RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the advances in interventional cardiology, stent expansion remains an important predictor of success, impacting restenosis and thrombosis rates after either bare-metal (BMS) or drug-eluting stent implantation. Especially for the treatment of complex lesions (e.g., calcified lesions, in-stent restenosis, etc.), adequate lesion preparation might help improve procedural results as well as clinical outcomes. We sought to investigate the safety, feasibility and mechanism of action of a new scoring-balloon catheter, the AngioSculpt, comprised of a semicompliant balloon and a nitinol spiral cage designed to address complex lesions. METHODS: A total of 60 consecutive patients at two centers were prospectively enrolled in this first-in-man coronary study and divided into two groups according to the type of lesion treated: Group I: patients with de novo coronary lesions (n = 47) as a pretreatment strategy before BMS implantation, and Group II: patients with BMS restenosis (n = 17) as a standalone therapy. A subgroup of patients in each cohort was assigned to intravascular (IVUS) analysis. Patients in Group II were submitted to routine 6-month follow-up angiography. In Group I, angiographic restudy was contingent upon the presence of ischemia. Lesions longer than 20 mm in very tortuous vessels, in arterial or vein grafts, in the setting of acute myocardial infarction or with visible thrombus were excluded from this study. RESULTS: Success was achieved in all cases. The mean age of the study populations was 62 +/- 11.6 years (Group I) and 53 +/- 9.4 years (Group II), with 26% and 18% diabetics, respectively. In Group I, 73% of lesions were diffuse and fibrocalcified, while in Group II, 72% were classified as diffuse. No serious complications were observed in either group. Balloon slippage (or the "watermelon seed" phenomenon) was not observed. Significant acute gain was achieved in both groups (0.7 mm in Group I and 1.64 mm in Group II). A minimum final area (in-stent) 6.5 mm2 was achieved in 85% of the cases in Group I and in 82% of the cases in Group II. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary in vivo study, the use AngioSculpt(R) proved to be feasible and safe for the treatment of complex coronary lesions. Six-month results suggest the use of this novel device as an attractive option for the percutaneous approach of restenotic coronary lesions and should be assessed in a larger, more complex cohort of patients.
Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/instrumentação , Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose Coronária/terapia , Stents , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Idoso , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/métodos , Cateterismo , Reestenose Coronária/prevenção & controle , Stents Farmacológicos , Desenho de Equipamento , Segurança de Equipamentos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução VascularRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the effectiveness of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in reducing intimal hyperplasia (IH) and the need for repeat revascularization, concerns about their long-term safety have motivated the search for new drug-eluting stents (DES). Recently developed, the ZoMaxx stent combines a sirolimus-analogous agent (zotarolimus), featuring a phosphorycoline polymer and stainless steel and tantalum platform. We sought to assess the efficacy of this new DES in reducing IH. METHODS: A total of 40 patients were treated with the ZoMaxx stent and compared to 50 patients treated with its non-drug-eluting equivalent, the TriMaxx stent. Only single de novo lesions in native coronary vessels greater than or equal to 3.0 mm were enrolled. Serial quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images were obtained at baseline and 6- month follow up. All patients were clinically followed for 1 year. This analysis aimed to compare the percent of IH between the 2 stents. Secondarily, we assessed in-segment late loss, binary restenosis and major adverse cardiac events. RESULTS: Baseline patient and lesion characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. At follow up, zotarolimus efficiently suppressed neointimal hyperplasia formation with a marked reduction in the percentage of stent obstruction by IVUS (4.6 +/- 3.6% vs. 31.2 +/- 16%; p < 0.0001). Almost 90% of the segments stented with ZoMaxx did not exhibit more than 10% of obstruction. After 1 year, 12 patients treated with the TriMaxx and 2 patients treated with the ZoMaxx presented in-segment binary restenosis (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this initial experience, ZoMaxx proved to be clinically safe and superior to its non-drug-coated equivalent in reducing in-stent IH formation and restenosis.