RESUMO
AIMS: To evaluate pancreas graft function, use of insulin, cholesterol, triglyceride levels, prescription of lipid-lowering drugs, and immunosuppressive regimens among recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPKT), who had initial immunosuppression with tacrolimus, sirolimus, and corticosteroids. METHODS: From 2000 to 2007, we performed 73 SKPT, among which we conducted a retrospective data analysis on 51 medical records of patients who had been followed for at least 6 to 72 months. We excluded from the analysis eight recipients who died before 6 months: eight with early pancreas graft losses and six for continued follow-up in other centers. RESULTS: There were four pancreas graft losses after 6 months due in two diabetes mellitus recurrence, one posttuberculosis treatment, and one after use of nonsteroidal inflammatory medication. Mean plasma glucose levels ranged from 84 to 103 mg/dL, while glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1) levels ranged from 5.7% to 6.2%. At 6, 12, 36, and 60 months, 80%, 91%, 86%, and 75% of recipients, respectively, had HbA1 lower than 6.5%. In the same period, 10%, 8%, 10%, and 11% of recipients became insulin-dependent. Mean cholesterol levels (mg/dL) at 6, 12, 36, and 60 month were 190, 180, 196 and 193, while triglyceride levels (mg/dL) were 162, 129, 106, and 113 respectively. Recipient's rate of lipid-lowering drug use was 18%, 21%, 20%, and 22% at 6, 12, 36, and 60 months. Mean serum creatinine levels (mg/dL) with standard deviations were 1.3 +/- 0.4, 1.5 +/- 0.4, 1.6 +/- 0.5, 1.8 +/- 0.9, at 6, 12, 36 and 60 months respectively. Nineteen recipients had sirolimus suspended and 14 recipients, tacrolimus suspended as well for various reasons. CONCLUSION: Mean plasma glucose levels were normal during the period. About 10% of recipients became insulin-dependent and 20% required lipid-lowering drugs. The immunosuppressive regimen protocol had to be changed in 60% of patients.
Assuntos
Colesterol/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirurgia , Nefropatias Diabéticas/cirurgia , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/fisiologia , Transplante de Pâncreas/fisiologia , Triglicerídeos/sangue , Glicemia/metabolismo , Seguimentos , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Humanos , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/imunologia , Transplante de Rim/mortalidade , Transplante de Pâncreas/imunologia , Transplante de Pâncreas/mortalidade , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the Belzer vs Custodiol solutions for cadaveric kidney perfusion in relation to delayed graft function, renal function, acute rejection episodes, and patient and graft survivals. METHODS: This randomized prospective study included 42 kidneys and 9 simultaneous kidney and pancreas recipients from December 2002 to February 2004, namely 24 in the Custodiol arm and 27 in the Belzer arm. We analyzed delayed graft function frequency, acute rejection episodes (biopsy proven), renal function (creatinine at 1, 6, and 12 months), as well as graft and patient survivals. Categorical and continuous variables were evaluated as appropriate. RESULTS: We failed to observe a difference in the immunosuppressant drug protocol, cold ischemia time, or mean recipient or donor age. The prevalence of delayed graft function was 63% among the Belzer arm, and 50% among the Custodiol arm (P = NS). The renal function was the same in both arms at 1, 6, and 12 months. The graft survival after 3 months was 94% among the Belzer group (death from sepsis), and 95% among the Custodiol group (nonfunctioning graft). At 1 year, the results were 78% among the Belzer group (4 deaths from cardiovascular or infectious complications and 2 graft losses), and 79% among the Custodiol group (3 deaths, 1 primary nonfunctioning graft, and 1 graft loss; P = NS). After 12 months follow-up, patient survival was 84% among the Belzer group, and 86% among the Custodiol group. In the first year, the incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes were 37% among the Belzer group, and 33% among the Custodiol group. CONCLUSION: Custodiol solution achieved similar results compared with Belzer solution.