RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics and healthcare use of children with medical complexity who receive paid certified nursing assistant (CNA) care by a family member (family CNA) and by a traditional nonfamily member (nonfamily CNA). STUDY DESIGN: This was retrospective cohort study of children who received CNA care through Colorado's Medicaid paid family caregiving program between 2017 and 2019 by a home healthcare agency. We compared patient characteristics between the family CNA and nonfamily CNA groups. A multivariable Poisson regression model was used to compare hospitalization rates (days in the hospital per year), adjusting for patient age patient sex, nursing care, and complex chronic condition. RESULTS: Of 861 patients, 79% (n = 680) received family CNA care and 21% (n = 181) received nonfamily CNA care. Patient demographics and hospitalization did not differ between the groups, although patients who had family CNAs were less likely to receive additional nursing-level care (42% vs 60%, P < .01). Family and nonfamily CNA caregivers had similar characteristics, except that family CNA caregivers had substantially better 3-year retention (82% vs 9%, P < .01) despite lower average hourly pay ($14.60 vs $17.60 per hour, P < .01). Hospitalizations were rare (<10% of patients). In the adjusted model, patients who received family CNA care experienced 1 more hospitalized day per year, compared with patients who received nonfamily CNA care (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Paid family caregivers provided CAN-level care to children with medical complexity with a greater employee retention compared with nonfamily CNA caregivers, with marginally different hospitalization rates using a family-centered approach. This model may help address workforce shortages while also providing income to family caregivers.
Assuntos
Cuidadores , Medicaid , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Criança , Colorado , Estudos Retrospectivos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de SaúdeAssuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/diagnóstico , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/história , Adolescente , Experiências Adversas da Infância/psicologia , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/etiologia , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/psicologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Relações Familiares , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reasons for discharge delays for children with long-term mechanical ventilation. STUDY DESIGN: Charts of children (0-18 years of age) with a new tracheostomy in the Pulmonary Habilitation Program at the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago were retrospectively reviewed for demographic information, medical diagnoses, medical stability, discharge to home, reasons for discharge delay, and hours of staffed home nursing. All patients were discharged on mechanical ventilation. Discharge delay was defined as >10 days after medical stability. Hospital charges were analyzed and excess charges quantified beginning with the date of delay. Descriptive statistics and Pearson χ2 tests were used to compare nursing hours and demographics. RESULTS: Of 72 patients, 55% were male with mean age 1.8 years (SD 3.8) at tracheostomy placement. The most common long-term mechanical ventilation indication was chronic lung disease (n = 47, 65%); 54% had discharge delays, the majority were primarily due to lack of home nursing (62%), followed by delay of caregiver training (18%), caregiver health and social issues (8%), and delay in a transitional care facility bed (8%). Of the 39 delayed patients, 10% ($13 217 889) of hospital charges occurred during excess days with a median of $186 061 (IQR $117 661-$386 905) per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Over one-half of children discharged to the community from a large inpatient pediatric long-term mechanical ventilation program had a nonmedical delay of discharge home, most commonly because of home nurse staffing. This case series provides further evidence that limited availability of home nursing impedes efficient discharge and prolongs hospitalizations.