RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) pandemic has continued to generate notable disruption in elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is any difference in patient characteristics, revenue, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing THA and TKA after the start of the pandemic. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of 26,493 patients undergoing primary and revision THA and TKA by 48 surgeons in a single arthroplasty practice. We compared demographics, comorbidities, outcomes, and surgeon revenue from THA and TKA procedures from March 2020 to February 2021 with a prepandemic group undergoing a procedure from March 2019 to February 2020. RESULTS: There was a 20% decline in the volume of all cases in the pandemic group ( 11,688 versus 14,664 , P < 0.001). The postpandemic cohort had shorter length of stay (1.58 versus 1.70 days, P = 0.007), had higher rates of home discharge (98% versus 91%, P < 0.001), and were more likely to have their procedure done at an outpatient facility (21% versus 7%, P < 0.001). Even among patients older than 65 years, more pandemic patients underwent a procedure as an outpatient (19% versus 7%, P < 0.001), with no difference in complications or readmissions. Total surgeon charges and payments declined by 17.6% and 16.3%, respectively, during the pandemic ( P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Although the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a notable reduction in surgical volume and revenue loss for our practice, we found a marked shift of arthroplasty patients to outpatient facilities with increased rates of home discharge without compromising patient safety.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , COVID-19 , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Pandemias , Readmissão do Paciente , Tempo de Internação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: While injections within 90 days prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are associated with an increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), there is a paucity of literature regarding the impact of cumulative injections on PJI risk. This study was conducted to assess the association between cumulative corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections and PJI risk following TKA. METHODS: This retrospective study using an injection database included patients undergoing TKA with a minimum 1-year follow-up from 2015 to 2020. Patients with injections within 90 days prior to surgery were excluded. The sum of corticosteroid and HA injections within five years prior to TKA was recorded. The primary outcome was PJI within 90 days following TKA. Area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated for a cumulative number of injections. RESULTS: 648 knees with no injections and 672 knees with injections prior to TKA were included, among whom 243 received corticosteroids, 151 received HA, and 278 received both. No significant differences in early PJI rates existed between patients who received injections (0.60%) or not (0.93%) (P = .541). No significant differences existed in early PJI rates between patients injected with corticosteroids (0.82%), HA (0.66%), or both (0.36%) (P = .832). No cutoff number of injections was predictive for PJI. DISCUSSION: A cumulative amount of steroid or HA injections, if given more than 90 days prior to TKA, does not appear to increase the risk of PJI within 90 days postoperatively. Multiple intraarticular corticosteroid injections and HA injections may be safely administered before TKA, without increased risk for early PJI.
Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Artroplastia do Joelho , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Artrite Infecciosa/etiologia , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/efeitos adversos , Injeções Intra-Articulares/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/complicações , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to have higher failure rates in obese patients, and cementless TKA may provide more durable fixation. This study compared outcomes and survivorship of obese patients undergoing cemented and cementless TKA of the same modern design. METHODS: We identified a consecutive series of 406 primary cementless TKA performed in obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 in 2013-2018. Each case was matched 1:1 with 406 cemented TKA based on age, sex, BMI, bearing surface, and year of surgery. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Short Form-12 were collected preoperatively, at 6 months and 2 years. Implant survivorship was recorded at mean 4.0 years (range 2.0-7.8). RESULTS: There was no difference in mean BMI between the cemented (38.6 ± 3.4 kg/m2; range, 35-60) and cementless cohorts (38.7 ± 3.3 kg/m2; range, 35-54; P = .706). Both groups had similar final postoperative scores and improvement in scores at 2 years. Furthermore, a similar percentage met the minimal clinically important difference (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, 70.0% vs 71.2%, P = .700; Short Form-12 Physical, 74.1% vs 70.4%, P = .240). Both groups demonstrated high 7-year survivorship free from aseptic revision (99.0% vs 99.5%, P = .665). CONCLUSION: Obese patients with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 undergoing cementless and cemented TKA of the same modern design had similar outcomes and survivorship at early to mid-term follow-up. Continued surveillance of this high-risk population is necessary.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Traumatismos do Joelho , Prótese do Joelho , Osteoartrite , Índice de Massa Corporal , Cimentos Ósseos , Humanos , Obesidade/complicações , Falha de Prótese , Reoperação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: As a procedure with lower surgical morbidity, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) may present a practical solution for elderly patients with unicompartmental arthritis. However, few studies have analyzed the results of UKA in the extreme elderly. This study compared the functional and perioperative outcomes between octogenarians and age-appropriate controls undergoing UKA. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of 44 patients aged ≥80 years who underwent unilateral UKA were analyzed. Each octogenarian was matched 1:3 with 132 patients aged 65-74 years using propensity scores adjusting for gender, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, and preoperative scores. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Short Form-12 were collected preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Complications, reoperations, readmissions, and unplanned visits were recorded up to 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean age was 70.0 ± 2.7 years in the control group and 83.0 ± 3.0 years in the octogenarian group (P < .001). The percentage of outpatient procedures was comparable (control 50.0%; octogenarian 45.5%; P = .601). With the exception of poorer Short Form-12 physical scores in octogenarians at 2 years (39.4 ± 14.1 vs 44.9 ± 9.2, P = .028), there was no difference in final postoperative scores or improvement in scores between the groups. The rate of complications, reoperations, readmissions, and emergency room visits was also similar. The five-year survivorship was 97% in the control group and 93% in the octogenarian group (P = .148). CONCLUSION: Octogenarians undergoing UKA can experience clinical outcomes that are similar to those of their younger counterparts. The clinical trajectory outlined may help clinicians provide valuable prognostic information to elderly patients and guide preoperative counseling.