RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between race/ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes in individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Individuals with SLE from the US with data entered into the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance registry between March 24, 2020 and August 27, 2021 were included. Variables included age, sex, race, and ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, other), comorbidities, disease activity, pandemic time period, glucocorticoid dose, antimalarials, and immunosuppressive drug use. The ordinal outcome categories were: not hospitalized, hospitalized with no oxygenation, hospitalized with any ventilation or oxygenation, and death. We constructed ordinal logistic regression models evaluating the relationship between race/ethnicity and COVID-19 severity, adjusting for possible confounders. RESULTS: We included 523 patients; 473 (90.4%) were female and the mean ± SD age was 46.6 ± 14.0 years. A total of 358 patients (74.6%) were not hospitalized; 40 patients (8.3%) were hospitalized without oxygen, 64 patients (13.3%) were hospitalized with any oxygenation, and 18 (3.8%) died. In a multivariable model, Black (odds ratio [OR] 2.73 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.36-5.53]) and Hispanic (OR 2.76 [95% CI 1.34-5.69]) individuals had higher odds of more severe outcomes than White individuals. CONCLUSION: Black and Hispanic individuals with SLE experienced more severe COVID-19 outcomes, which is consistent with findings in the US general population. These results likely reflect socioeconomic and health disparities and suggest that more aggressive efforts are needed to prevent and treat infection in this population.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Reumatologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Etnicidade , Hispânico ou Latino , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Brancos , Negro ou Afro-AmericanoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Procedural simulation training for difficult airway management offers acquisition opportunities. The hypothesis was that 3 hours of procedural simulation training for difficult airway management improves: acquisition, behavior, and patient outcomes as reported 6 months later. METHODS: This prospective comparative study took place in two medical universities. Second-year residents of anesthesiology and intensive care from one region participated in 3h procedural simulation (intervention group). No intervention was scheduled for their peers from the other region (control). Prior to simulation and 6 months later, residents filled-out the same self-assessment form collecting experience with different devices. The control group filled-out the same forms simultaneously. The primary endpoint was the frequency of use of each difficult airway management device within groups at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included modifications of knowledge, skills, and patient outcomes with each device at 6 months. Intervention cost assessment was provided. RESULTS: 44 residents were included in the intervention group and 16 in the control group. No significant difference was observed for the primary endpoint. In the intervention group, improvement of knowledge and skills was observed at 6 months for each device, and improvement of patient outcomes was observed with the use of malleable intubation stylet and Eschmann introducer. No such improvement was observed in the control group. Estimated intervention cost was 406 per resident. CONCLUSIONS: A 3h procedural simulation training for difficult airway management did not improve the frequency of use of devices at 6 months by residents. However, other positive effects suggest exploring the best ratio of time/acquisition efficiency with difficult airway management simulation. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02470195.
Assuntos
Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/métodos , Anestesiologia/educação , Internato e Residência , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Adulto , Competência Clínica , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Avaliação Educacional , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Masculino , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Abstract Background and objectives Procedural simulation training for difficult airway management offers acquisition opportunities. The hypothesis was that 3 hours of procedural simulation training for difficult airway management improves: acquisition, behavior, and patient outcomes as reported 6 months later. Methods This prospective comparative study took place in two medical universities. Second-year residents of anesthesiology and intensive care from one region participated in 3 h procedural simulation (intervention group). No intervention was scheduled for their peers from the other region (control). Prior to simulation and 6 months later, residents filled-out the same self-assessment form collecting experience with different devices. The control group filled-out the same forms simultaneously. The primary endpoint was the frequency of use of each difficult airway management device within groups at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included modifications of knowledge, skills, and patient outcomes with each device at 6 months. Intervention cost assessment was provided. Results 44 residents were included in the intervention group and 16 in the control group. No significant difference was observed for the primary endpoint. In the intervention group, improvement of knowledge and skills was observed at 6 months for each device, and improvement of patient outcomes was observed with the use of malleable intubation stylet and Eschmann introducer. No such improvement was observed in the control group. Estimated intervention cost was 406€ per resident. Conclusions A 3 h procedural simulation training for difficult airway management did not improve the frequency of use of devices at 6 months by residents. However, other positive effects suggest exploring the best ratio of time/acquisition efficiency with difficult airway management simulation. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02470195.
Resumo Justificativa e objetivos O treinamento em simulação para o manejo de via aérea difícil oferece oportunidades de aprendizagem. A hipótese foi que um treinamento em simulação de procedimentos de três horas, para o manejo de via aérea difícil, melhoraria o aprendizado, o comportamento e os resultados dos pacientes, conforme relatado seis meses após o treinamento. Métodos Este estudo comparativo prospectivo foi realizado em duas universidades médicas. Residentes do segundo ano de anestesiologia e terapia intensiva de uma região participaram de um curso de três horas em simulação de procedimentos (grupo intervenção). Nenhuma intervenção foi programada para seus pares da outra região (grupo controle). Antes da simulação e seis meses após, os residentes preencheram a mesma ficha de autoavaliação sobre sua experiência com diferentes dispositivos. O grupo controle preencheu os mesmos formulários simultaneamente. O desfecho primário foi a frequência de uso de cada dispositivo para o manejo de via aérea difícil dentro dos grupos aos seis meses. Os pontos de corte secundários incluíram modificações em relação ao conhecimento, às habilidades e aos resultados dos pacientes com cada dispositivo aos seis meses. A avaliação do custo da intervenção foi registrada. Resultados Foram incluídos no grupo intervenção 44 residentes e 16 no grupo controle. Nenhuma diferença significativa foi observada para o ponto de corte primário. No grupo intervenção, a melhoria do conhecimento e das habilidades foi observada aos seis meses para cada dispositivo e a melhoria dos desfechos dos pacientes foi analisada com o uso de estilete maleável e do introdutor de Eschmann para intubação. Nenhuma melhoria foi observada no grupo controle. O custo da intervenção estimado foi de 406€ por residente. Conclusões Um treinamento simulado de três horas para o manejo de via aérea difícil não melhorou a frequência do uso de dispositivos pelos residentes aos seis meses. No entanto, outros efeitos positivos sugerem a exploração da melhor relação tempo/eficiência de aquisição de conhecimento com a simulação do manejo de via aérea difícil. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02470195.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/métodos , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Internato e Residência , Anestesiologia/educação , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Competência Clínica , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Avaliação Educacional , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To measure sleep patterns and quality, objectively and subjectively, in clinically stable children with cystic fibrosis (CF) and healthy control children, and to examine the relationship between sleep quality and disease severity. STUDY DESIGN: Clinically stable children with CF and healthy control children (7-18 years of age) were recruited. Sleep patterns and quality were measured at home with actigraphy (14 days). Overnight peripheral capillary oxygen saturation was measured via the use of pulse oximetry. Daytime sleepiness was evaluated by the Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) and subjective sleep quality by the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children and Obstructive Sleep Apnea-18. RESULTS: A total of 87 children with CF and 55 control children were recruited with no differences in age or sex. Children with CF had significantly lower total sleep time and sleep efficiency than control children due to frequent awakenings and more wake after sleep onset. In children with CF, forced expiratory volume in 1 second and overnight peripheral capillary oxygen saturation nadir correlated positively with total sleep time and sleep efficiency and negatively with frequency of awakenings and wake after sleep onset. Patients with CF had significantly greater Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (45 vs 35; P < .001), Obstructive Sleep Apnea-18 (35 vs 24; P < .001), and PDSS scores (14 vs 11; P < .001). There was a negative correlation between PDSS and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (r = -0.23; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Even in periods of clinical stability, children with CF get less sleep than their peers due to more time in wakefulness during the night rather than less time spent in bed. Objective measures of sleep disturbance and subjective daytime sleepiness were related to disease severity. In contrast, parents of children with CF report high levels of sleep disturbance unrelated to disease severity.
Assuntos
Fibrose Cística/complicações , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/etiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Actigrafia/métodos , Adolescente , Distribuição por Idade , Austrália , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Fibrose Cística/diagnóstico , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Oximetria/métodos , Polissonografia/métodos , Prognóstico , Troca Gasosa Pulmonar , Valores de Referência , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Distribuição por Sexo , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/diagnóstico , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is often diagnosed late in the course of the disease and improved methods for early diagnosis are required. We have tested the ability of genetic profiling to diagnose axial SpA (axSpA) as a whole group, or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) alone, in a cohort of chronic back pain patients. METHODS: 282 patients were recruited from centres in the United Kingdom, Germany, Taiwan, Canada, Columbia and Turkey as part of the ASAS classification criteria for axSpA study (ASAS cohort). Subjects were classified according to the ASAS axSpA criteria, and the modified New York Criteria for AS. Patients were genotyped for ~200,000 immune-mediated disease SNPs using the Illumina Immunochip. RESULTS: We first established the predictive accuracy of genetic data comparing 9,638 healthy controls and 4,428 AS cases from the homogenous International Genetics of AS (IGAS) Consortium Immunochip study which showed excellent predictive power (AUC=0.91). Genetic risk scores had lower predictive power (AUC=0.83) comparing ASAS cohort axSpA cases meeting the ASAS imaging criteria with IGAS controls. Comparing genetic risk scores showed moderate discriminatory capacity between IGAS AS and ASAS imaging positive cases (AUC 0.67±0.05), indicating that significant differences in genetic makeup exist between the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical setting of referred back pain patients suspected to have axial SpA we were unable to use genetic data to construct a predictive model better than that based on existing clinical data. Potential confounding factors include significant heterogeneity in the ASAS cohort, possibly reflecting the disease heterogeneity of axSpA, or differences between centres in ascertainment or classification performance.