RESUMO
PURPOSE: Oral mucositis is a major complication of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in head-and-neck cancer patients. Low-level laser (LLL) therapy is a promising preventive therapy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LLL therapy to decrease severe oral mucositis and its effect on RT interruptions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In the present randomized, double-blind, Phase III study, patients received either gallium-aluminum-arsenide LLL therapy 2.5 J/cm(2) or placebo laser, before each radiation fraction. Eligible patients had to have been diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, or metastases to the neck with an unknown primary site. They were treated with adjuvant or definitive CRT, consisting of conventional RT 60-70 Gy (range, 1.8-2.0 Gy/d, 5 times/wk) and concurrent cisplatin. The primary endpoints were the oral mucositis severity in Weeks 2, 4, and 6 and the number of RT interruptions because of mucositis. The secondary endpoints included patient-reported pain scores. To detect a decrease in the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 oral mucositis from 80% to 50%, we planned to enroll 74 patients. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were included, and 37 patients received preventive LLL therapy. The mean delivered radiation dose was greater in the patients treated with LLL (69.4 vs. 67.9 Gy, p = .03). During CRT, the number of patients diagnosed with Grade 3 or 4 oral mucositis treated with LLL vs. placebo was 4 vs. 5 (Week 2, p = 1.0), 4 vs. 12 (Week 4, p = .08), and 8 vs. 9 (Week 6, p = 1.0), respectively. More of the patients treated with placebo had RT interruptions because of mucositis (6 vs. 0, p = .02). No difference was detected between the treatment arms in the incidence of severe pain. CONCLUSIONS: LLL therapy was not effective in reducing severe oral mucositis, although a marginal benefit could not be excluded. It reduced RT interruptions in these head-and-neck cancer patients, which might translate into improved CRT efficacy.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Lasers Semicondutores/uso terapêutico , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Estomatite/prevenção & controle , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/secundário , Adulto , Idoso , Peso Corporal , Brasil , Carcinoma/radioterapia , Cisplatino , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Estomatite/etiologia , Estomatite/patologia , Falha de Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Unresectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), non-metastatic, comprises a heterogeneous group of patients (pts), formed of stage III and IV pts. Since the available literature had not distinguished among these two groups, we prospectively addressed whether the recommended regimen involving cisplatin 100 mg/m2 concurrent to conventionally delivered radiotherapy (RT) is feasible in stage IV pts, based on the efficacy and safety of this regimen. A total of 30 pts were enrolled onto this study. Chemoradiation (CRT) consisted of RT 70 Gy, delivered in 35 daily fractions of 2 Gy, in 7 weeks, concurrent to cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22 and 43. Supportive treatment was provided as needed. Twenty-eight pts had tumors staged as T4 and 20 had N2 or N3 cervical involvement. The most common primary sites were the oral cavity and the oropharynx (23 pts). We observed six complete responses and 12 partial responses, with an overall response rate of 60%. A high rate of treatment-related toxicities was observed, with three deaths during CRT, and 26 pts suffering from one or more grade 3/4 toxicities, mainly dysphagia, mucositis, dermatitis, vomiting, infection or anemia. A prolonged treatment time was observed (63 days), as a result of unplanned treatment breaks. The lack of requirement of red blood cell transfusion was favorably related to the response to the treatment (93% vs. 50%, P=0.033). For the whole population, with a median follow-up of 20.8 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.0 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 17.3 months. Longer median PFS and OS were seen in responding pts (12.8 vs. 4.1 months, P=0.0001; and not reached (NR) vs. 10.4 months, P=0.0037, respectively), as well as in those pts not requiring red blood cell transfusion (12.8 vs. 3.9 months, P=0.0162; and NR vs. 10.4 months, P=0.0176, respectively). In conclusion, this concurrent CRT regimen is hardly delivered in stage IV, unresectable, locally advanced HNSCC pts, due to treatment-related toxicities and longer RT duration. As a subset of pts may benefit from this regimen, adequate patient selection and aggressive supportive measures are essential.