RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The rationale for discarding the skin knife blade and replacing it with another blade for deeper dissection is to prevent bacteria that may be present on the skin from being carried into the deeper layers of the wound. This practice is very controversial because numerous, yet limited, studies exist that support and refute the findings. The purpose of this study was to directly compare the rate of contamination of a skin knife blade with a control blade. METHODS: We took the surface samples using Replicate Organism Detection and Counting plates of 344 knife blades immediately after making skin incision during the following four types of orthopaedic cases: total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, lumbar spine surgery, and cervical spine surgery. At the same time, we sampled 344 control blades. The comparison of positives skin versus control, overall and within each subgroup was done using a bivariate two-sample z-test for the equality of proportions. RESULTS: Overall, 35 (5.1%) of the 688 specimens had a positive result. No difference was noted in the rate of positive cultures for the 344 skin blades 4.9% and the 344 control blades 5.2%. No differences were observed in the rate of positive specimens for skin blades (7.4%, 3.4%, 7.7%, and 3.9%) and control blades (2.5%, 4.1%, 7.7%, and 9.2%) for total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, C spine, and L spine, respectively. No differences were observed regarding skin prep, room number, case order, room turnover time, or in-room to incision time. Staphylococus species was the predominant bacteria identified. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence to support the theoretical advantage of changing the knife blade after making skin incision to avoid contamination. Contamination rates were the same for both the skin and control blades overall and for all subgroup analysis.