RESUMO
Introduction: The application of muscle force is a determinant of football success as it is inherent to the motor control and sport. The aims of this study are: (1) to describe force variables Isometric Maximal Force (IMF), Concentric Peak Force (CPPF), and Dynamic Strength Index (DSI) in football goalkeepers from different age groups; (2) to compare these variables' behavior between those groups. Methods: The sample was formed by 19 youth players (15.97 ± 1.55 years old) from a first-division Brazilian football team. The CPPF and IMF variables were obtained through the Countermovement jump and isometric squat tests, respectively. For data collection, a force plate (Cefise, Brazil) was used with an acquisition frequency of 600â Hz and mono-axial. The DSI was calculated using the ratio between CPPF and IMF. For data analysis, the sample was separated into clusters by age. After the grouping, a descriptive analysis of the data and a comparison between the groups with p < 0.05. Results: The sample was grouped into three groups (GA, GB, and GC) and one of the individuals did not enter the group, totaling 18 individuals in the analyzed sample. The comparison between the ages of the groups showed a significant difference and small and moderate effect size (ES), validating the cluster strategy. The CPPF and IMF variables showed increased values according to chronological age. CPPF showed a significant difference between GA-GB, (ES = very large) GA-GC (ES = very large), and GB-GC (ES = moderate). The IMF variable had significant differences between GA-GB (ES = moderate) and GA-GC (ES = very large). However, DSI showed significant differences only between GA GB (ES = small) and GB-GC (ES = very large). Conclusions: The CPPF and IMF variables had constant increases and distinct values with an increase according to age, and this did not occur for DSI. The difference between CPPF and IMF compared to DSI bring to light the variability in dynamics and proportionality between muscular force in the concentric phase and maximal force in the isometric regime during the developmental process over chronological age in soccer goalkeepers.
RESUMO
Estimating exposure is one of the most important steps in an environmental risk analysis of crop-protection products to nontarget organisms. Regulatory agencies such as the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA), and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) all use mathematical exposure models in their regulatory assessment process. Brazil has been discussing the adoption of the Pesticide in Water Calculator (PWC) to be applied in aquatic pesticide risk assessment. Therefore, a qualitative sensitivity analysis (Morris OAT method) was performed to understand which are the most important local parameters in the PWC to estimate environmental concentrations in surface water (EECSW ). In addition, an exercise made up of two corn scenarios in two Brazilian regions was developed (Uberlândia [UDI] and Arapoti [ARA]). Two herbicides with different soil-binding properties and modes of action were selected to estimate the EECSW . The results demonstrated that the parameters of importance were different for each site, probably the result of different soil characteristics and meteorological patterns. This outcome suggests that regulatory agencies should consider developing more than one scenario to account for different agricultural regions. For Herbicide 1, the EECSW for UDI were similar to US scenarios, whereas for ARA they were lower. For Herbicide 2, the EECSW for the UDI site was higher than most of the US scenarios, whereas at the ARA site, EECs were similar to four US scenarios and lower than the other six. Local data were used as a refinement, resulting in the decrease in the EECSW for both herbicides in the UDI site. For the ARA site, Herbicide 1 displayed a similar EECSW value, whereas for Herbicide 2, it was lower after the refinement. Overall, these results demonstrated the importance of developing local scenarios to provide more realism to estimate pesticide exposure from its agricultural use and may help regulators to determine and recommend mitigations regarding the use of crop-protection products. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;19:1374-1384. © 2023 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Assuntos
Herbicidas , Praguicidas , Poluentes Químicos da Água , Brasil , Poluentes Químicos da Água/análise , Praguicidas/toxicidade , Praguicidas/análise , Herbicidas/toxicidade , Herbicidas/análise , Solo/química , Medição de Risco , Água/análiseRESUMO
In regulatory risk assessment, surrogate species of fish, aquatic invertebrates, and primary producers are tested to assess toxicity and subsequently the risk of pesticides to freshwater biota. This study evaluates whether the standard, surrogate test species (mostly temperate in latitudinal distribution) used in many parts of the world are suitable surrogates for first-tier risk assessments involving tropical freshwater biota. Data for the toxicity of pesticides to tropical fish, invertebrates, and primary producer species were extracted from the USEPA ECOTOX database and peer-reviewed literature. For each pesticide, the most sensitive regulatory endpoint extracted from the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) dossiers for freshwater fish, invertebrates, and primary producers was selected. The ratios of the endpoint for tropical species and for the most sensitive regulatory endpoint for the appropriate taxonomic group were determined. A value >1 indicates that the tropical species is less sensitive than the respective standard regulatory species. Tropical fish species were less sensitive than standard fish species in 84% of the comparisons, and in 93.5% of the comparisons, tropical fish were less or similarly sensitive (within a factor of 5). For aquatic invertebrates, 78.1% of the evaluated tropical species were less sensitive than standard species and 93.3% of tropical invertebrates species were less or similarly sensitive. For primary producers, 96% of tropical species were less sensitive than standard test species. Overall, standard species used globally were more sensitive or similarly sensitive compared to tropical species in more than 93% of the cases. In conclusion, the data show that freshwater toxicity data for pesticides from tests using standard test species, tested according to international accepted guidelines, are appropriate for use in first-tier risk assessments for tropical environments. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;19:202-212. © 2022 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Assuntos
Praguicidas , Poluentes Químicos da Água , Animais , Praguicidas/toxicidade , Poluentes Químicos da Água/toxicidade , Invertebrados , Medição de Risco , Inocuidade dos Alimentos , PeixesRESUMO
Pseudoreplication is a widely discussed topic in the scientific community. Its principal critique concerns the lack of independence in flawed experimental designs and the use of inferential statistics to test the hypothesis of such experiments. Thirty years after its appearance, it remains misunderstood by many researchers, including ecotoxicologists. In the present study, we try to clarify some of its concepts by filling in what seems to be a gap in the terminology of manipulative experiments. We propose the term "experimental medium" to refer strictly to the relevant spatial scale of the experiment to preserve the specificity of the experimental and observational units and to display pseudoreplication as a kind of misinterpretation and/or misanalysis of inferential statistics. A classification of the types of experimental designs in ecotoxicology is offered, and the problems in using inferential statistics in suboptimal designs are discussed. We hope to shed some light on such a classic topic for ecotoxicologists. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:2868-2874. © 2017 SETAC.