RESUMO
BACKGROUND: With the availability of high-quality asthma guidelines worldwide, one possible approach of developing a valid guideline, without re-working the evidence, already analysed by major guidelines, is the ADAPTE approach, as was used for the development of National Guidelines on asthma. METHODS: The guidelines development group (GDG) covered a broad range of experts from medical specialities, primary care physicians and methodologists. The core group of the GDG searched the literature for asthma guidelines 2005 onward, and analysed the 11 best guidelines with AGREE-II to select three mother guidelines. Key clinical questions were formulated covering each step of the asthma management. RESULTS: The selected mother guidelines are British Thoracic Society (BTS), GINA and GEMA 2015. Responses to the questions were formulated according to the evidence in the mother guidelines. Recommendations or suggestions were made for asthma treatment in Mexico by the core group, and adjusted during several rounds of a Delphi process, taking into account: 1. Evidence; 2. Safety; 3. Cost; 4. Patient preference - all these set against the background of the local reality. Here the detailed analysis of the evidence present in BTS/GINA/GEMA sections on prevention and diagnosis in paediatric asthma are presented for three age-groups: children with asthma ≤5 years, 6-11 years and ≥12 years. CONCLUSIONS: For the prevention and diagnosis sections, applying the AGREE-II method is useful to develop a scientifically-sustained document, adjusted to the local reality per country, as is the Mexican Guideline on Asthma.
Assuntos
Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/prevenção & controle , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , MéxicoRESUMO
SETTING: Adverse events (AEs) that occur during medical treatment are a public health problem. OBJECTIVE: 1) To measure the prevalence of AEs, 2) to characterize those that occur in patients diagnosed with empyema and 3) to analyze the mortality rate associated with the presence of empyema. DESIGN: Retrospective case series based on a review of files of patient diagnosed with empyema. RESULTS: A total of 347 files were assessed, reporting 96.6% of the total number of patients diagnosed with empyema in that period. There were 176 AEs reported for 150 of the patients. The frequency of at least one AE was 43%, with prolonged hospitalization being the most frequent condition. In these cases, 97% of the AEs were considered preventable. Intrahospital mortality was 4.8%, with age (HR for every 5 years 1.21, 95%CI 1.08-1.35, P < 0.001) and the presence of diabetes mellitus (HR 2.26, 95%CI 1.0-5.0, P = 0.04) being significant associated factors. CONCLUSION: There was a high frequency of AEs in patients with empyema, but most were considered preventable, especially the length of hospitalization, which could be reduced through timely surgery.
Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Empiema Pleural/terapia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Adulto , Empiema Pleural/mortalidade , Feminino , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
In order to validate a form of measuring dyspnea, a visual analog scale (VAS) was applied to 27 patients with different types of interstitial lung diseases (ILD). The test was done in two days with an interval of one month (dyspnea1 and dyspnea2). Additionally, the forced vital capacity (FVC) was obtained on these occasions (FVC1, FVC2). Nineteen patients with a recent diagnosis of ILD (RD) and eight with a previous diagnosis of ILD (PD) were included. In patients with RD, dyspnea1 correlated with FVC1 (r = -0.66, p < 0.01). A month after the initial treatment with steroids, dyspnea (mean +/- SD) decreased from 38 +/- 25 mm to 17 +/- 19 mm (p < 0.03), while the FVC increased from 1086 +/- 464 mL to 1350 +/- 536 mL (p < 0.05). Likewise, dyspnea2 correlated with FVC2 (r = -0.47, p < 0.05). As expected, patients with PD did not exhibit significant changes in the analysis of dyspnea on the second evaluation. The inter-observer coefficient of variation for the 8 patients with PD was of 5% and 9% for the first and second evaluations respectively, while the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.92 and 0.91 respectively. The intra-observer coefficient of variation of two different observers was of 15% and 16% respectively, while the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.69 and 0.62 respectively. These results suggest that the use of a VAS might be useful for the initial evaluation and during the follow-up of patients with ILD.