RESUMO
Aim: In countries where access to mammography equipment and skilled personnel is limited, most breast cancer (BC) cases are detected in locally advanced stages. Infrared breast thermography is recognized as an adjunctive technique for the detection of BC due to its advantages such as safety (by not emitting ionizing radiation nor applying any stress to the breast), portability, and low cost. Improved by advanced computational analytics techniques, infrared thermography could be a valuable complementary screening technique to detect BC at early stages. In this work, an infrared-artificial intelligence (AI) software was developed and evaluated to help physicians to identify potential BC cases. Methods: Several AI algorithms were developed and evaluated, which were learned from a proprietary database of 2,700 patients, with BC cases that were confirmed through mammography, ultrasound, and biopsy. Following by evaluation of the algorithms, the best AI algorithm (infrared-AI software) was submitted to a clinic validation process in which its ability to detect BC was compared to mammography evaluations in a double-blind test. Results: The infrared-AI software demonstrated efficiency values of 94.87% sensitivity, 72.26% specificity, 30.08% positive predictive value (PPV), and 99.12% negative predictive value (NPV), whereas the reference mammography evaluation reached 100% sensitivity, 97.10% specificity, 81.25% PPV, and 100% NPV. Conclusions: The infrared-AI software here developed shows high BC sensitivity (94.87%) and high NPV (99.12%). Therefore, it is proposed as a complementary screening tool for BC.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical, radiological, and histopathological characteristics that could be predictive factors of microinvasive/invasive breast carcinoma in patients with diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by core-needle biopsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study conducted from 2006-2017, which included women ≥18 years of age with initial DCIS, and who were treated with surgery. Final diagnosis was divided in DCIS and microinvasive/invasive carcinoma. RESULTS: 334 patients were included: 193 (57.8%) with DCIS and 141 (42.2%) with microinvasive/invasive carcinoma (microinvasive 5.1%, invasive 37.1%). Lymph node metastasis occurred in 16.3%. Differences between DCIS and microinvasive/invasive groups included the presence of palpable nodule (36.7% vs. 63.2%), radiological nodule (29% vs. 51%), bigger radiological-tumor size (1.2 cm vs. 1.7 cm), and larger microcalcification extension (2.5 cm vs. 3.1 cm), all of these variables p ≤0.05. Hormonal receptors and HER2 expression were similar. After logistic regression analysis, predictive factor of invasion was the presence of palpable nodule (OR = 4.072, 95%CI = 2.520-6.582, p <0.001) and radiological multicentric disease (OR = 1.677, 95%CI = 1.036-2.716, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with DCIS, palpable nodule, and radiological multicentric disease, upgrade to microinvasive/invasive is high, and sentinel lymph node is recommended.
OBJETIVO: Identificar características clínicas, radiológicas e histopatológicas como factores predictivos de carcinoma mamario microinvasor/invasor en pacientes con Carcinoma Ductal In Situ (CDIS) diagnosticado mediante aguja de corte. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de 20062017, en mujeres ≥18 años con CDIS diagnosticado con aguja de corte y tratadas con cirugía. Los diagnósticos finales fueron CDIS y carcinoma microinvasor/invasor. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 334 pacientes, 193 (57.8%) con CDIS y 141 (42.2%) con carcinoma microinvasor/invasor (microinvasor 5.1%, invasor 37.1%). Hubo 16.3% casos con afección ganglionar. Las diferencias entre el grupo de CDIS y carcinoma microinvasor/invasor fue la presencia de tumor palpable (36.7% vs. 63.2%), nódulo visto por imagen (29% vs. 51%), tumores más grandes (1.2 cm vs. 1.7 cm), y mayor extensión de microcalcificaciones (2.5 cm vs. 3.1 cm), estas variables con p ≤0.05. Los receptores hormonales y HER2 fueron similares. En el análisis de regresión logística, los factores predictivos de invasión fueron tumor palpable (OR = 4.072, IC95% = 2.5206.582, p <0.001) y multicentricidad radiológica (OR = 1.677, IC95% = 1.0362.716, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONES: En CDIS, tumor palpable y enfermedad multicéntrica radiológica, el escalamiento a carcinoma microinvasor/invasor es alto y es recomendable realizar ganglio centinela.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante , Biópsia por Agulha , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Biópsia de Linfonodo SentinelaRESUMO
