Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transplant Direct ; 7(7): e706, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34124342

RESUMO

Early acute kidney rejection remains an important clinical issue. METHODS: The current study included 552 recipients who had 1-2 surveillance or indication biopsy within the 1 y posttransplant. We evaluated the impact of type of allograft inflammation on allograft outcome. They were divided into 5 groups: no inflammation (NI: 95), subclinical inflammation (SCI: 244), subclinical T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) (SC-TCMR: 110), clinical TCMR (C-TCMR: 83), and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR: 20). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time using linear mixed model, cumulative chronic allograft scores/interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) ≥2 at 12 mo, and survival estimates were compared between groups. RESULTS: The common types of rejections were C-TCMR (15%), SC-TCMR (19.9%), and AMR (3.6%) of patients. Eighteen of 20 patients with AMR had mixed rejection with TCMR. Key findings were as follows: (i) posttransplant renal function: eGFR was lower for patients with C-TCMR and AMR (P < 0.0001) compared with NI, SCI, and SC-TCMR groups. There was an increase in delta-creatinine from 3 to 12 mo and cumulative allograft chronicity scores at 12 mo (P < 0.001) according to the type of allograft inflammation. (ii) Allograft histology: the odds of IFTA ≥2 was higher for SC-TCMR (3.7 [1.3-10.4]; P = 0.04) but was not significant for C-TCMR (3.1 [1.0-9.4]; P = 0.26), and AMR (2.5 [0.5-12.8]; P = 0.84) compared with NI group, and (iii) graft loss: C-TCMR accounted for the largest number of graft losses and impending graft losses on long-term follow-up. Graft loss among patient with AMR was numerically higher but was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The type of kidney allograft inflammation predicted posttransplant eGFR, cumulative chronic allograft score/IFTA ≥2 at 12 mo, and graft loss.

2.
Transplant Direct ; 5(6): e461, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31321295

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sleep disorders and fatigue are highly prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients but there is limited evidence on the effect of kidney transplant (KTx) on these. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study of patients with advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate<30 mL/min/1.73 m2) or ESKD, polysomnography and patient-reported symptom assessments were conducted. Pre- and post-KTx changes in sleep apnea (SA) severity (measured by apnea hypopnea index [AHI]) were analyzed and compared with patients who did not receive KTx. Regression models were used to examine predictors of SA severity. RESULTS: Among 77 patients (mean age 51 y, BMI 29 kg/m2, 66% males, 23% ESKD), 61% had SA at baseline. Among 39 KTx recipients, 56% had SA, with 39% having moderate-severe SA after 10 ± 5.6 months post-KTx. There was no difference in AHI in either the KTx (median 6 versus 8; P = 0.37) or no-KTx (median 15 versus 16; P = 0.61) groups after an average of 19.9 ± 8.9 months. KTx led to significant clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue and health-related quality of life (adjusted effect size 0.3-0.6). In multivariable regression, baseline AHI was the only significant predictor of SA severity (adjusted ß = 3.6/5 units, 95% confidence interval 2.1, 5.2) after adjusting for KTx status, age, sex, and body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the KTx recipients had SA. There was no significant change in SA severity with KTx. Clinically meaningful moderate size improvements in patient-reported fatigue and health-related quality of life may be seen with KTx.

3.
Chest ; 155(3): 626-638, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30266628

RESUMO

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is commonly used to provide renal support for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, particularly patients who are hemodynamically unstable. A variety of techniques that differ in their mode of solute clearance may be used, including continuous venovenous hemofiltration with predominantly convective solute clearance, continuous venovenous hemodialysis with predominantly diffusive solute clearance, and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration, which combines both dialysis and hemofiltration. The present article compares CRRT with other modalities of renal support and reviews indications for initiation of renal replacement therapy, as well as dosing and technical aspects in the management of CRRT.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Terapia de Substituição Renal Contínua , Terapia de Substituição Renal Contínua/métodos , Terapia de Substituição Renal Contínua/normas , Estado Terminal/terapia , Humanos , Seleção de Pacientes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA