Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Zoologia (Curitiba) ; 38: e61968, fev. 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | VETINDEX | ID: vti-765331

RESUMO

The following letter, from a network of women zoologists, is a reply to the article of AlShebli et al. (2020), which suggests that female protégés reap more benefits when mentored by men and concludes that female mentors hinder the success of their female protégés and the quality of their impact. This contribution has two parts. First, we highlight the most relevant methodological flaws which, in our opinion, may have impacted the conclusions of AlShebli et al. (2020). Second, we discuss issues pertaining to women in science, bring a perspective of Women in Zoology and discuss how current diversity policies are positively changing our field.(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Zoologia/tendências , Estudos de Gênero , Equidade de Gênero , Estudos de Gênero , Ciência/educação
2.
Zoologia (Curitiba, Impr.) ; 38: e61968, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1504606

RESUMO

The following letter, from a network of women zoologists, is a reply to the article of AlShebli et al. (2020), which suggests that female protégés reap more benefits when mentored by men and concludes that female mentors hinder the success of their female protégés and the quality of their impact. This contribution has two parts. First, we highlight the most relevant methodological flaws which, in our opinion, may have impacted the conclusions of AlShebli et al. (2020). Second, we discuss issues pertaining to women in science, bring a perspective of Women in Zoology and discuss how current diversity policies are positively changing our field.


Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Ciência/educação , Equidade de Gênero , Estudos de Gênero , Zoologia/tendências
3.
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1504618

RESUMO

ABSTRACT The following letter, from a network of women zoologists, is a reply to the article of AlShebli et al. (2020), which suggests that female protégés reap more benefits when mentored by men and concludes that female mentors hinder the success of their female protégés and the quality of their impact. This contribution has two parts. First, we highlight the most relevant methodological flaws which, in our opinion, may have impacted the conclusions of AlShebli et al. (2020). Second, we discuss issues pertaining to women in science, bring a perspective of Women in Zoology and discuss how current diversity policies are positively changing our field.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA