RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although a 1-year duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is used in many patients after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, the evidence supporting this duration is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated the risk-benefit profile of 1-year vs ≤6-month DAPT after DES using 2 novel scores to risk stratify bleeding and ischemic events. METHODS: Ischemic and bleeding risk scores were generated from ADAPT-DES (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Drug-Eluting Stents), a multicenter, international, "all-comers" registry that enrolled 8,665 patients treated with DES. The risk-benefit profile of 1-year vs ≤6-month DAPT was then investigated across risk strata from an individual patient data pooled dataset of 7 randomized trials that enrolled 15,083 patients treated with DES. RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, the ischemic score and the bleeding score had c-indexes of 0.76 and 0.66, respectively, and both were well calibrated. In the pooled dataset, no significant difference was apparent in any ischemic endpoint between 1-year and ≤6-month DAPT, regardless of the risk strata. In the overall dataset, there was no significant difference in the risk of clinically relevant bleeding between 1-year and ≤6-month DAPT; however, among 2,508 patients at increased risk of bleeding, 1-year compared with ≤6-month DAPT was associated with greater bleeding (HR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.12-7.13) without a reduced risk of ischemic events in any risk strata, including those with acute coronary syndromes. These results were consistent in a network meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In the present large-scale study, compared with ≤6-month DAPT, a 1-year duration of DAPT was not associated with reduced adverse ischemic events in any risk strata (including acute coronary syndromes) but was associated with greater bleeding in patients at increased risk of bleeding.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Stents Farmacológicos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
AIMS: We sought to explore whether global and regional scientific output in cardiovascular medicine is associated with economic variables and follows the same trend as medicine and as science overall. METHODS AND RESULTS: We registered the number of documents, number of citations, citations per document and the h-index for the first 50 countries according to the h-index (a measure to evaluate both the productivity and impact of the publications) in cardiovascular medicine. Economic variables (gross domestic product [GDP] per capita, % expenditure of the GDP in research and development [R&D] and health) were obtained from the World Bank, the UNESCO, and the World Health Organization. In total, the scientific output in cardiology showed the same position as in medicine and science overall (mean difference vs. medicine -0.9±5.3º, p=0.25 vs. science -0.7±5.3º, p=0.39). We found significant correlations between the h-index and the % GDP expenditure in R&D (r=0.67, p<0.001), and the % GDP expenditure in health (r=0.71, p<0.0001). Overall, there was a 21.4% (interquartile range 3.7; 55.0) increase in the % GDP expenditure in R&D between 1996 and 2007. Emerging economies showed the larger growth in % GDP expenditure in health and R&D. CONCLUSIONS: The global situation of scientific output in cardiovascular medicine is highly polarised and closely related to economic indicators. Emergent economies, with higher rates of GDP growth and increasingly larger expenditures for R&D and healthcare, are expected to show a visible escalation in the scientific global picture in the near future.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Gastos em Saúde , Bibliometria , Produto Interno Bruto/estatística & dados numéricos , Produto Interno Bruto/tendências , HumanosRESUMO
Introdução: O implante transcateter de prótese valvular aórtica (ITVA) tem sido utilizado em nosso meio e em diversos países do mundo como alternativa ao tratamento conservador em pacientes com estenose aórtica grave e elevado risco cirúrgico. Objetivou-se descrever o perfil clínico basal e a mortalidade a curto e médio prazos de uma série consecutiva de casos tratados com ITVA em dois centros localizados, respectivamente, na Itália e no Brasil. Métodos: A população de estudo foi composta pelos primeiros 75 pacientes consecutivos com estenose valvar aórtica grave tratados com a prótese Medtronic CoreValve TM Revalving System (MCV Medtronic, Minneapolis, Estados Unidos). Tipicamente, a indicação para o ITVA foi motivada pelo alto risco cirúrgico. A média de idade era de 82 anos, 55% eram mulheres, um terço apresentava doença pulmonar grave e 95% apresentavam insuficiência cardíaca sintomática. Resultados: Após o ITVA, houve redução significativa do gradiente transvalvar aórtico máximo (basal: 95,8 + 32,3 mmHg; pós-procedimento: 18,5 + 6,1 mmHg) e médio (basal: 45,9 + 16,9 mmHg; pós-procedimento: 10,4 + 5,2 mmHg) (P < 0,01 para ambos). Insuficiência aórtica moderada ou acentuada foi evidenciada em 7% dos casos após ITVA. A taxa de sobrevida global aos 30 dias foi de 91,6% e aos 12 meses, de 79%. Conclusões: O ITVA surge como um método terapêutico de grande relevância para portadores de estenose aórtica de alto risco cirúrgico. As taxas de sobrevida precoce e a médio prazo indicam o benefício potencial do novo procedimento também para pacientes tratados no chamado mundo real.