Benign and malignant pathology can develop in ectopic axillary breast tissue, such as fibroadenomas, phyllodes tumors, and breast cancer. We present a rare case of an asymptomatic 43-year-old woman with an axillary nodule which was identified during screening mammography within ectopic axillary breast tissue, initially considered as a suspicious lymph node. Radiologic studies were considered as Breast Imaging-Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) 4. A hyperdense, lobular, and well-circumscribed nodule was identified in mammogram while the nodule by ultrasound (US) was hypoechoic with indistinct microlobular margins, without vascularity by Doppler, and measuring 1.26 × 1 cm. Core-needle biopsy reported a fibroepithelial neoplasm. The patient was submitted to local wide-needle excision located in intraoperative radiography of the surgical specimen and margin evaluation. Final histopathological study reported a 1.8 × 1.2 cm benign phyllodes tumor, with irregular, pushing, and clear wide margins within normal ectopic breast tissue. The patient without surgical complications continued annual screening without recurrence during a follow-up that took place 24 months later.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Phyllodes tumor (PT) of the breast in Hispanic patients is more frequently reported with large tumors and with more borderline/malignant subtypes compared with other populations. The objective of this study was to describe characteristics of patients with PT and to identify differences among subtypes in a Mexican population. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with PT. Sociodemographic, histopathologic, and treatment characteristics were compared among subtypes, including only surgically treated cases due the complete surgical-specimen study requirement for appropriate WHO classification. RESULTS: During 10 years, 346 PT were diagnosed; only 307 were included (305 patients), with a mean age of 41.7 yr. Self-detected lump took place in 91.8%, usually discovered 6 months previously, with median tumor size of 4.5 cm. Local wide excisions were done in 213 (69.8%) and mastectomies in 92 (30.1%). Immediate breast reconstruction took place in 38% and oncoplastic procedures in 23%. PT were classified as benign in 222 (72.3%) cases, borderline in 50 (16.2%), and malignant in 35 (11.4%), with pathological tumor size of 4.2, 5.4, and 8.7 cm, respectively (P<0.001). Patients with malignant PT were older (48 yr), with more diabetics (14.3%), less breastfeeding (37.1%), more smokers (17.1%), with more postmenopausal cases (42.9%), and older age at menopause (51.5 years) compared with the remaining subtypes (P<0.05). Relapse occurred in 8.2% of patients with follow-up. CONCLUSION: In comparison with other Hispanic publications, these Mexican patients had similar age, with smaller tumors, modestly higher benign PT, fewer malignant PT, and lower documented relapse cases.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ still controversial, with positive lymph node in range of 1.4-12.5% due occult invasive breast carcinoma in surgical specimen. OBJECTIVE: To know the frequency of sentimel node metastases in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ, identify differences between positive and negative cases. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy because mastectomy indication, palpable tumor, radiological lesion = 5 cm, non-favorable breast-tumor relation and/or patients whom surgery could affect lymphatic flow drainage. RESULTS: Of 168 in situ carcinomas, 50 cases with ductal carcinoma in situ and sentinel lymph node biopsy were included, with a mean age of 51.6 years, 30 (60%) asymptomatic. The most common symptoms were palpable nodule (18%), nipple discharge (12%), or both (8%). Microcalcifications were common (72%), comedonecrosis pattern (62%), grade-2 histology (44%), and 28% negative hormonal receptors. Four (8%) cases had intra-operatory positive sentinel lymph node and one patient at final histo-pathological study (60% micrometastases, 40% macrometastases), all with invasive carcinoma in surgical specimen. Patients with intra-operatory positive sentinel lymph node where younger (44.5 vs 51 years), with more palpable tumors (50% vs 23.1%), and bigger (3.5 vs 2 cm), more comedonecrosis pattern (75% vs 60.8%), more indifferent tumors (75% vs 39.1%), and less cases with hormonal receptors (50% vs 73.9%), compared with negative sentinel lymph node cases, all these differences without statistic significance. CONCLUSIONS: One of each 12 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ had affection in sentinel lymph node, so we recommend continue doing this procedure to avoid second surgeries due the presence of occult invasive carcinoma.
Antecedentes: en pacientes con carcinoma ductal in situ la biopsia de ganglio centinela es motivo de controversia porque se reportan ganglios positivos en 1.4-12.5% debido al carcinoma invasor oculto en la pieza quirúrgica. Objetivo: conocer la frecuencia de metástasis en ganglio centinela en pacientes con carcinoma ductal in situ e identificar las diferencias entre los casos positivos y negativos. Material y métodos: estudio retrospectivo, transversal, analítico de pacientes con carcinoma ductal in situ a quienes se realizó una biopsia de ganglio centinela por requerir mastectomía, tener un tumor palpable, lesión radiológica = 5 cm, inadecuada relación mama-tumor o porque la escisión pudiera afectar el flujo linfático. Resultados: de 168 carcinomas in situ, se incluyeron 50 casos con carcinoma ductal in situ y biopsia de ganglio centinela, de pacientes con edad promedio de 51.6 años, 30 (60%) de ellas asintomáticas. Los signos reportados fueron: nódulo palpable (18%), secreción por el pezón (12%) o ambos (8%). Predominaron las microcalcificaciones (72%), comedonecrosis (62%) y grado histológico -2 (44%) con 28% de receptores hormonales negativos. En el estudio transoperatorio 4 (8%) pacientes tuvieron ganglio centinela positivo y un caso en estudio histopatológico definitivo (60% micrometástasis, 40% macrometástasis), todos con carcinoma invasor en la pieza quirúrgica. Las pacientes con ganglio centinela transoperatorio positivo eran más jóvenes (44.5 vs 51 años), con más tumores palpables (50 vs 23.1%), más grandes (3.5 vs 2 cm), más comedonecrosis (75 vs 60.8%), más indiferenciados (75% vs 39.1%) y menos receptores hormonales (50 vs 73.9%), que las que tenían ganglio centinela negativo, sin que estas diferencias tuvieran significación estadística. Conclusiones: puesto que 1 de cada 12 pacientes con carcinoma ductal in situ tiene afectación ganglionar en el ganglio centinela, se recomienda seguir tomando la biopsia para evitar segundas cirugías por un carcinoma invasor oculto.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/secundário , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Adulto , Axila , Calcinose/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Lobular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Lobular/secundário , Estrogênios , Feminino , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Mamografia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/secundário , Fluido do Aspirado de Mamilo , Progesterona , História ReprodutivaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is heterogeneous, with different responses to NC even within similar histology and stages. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical/pathological response to NC according to different tumor subtypes in Mexican breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with breast cancer stages II-III, and complete immunohistochemistry (IHC), such as hormonal receptors HER2 and Ki67, treated with NC and surgery. Descriptive and comparative analyses between different intrinsic subtypes were performed. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were included with 48.6 ± 10.6 years of age, stage II (24%), and III (76%). We identified 20 (17.1%) cases of luminal A, 37 (31.6%) luminal B HER2-, 13 (11.1%) luminal B HER2+, 12 (10.3%) HER2+, and 35 (29.9%) triple negative. Clinical complete response (tumor and lymph nodes) in luminal A was 10%, in luminal B HER2- 10.8%, luminal B HER2+ 15.4%, HER2+ 25%, and in triple negative 14.3%. Conservative surgeries were done in 9 (7.7%) patients. There is a weak positive association between Ki67 expression and tumor clinical response. Pathological complete response occurred in 8 (6.83%) cases, being more frequent in luminal B HER2+ patients (23%). CONCLUSIONS: Pathological complete responses were more often in luminal B HER2+ cases.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the leading cause of death from malignancy in women. The incidence increases with age, but the relationship between age and survival of breast cancer patients is not well defined. It is observed that young women with breast cancer have patterns more aggressive biological. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, sociodemographic, clinical and histopathological features of breast cancer in women under 40 years attending a specialist breast unit in Mexico City. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Transversal, descriptive and retrospective study of patients under 40 years of age with breast cancer treated between 2005 and 2010. RESULTS: 1430 cases were diagnosed with breast cancer five years with a mean age of 53.64 +/- 11.87 years (range 23 to 93 years), 142 cases were women under 40 years of age (10%). The auto-detection of a breast lump was the most frequent clinical manifestation (50%). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of clinical stage III in this age group suggests the difficulty of diagnosis, the high breast density, which is one factor limiting studies of screening with mammography, it diminishes their effectiveness in early detection of breast cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Lobular/epidemiologia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idade de Início , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/terapia , Carcinoma Lobular/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Lobular/cirurgia , Carcinoma Lobular/terapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Combinada , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Mamografia , Mastectomia/métodos , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/terapia , Ovariectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Radioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the third most common gynecologic malignancy worldwide. Most of cases it is of epithelial origin. At the present time there is not a standardized screening method, which makes difficult the early diagnosis. The 5-year survival is 90% for early stages, however most cases present at advanced stages, which have a 5-year survival of only 5-20%. GICOM collaborative group, under the auspice of different institutions, have made the following consensus in order to make recommendations for the diagnosis and management regarding to this neoplasia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following