Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ; 38(3): 405-406, 2023 05 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36459477

RESUMO

Recurrent pericardial effusion is commonly encountered in neoplastic and infective disorders. Intervention is compulsory in patients with unstable hemodynamics and tamponading effusion. Surgical options include: pericardiocentesis, subxiphoid pericardiostomy, and pericardial window. The latter has proved to have lower incidence of recurrence; however, the technique has been continuously refined to improve the recurrence-free survival and decrease postoperative morbidity. We herein present a novel simple modification to minimize recurrence by anchoring the free edges of pericardial fenestration overlying the superior vena cava and right atrium to the chest wall. Follow-up showed no recurrence compared to 3.5% in the conventional procedure.


Assuntos
Derrame Pericárdico , Veia Cava Superior , Humanos , Veia Cava Superior/cirurgia , Derrame Pericárdico/cirurgia , Derrame Pericárdico/etiologia , Técnicas de Janela Pericárdica , Hemodinâmica , Átrios do Coração/cirurgia
2.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 38(3): 405-406, 2023. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1441207

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Recurrent pericardial effusion is commonly encountered in neoplastic and infective disorders. Intervention is compulsory in patients with unstable hemodynamics and tamponading effusion. Surgical options include: pericardiocentesis, subxiphoid pericardiostomy, and pericardial window. The latter has proved to have lower incidence of recurrence; however, the technique has been continuously refined to improve the recurrence-free survival and decrease postoperative morbidity. We herein present a novel simple modification to minimize recurrence by anchoring the free edges of pericardial fenestration overlying the superior vena cava and right atrium to the chest wall. Follow-up showed no recurrence compared to 3.5% in the conventional procedure.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA