truly elective care should cease and discussed on a case-by-case basis for patients with cancer. For those who are working with COVID-19 infected patients' isolation is compulsory in the following settings: (a) unprotected close contact with COVID-19 pneumonia patients; (b) onset of fever, cough, shortness of breath, and other symptoms (gastrointestinal complaints, anosmia, and dysgeusia have been reported in a minority of cases). For any care or intervention in the upper aerodigestive tract region, irrespective of the setting and a confirmed diagnosis (eg, rhinoscopy or flexible laryngoscopy in the outpatient setting and tracheostomy or rigid endoscopy under anesthesia), it is strongly recommended that all health care personnel wear personal protective equipment such as N95, gown, cap, eye protection, and gloves. The procedures described are essential in trying to maintain safety of health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, otolaryngologists, head and neck, and maxillofacial surgeons are per se exposed to the greatest risk of infection while caring for COVID-19 positive subjects, and their protection should be considered a priority in the present circumstances.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

The free fibula flap is the preferred reconstructive method for oncologic defects of the mandible. Arterial inflow of the extremity is routinely evaluated with several modalities; however, venous screening is rarely performed. Patients with cancer are at elevated risk of occult deep venous thrombosis (DVT). An asymptomatic thrombus encountered during free fibula reconstruction is a serious concern. Although such cases have been reported, we suspect the incidence of DVT during fibula free flap harvest is underappreciated. This monograph uses a case example to review risk factors for occult DVT, present a strategy for preoperative assessment, and provide a reconstructive algorithm to for mandibular reconstruction in such instances.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To estimate the overall survival (OS) impact from increasing time to treatment initiation (TTI) for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we examined patients who received curative therapy for the following sites: oral tongue, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx. TTI was the number of days from diagnosis to initiation of curative treatment. The effect of TTI on OS was determined by using Cox regression models (MVA). Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) identified TTI thresholds via conditional inference trees to estimate the greatest differences in OS on the basis of randomly selected training and validation sets, and repeated this 1,000 times to ensure robustness of TTI thresholds. RESULTS: A total of 51,655 patients were included. On MVA, TTI of 61 to 90 days versus less than 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.19) independently increased mortality risk. TTI of 67 days appeared as the optimal threshold on the training RPA, statistical significance was confirmed in the validation set (P < .001), and the 67-day TTI was the optimal threshold in 54% of repeated simulations. Overall, 96% of simulations validated two optimal TTI thresholds, with ranges of 46 to 52 days and 62 to 67 days. The median OS for TTI of 46 to 52 days or fewer versus 53 to 67 days versus greater than 67 days was 71.9 months (95% CI, 70.3 to 73.5 months) versus 61 months (95% CI, 57 to 66.1 months) versus 46.6 months (95% CI, 42.8 to 50.7 months), respectively (P < .001). In the most recent year with available data (2011), 25% of patients had TTI of greater than 46 days. CONCLUSION: TTI independently affects survival. One in four patients experienced treatment delay. TTI of greater than 46 to 52 days introduced an increased risk of death that was most consistently detrimental beyond 60 days. Prolonged TTI is currently affecting survival.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Squamous cell carcinoma of an unknown primary (SCCUP) of the head and neck is a rare disease. As a diagnosis of exclusion, the manner in which it is assigned merits consideration. Despite the development and refinement of several techniques designed to locate an occult tumor, including cross-sectional anatomic imaging, functional imaging, and transoral surgical techniques, delineating SCCUP remains an active clinical problem. Its relative rarity has prevented prospective study of the entity. Hence, investigators must rely on retrospective analyses to understand the disease and its appropriate treatment. The current understanding of SCCUP differs substantially from when it was initially described decades ago. The most common site of a small primary tumor initially thought to represent SCCUP is the tonsil or base of the tongue, and an increasing percentage are associated with human papilloma virus. Modern treatment of SCCUP by neck dissection alone, neck dissection followed by radiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy, or primary chemoradiation according to initial nodal disease burden produces extraordinarily low recurrence rates. Whether the potential mucosal primary site and/or the contralateral neck should be electively treated is controversial. Efficacy data seem to be similar; therefore, an evaluation of the toxicity of both treatment paradigms is warranted.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Retrospective studies suggested that head and neck cancers associated with human papilloma virus (HPV) are more frequently cured than those caused by substance use. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) subsequently confirmed the observation in a prospective trial. Most HPV-initiated cancers arise in the oropharynx. Survival differences between patients with cancers caused by HPV and those caused by alcohol and tobacco use persist despite modern treatment. The impression that treatment intensification has resulted in improved survivorship may well be attributable to an increasing proportion of patients with cancers caused by HPV infection. Unsatisfactory results for cancers attributable to substance use and encouraging improvements in tumor control for patients with HPV-initiated cancers have led to dissatisfaction with the current nonsurgical management paradigm. Ongoing advances in surgical techniques permit transoral resection of oropharyngeal cancers, thus limiting exposure-related morbidity and permitting ready recovery in terms of speech and swallowing. Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) is increasingly employed and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has dramatically popularized surgical treatment of oropharyngeal cancers. Resection affords the opportunity to increase local control at the primary site and surgical management of neck allows risk-based stratification of postoperative radiation therapy. Case series from several institutions show encouraging results. Transoral surgical resection is safe, can be undertaken with acceptable morbidity, and provides comparable locoregional control to that achieved with chemoradiation. Prospective trials for patients with HPV-initiated cancers, as well as those referable to substance use, are underway.

Assuntos