recommendations were made by independent professionals in the field of Gynecologic Oncology, questions and statements were based on a comprehensive and systematic review of literature. It took place in the context of a meeting of two days in which a debate was held. These statements are the conclusions reached by agreement of the participant members. RESULTS: No screening method is recommended at the time for the detection of early lesions of ovarian cancer in general population. Staging is surgical, according to FIGO. In regards to the pre-surgery evaluation of the patient, it is recommended to perform chest radiography and CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast. According to the histopathology of the tumor, in order to consider it as borderline, the minimum percentage of proliferative component must be 10% of tumor's surface. The recommended standardized treatment includes primary surgery for diagnosis, staging and cytoreduction, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy Surgery must be performed by an Oncologist Gynecologist or an Oncologist Surgeon because inadequate surgery performed by another specialist has been reported in 75% of cases. In regards to surgery it is recommended to perform total omentectomy since subclinic metastasis have been documented in 10-30% of all cases, and systematic limphadenectomy, necessary to be able to obtain an adequate surgical staging. Fertility-sparing surgery will be performed in certain cases, the procedure should include a detailed inspection of the contralateral ovary and also negative for malignancy omentum and ovary biopsy. Until now, laparoscopy for diagnostic-staging surgery is not well known as a recommended method. The recommended chemotherapy is based on platin and taxanes for 6 cycles, except in Stage IA, IB and grade 1, which have a good prognosis. In advanced stages, primary cytoreduction is recommended as initial treatment. Minimal invasion surgery is not a recommended procedure for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Radiotherapy can be used to palliate symptoms. Follow up of the patients every 2-4 months for 2 years, every 3-6 months for 3 years and anually after the 5th year is recommended. Evaluation of quality of life of the patient must be done periodically. CONCLUSIONS: In the present, there is not a standardized screening method. Diagnosis in early stages means a better survival. Standardized treatment includes primary surgery with the objective to perform an optimal cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy Treatment must be individualized according to each patient. Radiotherapy can be indicated to palliate symptoms.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ovarianas , Assistência ao Convalescente , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Terapia Combinada , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Genes Neoplásicos , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/normas , Síndromes Neoplásicas Hereditárias/genética , Omento/cirurgia , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , Ovariectomia/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos , Qualidade de Vida , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Terapia de Salvação , Taxoides/administração & dosagemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the second most common gynecologic malignancy worldwide in the peri and postmenopausal period. Most often for the endometrioid variety. In early clinical stages long-term survival is greater than 80%, while in advanced stages it is less than 50%. In our country there is not a standard management between institutions. GICOM collaborative group under the auspice of different institutions have made the following consensus in order to make recommendations for the management of patients with this type of neoplasm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following recommendations were made by independent professionals in the field of Gynecologic Oncology, questions and statements were based on a comprehensive and systematic review of literature. It took place in the context of a meeting of four days in which a debate was held. These statements are the conclusions reached by agreement of the participant members. RESULTS: Screening should be performed women at high risk (diabetics, family history of inherited colon cancer, Lynch S. type II). Endometrial thickness in postmenopausal patients is best evaluated by transvaginal US, a thickness greater than or equal to 5 mm must be evaluated. Women taking tamoxifen should be monitored using this method. Abnormal bleeding in the usual main symptom, all post menopausal women with vaginal bleeding should be evaluated. Diagnosis is made by histerescopy-guided biopsy. Magnetic resonance is the best image method as preoperative evaluation. Frozen section evaluates histologic grade, myometrial invasion, cervical and adnexal involvement. Total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo oophorectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy should be performed except in endometrial histology grades 1 and 2, less than 50% invasion of the myometrium without evidence of disease out of the uterus. Omentectomy should be done in histologies other than endometriod. Surgery should be always performed by a Gynecologic Oncologist or Surgical Oncologist, laparoscopy is an alternative, especially in patients with hypertension and diabetes for being less morbid. Adjuvant treatment after surgery includes radiation therapy to the pelvis, brachytherapy, and chemotherapy. Patients with Stages III and IV should have surgery with intention to achieve optimal cytoreduction because of the impact on survival (51 m vs. 14 m), the treatment of recurrence can be with surgery depending on the pattern of relapse, systemic chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Follow-up of patients is basically clinical in a regular basis. CONCLUSIONS: Screening programme is only for high risk patients. Multidisciplinary treatment impacts on survival and local control of the disease, including surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy, hormonal treatment is reserved to selected cases of recurrence. This is the first attempt of a Mexican Collaborative Group in Gynecology to give recommendations is a special type of neoplasm.