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been used in our country and in several differentcountries worldwide as an alternative to conservative treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis and high surgicalrisk. This paper aimed at describing the baseline clinical profile and the short and medium-term mortality of a consecutive series of cases treated with TAVI in two centers in Italy and Brazil, respectively. Methods: The study population included the first 75 consecutive patients with severeaortic stenosis treated with the Medtronic CoreValveTM Revalving System (MCV Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA). Typically, the indication for TAVI was motivated by high surgical risk. Mean age was 82 years, 55% were females, a third had severe lung disease, and 95% had symptomaticheart failure. Results: TAVI was associated with a significant reduction of peak (baseline: 95.8 + 32.3 mmHg; postprocedure: 18.5 + 6.1 mmHg) and mean (baseline: 45.9 + 16.9 mmHg; post-procedure: 10.4 + 5.2 mmHg) transaortic gradient (P < 0.01 for both). Moderate or severe aortic insufficiencywas observed in 7% of the cases. The overall survival rate at 30 days was 91.6% and at 12 months it was 79%.Conclusions: TAVI emerges as an important therapeutic option for high risk patients with aortic stenosis. The short and mediumterm survival rates suggest that the new procedure might beof benefit for patients treated in the real world context.
Assuntos
Humanos , Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Cateterismo , Heparina/administração & dosagemRESUMO
Renal impairment is an important predictor of mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention and may increase the restenosis rate. However, the relation between restenosis and the risk of death in patients who have renal impairment remains unclear. We evaluated the incidences of repeat revascularization and mortality in patients who had renal impairment and those who did not and who received sirolimus-eluting stents or bare stents. A total of 1,080 consecutive patients treated for 1 year had available data to calculate baseline creatinine clearance. Patients received bare stents (first 6 months, n = 543) or sirolimus-eluting stents (last 6 months, n = 537) and were grouped according to the presence or absence of renal impairment (creatinine clearance <60 ml/min). Patients who had renal impairment had a higher mortality rate at 1 year (7.6% vs 2.5%, hazard ratio 3.14, 95% confidence interval 1.68 to 5.88, p <0.01), with no differences in mortality between patients who received bare stents and those who received sirolimus-eluting stents (hazard ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 1.68, p = 0.8). The incidence of target vessel revascularization decreased significantly in patients who were treated with sirolimus-eluting stents and did not have renal impairment (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.90, p = 0.01) and in those who had decreased renal function (hazard ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.90, p = 0.03). Thus, sirolimus-eluting stents compared with conventional stents decreased clinical restenosis in patients who had renal impairment. However, this benefit was not paralleled by a decrease in the risk of death in this population. It seems unlikely that restenosis could be a contributing factor that influenced the increased mortality of patients who had impaired renal function.
Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Estenose Coronária/terapia , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Sirolimo/administração & dosagem , Stents , Idoso , Estenose Coronária/complicações , Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose Coronária/mortalidade , Estenose Coronária/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Testes de Função Renal , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Radiografia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
We assessed the impact of long-term fluvastatin treatment on adverse atherosclerotic cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization excluding repeat interventions due to restenosis in the first 6 months) in 847 patients (fluvastatin [n = 417] or placebo [n = 430]) with average cholesterol levels treated with stents in the Lescol Intervention Prevention Study (LIPS). During the 4-year follow-up period, fluvastatin significantly decreased total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and decreased the risk of first adverse atherosclerotic cardiac events by 30% compared with placebo (95% confidence interval -49 to -3.4, p = 0.03).